3.2.x branch

["Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <gr...@apache.org>]

On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:

> Looks good. As soon as you make the official announcement I'll create 
> branches/3.2.x in svn and we can start on 3.3.

I don't think we need to wait for the announcement - 3.2.7 is already out 
if you look on the download page, the announcement is more about 
"marketing" if you will.

Grisha

Re: 3.2.x branch

[Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>]

I've created the a 3.2.x branch. Just so we are all clear, the 
branches/3.2.x branch gets bug fixes *only*. This will be the source 
repository for future 3.2 bug fix releases. New features and major code 
modifications continue to go into trunk.

I think any other new branches we create such as a 3.3 experimental 
module import branch should start with an alpha character so the stable 
3.x.x branches  don't get lost in the noise. eg.

experimental-3.3

but not:

3.3-experimental

Jim

Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> 
>> Looks good. As soon as you make the official announcement I'll create 
>> branches/3.2.x in svn and we can start on 3.3.
> 
> 
> I don't think we need to wait for the announcement - 3.2.7 is already 
> out if you look on the download page, the announcement is more about 
> "marketing" if you will.
> 
> Grisha
>