You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by Narayanan A R <na...@gmail.com> on 2013/06/20 00:18:58 UTC
2.0.2 release
Hi,
Please schedule a release for 2.0.2. I want to use the callback feature
added to sync() operation.
Thanks,
Nara
Re: 2.0.2 release
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
In this case, following the semantic spec is better than doing something random. It just turns out that I've never followed the spec correctly! (definitely not the first time I only half read something). I'll move this release to 2.1.0.
-JZ
On Jun 19, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see a problem with having a lot of .0 releases. The numbers in
> versions are just that: numbers. If we have supefluous .0 attached to our
> releases, then people specify an extra 2 letters when they type in the
> version. Not the end of the world in my book :).
>
> But, I don't feel too strongly outside of wanting us to consistently follow
> whatever versioning semantics we are following.
>
> --Eric
>
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> I think you're right. I've been using the last digit as a minor change,
>> but it's really for patches. I wonder how many patches we'll actually have,
>> though. Maybe the patch digit can be done away with altogether and we can
>> just use [ma].[mi] versioning.
>>
>> -JZ
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Eric Tschetter <echeddar@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have no objections, but would like to clarify the versioning scheme.
>> If
>>> we are following semantic versioning, then I think those tickets warrant
>> a
>>> 2.1.0.
>>>
>>> --Eric
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Barring any objections, I can start a release on the currently committed
>>>> 2.0.2 tickets:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12324401
>>>>
>>>> -Jordan
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Narayanan A R <
>>>> narayanan.arunachalam@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please schedule a release for 2.0.2. I want to use the callback feature
>>>>> added to sync() operation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Nara
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: 2.0.2 release
Posted by Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>.
I don't see a problem with having a lot of .0 releases. The numbers in
versions are just that: numbers. If we have supefluous .0 attached to our
releases, then people specify an extra 2 letters when they type in the
version. Not the end of the world in my book :).
But, I don't feel too strongly outside of wanting us to consistently follow
whatever versioning semantics we are following.
--Eric
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> I think you're right. I've been using the last digit as a minor change,
> but it's really for patches. I wonder how many patches we'll actually have,
> though. Maybe the patch digit can be done away with altogether and we can
> just use [ma].[mi] versioning.
>
> -JZ
>
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Eric Tschetter <echeddar@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > I have no objections, but would like to clarify the versioning scheme.
> If
> > we are following semantic versioning, then I think those tickets warrant
> a
> > 2.1.0.
> >
> > --Eric
> >
> > On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> >> Barring any objections, I can start a release on the currently committed
> >> 2.0.2 tickets:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12324401
> >>
> >> -Jordan
> >>
> >> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Narayanan A R <
> >> narayanan.arunachalam@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Please schedule a release for 2.0.2. I want to use the callback feature
> >>> added to sync() operation.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Nara
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: 2.0.2 release
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
I think you're right. I've been using the last digit as a minor change, but it's really for patches. I wonder how many patches we'll actually have, though. Maybe the patch digit can be done away with altogether and we can just use [ma].[mi] versioning.
-JZ
On Jun 19, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no objections, but would like to clarify the versioning scheme. If
> we are following semantic versioning, then I think those tickets warrant a
> 2.1.0.
>
> --Eric
>
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> Barring any objections, I can start a release on the currently committed
>> 2.0.2 tickets:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12324401
>>
>> -Jordan
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Narayanan A R <
>> narayanan.arunachalam@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please schedule a release for 2.0.2. I want to use the callback feature
>>> added to sync() operation.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nara
>>
>>
Re: 2.0.2 release
Posted by Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>.
I have no objections, but would like to clarify the versioning scheme. If
we are following semantic versioning, then I think those tickets warrant a
2.1.0.
--Eric
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> Barring any objections, I can start a release on the currently committed
> 2.0.2 tickets:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12324401
>
> -Jordan
>
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Narayanan A R <
> narayanan.arunachalam@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please schedule a release for 2.0.2. I want to use the callback feature
> > added to sync() operation.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nara
>
>
Re: 2.0.2 release
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Barring any objections, I can start a release on the currently committed 2.0.2 tickets:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12324401
-Jordan
On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Narayanan A R <na...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please schedule a release for 2.0.2. I want to use the callback feature
> added to sync() operation.
>
> Thanks,
> Nara