[jira] [Updated] (FOP-2402) footnotes overlap regular content

["Andreas L. Delmelle (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andreas L. Delmelle updated FOP-2402:
-------------------------------------
    Attachment: FOP-2402.pdf


I may have some good news... On my end, it renders as in attach. 
The only potential issue I still see is that the superscript footnote label on the second page is clipped, but that is due to the "line-height-shift-adjustment" specified on the root. If you remove that, then the result looks slightly better.

Now, the reason this appears 'fixed' on my end, is because I locally have the changes for proper orphans and widows handling incorporated in my local copy.

Can you try to apply the patch attached to FOP-1488 to confirm?

Note - Just confirmed that this would still pose a problem if the user forces widows and orphans to 1, which would trigger the behaviour of current trunk. For the case as attached, default values of 2 for each of the properties should be respected, which FOP 2.1 does not yet properly implement.
Also note that just removing the "line-height-shift-adjustment" appears to trigger another bug, where some content is dropped, i.e. the second page appears blank...?

> footnotes overlap regular content
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOP-2402
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2402
>             Project: FOP
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: layout/block
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>         Environment: Ubuntu 14.04, Java 1.7.0_55
>            Reporter: Alexey Neyman
>         Attachments: FOP-2402.pdf, bad.fo, bad.pdf
>
>
> We've noticed yet another issue with the rendering of the footnotes where the footnote is rendered over the regular content. Verified with top-of-trunk FOP, r1615966. Please refer to the attached FO/PDF files.
>  
> Curiously, if the last fo:list-item is commented out, the preceding fo:list-items are placed more tightly and as a result, the footnotes do not overlap with the regular content. This suggests that there's a bug in how the space between blocks is calculated, but I haven't debugged it further yet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)