You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "exceptionfactory (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/06/02 09:43:43 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] exceptionfactory opened a new pull request, #7329: NIFI-11630 Deprecate ECMAScript Script Engine

exceptionfactory opened a new pull request, #7329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7329

   # Summary
   
   [NIFI-11630](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11630) Deprecates the ECMAScript Script Engine option for scripted components.
   
   The [JEP 335](https://openjdk.org/jeps/335) deprecated the Nashorn engine for Java 11 and Java 17 does not include Nashorn.
   
   The deprecation includes adding DEPRECATED to the Script Engine property display name and logging a deprecation warning when starting a component that uses one of the deprecated Script Engines.
   
   Subsequent efforts can remove the ECMAScript Script Engine option from the main branch while this pull request target the support branch for version 1 releases.
   
   # Tracking
   
   Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.
   
   ### Issue Tracking
   
   - [X] [Apache NiFi Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI) issue created
   
   ### Pull Request Tracking
   
   - [X] Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as `NIFI-00000`
   - [X] Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such `NIFI-00000`
   
   ### Pull Request Formatting
   
   - [X] Pull Request based on current revision of the `main` branch
   - [X] Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes
   
   # Verification
   
   Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.
   
   ### Build
   
   - [ ] Build completed using `mvn clean install -P contrib-check`
     - [ ] JDK 11
     - [ ] JDK 17
   
   ### Licensing
   
   - [ ] New dependencies are compatible with the [Apache License 2.0](https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0) according to the [License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html)
   - [ ] New dependencies are documented in applicable `LICENSE` and `NOTICE` files
   
   ### Documentation
   
   - [ ] Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [nifi] mattyb149 commented on pull request #7329: NIFI-11630 Deprecate ECMAScript Script Engine

Posted by "mattyb149 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
mattyb149 commented on PR #7329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7329#issuecomment-1575221780

   I'm good with it as-is, just wanted to make it known *why* something was being deprecated.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [nifi] exceptionfactory commented on pull request #7329: NIFI-11630 Deprecate ECMAScript Script Engine

Posted by "exceptionfactory (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
exceptionfactory commented on PR #7329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7329#issuecomment-1575199604

   > Should we apply this PR to `main` as well, even if it will be removed before the first 2.0 release, just to make sure they're in sync at this moment? Also should we append to the property's description some generic "this is deprecated and is subject to being removed in a later release" to go along with the `DEPRECATED` addition to the display name?
   
   Thanks for the feedback @mattyb149. I was thinking that this doesn't need to be applied to the `main` branch, but as a sort of TODO marker, it could be applied to the `main` branch, and then a follow up PR can implement the removal for 2.0.
   
   I am not opposed to adding more details to the description, but as this also includes a warning for the nifi-deprecation.log, I think that will actually be a better pointer to indicate the need for making changes.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [nifi] mattyb149 closed pull request #7329: NIFI-11630 Deprecate ECMAScript Script Engine

Posted by "mattyb149 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
mattyb149 closed pull request #7329: NIFI-11630 Deprecate ECMAScript Script Engine
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7329


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [nifi] mattyb149 commented on pull request #7329: NIFI-11630 Deprecate ECMAScript Script Engine

Posted by "mattyb149 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
mattyb149 commented on PR #7329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7329#issuecomment-1575193559

   Should we apply this PR to `main` as well, even if it will be removed before the first 2.0 release, just to make sure they're in sync at this moment? Also should we append to the property's description some generic "this is deprecated and is subject to being removed in a later release" to go along with the `DEPRECATED` addition to the display name?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [nifi] mattyb149 commented on pull request #7329: NIFI-11630 Deprecate ECMAScript Script Engine

Posted by "mattyb149 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
mattyb149 commented on PR #7329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7329#issuecomment-1577066158

   +1 LGTM, merging to support/nifi-1.x


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org