You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by "Thomas Jungblut (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/09/29 14:48:45 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (HAMA-439) Reorganize modules for YARN/MR-NextGen integration

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Thomas Jungblut resolved HAMA-439.
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    
> Reorganize modules for YARN/MR-NextGen integration
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-439
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Thomas Jungblut
>             Fix For: 0.4.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-349-20110927.txt, HAMA-349-move-20110927.sh, HAMA-349-move_v2.patch, HAMA-349-move_v2.sh, HAMA-349-move_v3.patch, HAMA-349-move_v4.patch, HAMA-349-move_v4.sh, HAMA-349-move_v5.patch, HAMA-439.patch
>
>
> I'd like to get started on HamaV2 to work with YARN/MR-nextgen.
> Here's what I think should be the module structure:
>  - *api*: Code from HamaV1 related to APIs that will be moved to this new module. This will mainly have the BSP APIs: _BSP_, _BSPPeerInterface_ and all the related records like _BSPMessage_, _BSPMessageBundle etc.
>  - *core*: Current/HamaV1 server code. Will have the current _BSPMaster_/_GroomServer_ infrastructure. We should probably rename it to {{classic-server}} or something similar.
>  - *server*: New Hama server implementation to work with YARN. Will have _BSPApplicationMaster_, _BSPTask_ and related code.
>  - *client*: Code from HamaV1 related to client that will be moved to this new module. This will mainly have the client-submission classes/interfaces like _BSPJob_, _BSPJobClient_, _JobStatus_ etc. It will be configurable to either run with the classic-server implementation or with YARN.
> There will not be any package changes but only code-moves across modules, so we will be backwards compatible.
> How does it look? Any thoughts/suggestions?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira