You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Grégory Joseph <jo...@gmail.com> on 2006/01/18 22:20:50 UTC
[jelly] Releases of jelly and jelly-tags-xml ?
Hi list,
As recently and quickly discussed on irc with Dion, I was wondering if
there would be any possible plans for releasing jelly and
jelly-tags-xml. I'm writing as one of the xdoclet2 developers: we
currently depend on post-1.0 snapshots of both of -core and -tags-xml,
and, as you might guess, we'd very much like to switch back to stable
releases.
As far as I can tell, the only reason we use these versions is because
they added support for xsd declarations in generated xml documents.
(And xdoclet2 has plugins to generate j2ee descriptors which require
an xsd declaration)
Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and our test codebase
might help in that respect.
Does this sound feasible / would anyone be interested in pushing this out ?
Thanks,
greg
ps: the snapshots we currently use are actually timestamped versions:
commons-jelly-20050813.225330 & commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Releases of jelly and jelly-tags-xml ?
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
Grégory Joseph wrote:
> Thanks for the status. Sounds like a long chain of release-waiting...
> do you guys have any idea on the release plans of jexl and jaxen ?
>
Unfortunately not since the cycles are missing.
Help on the jexl issue by attempts and suggestions for patches would be
more than welcome.
Just change the project.xml to take jexl as snapshot!
As for Jaxen, maybe we can delay that one... not sure.
All this is out of my head... Have you looked into jira to confirm this
( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY ) ?
thanks
paul
>> Finally, for jelly-1.1, there's this large wish for a more
>> understandable tag-caching which we just haven't done yet... but that
>> could be, maybe, unfortunately, delayed to or 2.0...
>>
>
> I'd be in favor of delaying that indeed ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> greg
>
>
>
>> Diogo Quintela (EF) wrote:
>>
>>> I back you up Greg.
>>> Indeed, we are only using those because of core/xml related changes (xml
>>> pipeline / xml namespace) introduced to support those xsd declarations
>>> (but are by far more than that)
>>>
>>> Paul Libbrecht has worked on those
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-214
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-213
>>>
>>> Regarding releasing as RC, I am +1 on this, but after-all, that's only my
>>> silent vote :-)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Diogo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi list,
>>>>
>>>> As recently and quickly discussed on irc with Dion, I was wondering if
>>>> there would be any possible plans for releasing jelly and
>>>> jelly-tags-xml. I'm writing as one of the xdoclet2 developers: we
>>>> currently depend on post-1.0 snapshots of both of -core and -tags-xml,
>>>> and, as you might guess, we'd very much like to switch back to stable
>>>> releases.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I can tell, the only reason we use these versions is because
>>>> they added support for xsd declarations in generated xml documents.
>>>> (And xdoclet2 has plugins to generate j2ee descriptors which require
>>>> an xsd declaration)
>>>>
>>>> Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and our test codebase
>>>> might help in that respect.
>>>>
>>>> Does this sound feasible / would anyone be interested in pushing this out
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ps: the snapshots we currently use are actually timestamped versions:
>>>> commons-jelly-20050813.225330 & commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Releases of jelly and jelly-tags-xml ?
Posted by Grégory Joseph <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Paul,
On 20/01/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> There's at least a major issue to be solved before a release of jelly
> and jelly-xml: Gump testing, including the usage of the latest jexl as
> well as hope for a release of jaxen.
>
> The problems is that many unit-tests currently fail because jexl now
> handles correctly primitive types but then may be wrong add doing
> equality of expressions using primitive number types.
>
> As for jaxen, the problem is just that we wish to be using... a release.
>
Thanks for the status. Sounds like a long chain of release-waiting...
do you guys have any idea on the release plans of jexl and jaxen ?
> Finally, for jelly-1.1, there's this large wish for a more
> understandable tag-caching which we just haven't done yet... but that
> could be, maybe, unfortunately, delayed to or 2.0...
I'd be in favor of delaying that indeed ;-)
Cheers,
greg
> Diogo Quintela (EF) wrote:
> > I back you up Greg.
> > Indeed, we are only using those because of core/xml related changes (xml
> > pipeline / xml namespace) introduced to support those xsd declarations
> > (but are by far more than that)
> >
> > Paul Libbrecht has worked on those
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-214
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-213
> >
> > Regarding releasing as RC, I am +1 on this, but after-all, that's only my
> > silent vote :-)
> >
> > Regards
> > Diogo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> As recently and quickly discussed on irc with Dion, I was wondering if
> >> there would be any possible plans for releasing jelly and
> >> jelly-tags-xml. I'm writing as one of the xdoclet2 developers: we
> >> currently depend on post-1.0 snapshots of both of -core and -tags-xml,
> >> and, as you might guess, we'd very much like to switch back to stable
> >> releases.
> >>
> >> As far as I can tell, the only reason we use these versions is because
> >> they added support for xsd declarations in generated xml documents.
> >> (And xdoclet2 has plugins to generate j2ee descriptors which require
> >> an xsd declaration)
> >>
> >> Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and our test codebase
> >> might help in that respect.
> >>
> >> Does this sound feasible / would anyone be interested in pushing this out
> >> ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> greg
> >>
> >>
> >> ps: the snapshots we currently use are actually timestamped versions:
> >> commons-jelly-20050813.225330 & commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Releases of jelly and jelly-tags-xml ?
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
There's at least a major issue to be solved before a release of jelly
and jelly-xml: Gump testing, including the usage of the latest jexl as
well as hope for a release of jaxen.
The problems is that many unit-tests currently fail because jexl now
handles correctly primitive types but then may be wrong add doing
equality of expressions using primitive number types.
As for jaxen, the problem is just that we wish to be using... a release.
Finally, for jelly-1.1, there's this large wish for a more
understandable tag-caching which we just haven't done yet... but that
could be, maybe, unfortunately, delayed to or 2.0...
paul
Diogo Quintela (EF) wrote:
> I back you up Greg.
> Indeed, we are only using those because of core/xml related changes (xml
> pipeline / xml namespace) introduced to support those xsd declarations
> (but are by far more than that)
>
> Paul Libbrecht has worked on those
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-214
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-213
>
> Regarding releasing as RC, I am +1 on this, but after-all, that's only my
> silent vote :-)
>
> Regards
> Diogo
>
>
>
>
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> As recently and quickly discussed on irc with Dion, I was wondering if
>> there would be any possible plans for releasing jelly and
>> jelly-tags-xml. I'm writing as one of the xdoclet2 developers: we
>> currently depend on post-1.0 snapshots of both of -core and -tags-xml,
>> and, as you might guess, we'd very much like to switch back to stable
>> releases.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the only reason we use these versions is because
>> they added support for xsd declarations in generated xml documents.
>> (And xdoclet2 has plugins to generate j2ee descriptors which require
>> an xsd declaration)
>>
>> Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and our test codebase
>> might help in that respect.
>>
>> Does this sound feasible / would anyone be interested in pushing this out
>> ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> greg
>>
>>
>> ps: the snapshots we currently use are actually timestamped versions:
>> commons-jelly-20050813.225330 & commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Releases of jelly and jelly-tags-xml ?
Posted by "Diogo Quintela (EF)" <di...@ef.pt>.
I back you up Greg.
Indeed, we are only using those because of core/xml related changes (xml
pipeline / xml namespace) introduced to support those xsd declarations
(but are by far more than that)
Paul Libbrecht has worked on those
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-214
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-213
Regarding releasing as RC, I am +1 on this, but after-all, that's only my
silent vote :-)
Regards
Diogo
> Hi list,
>
> As recently and quickly discussed on irc with Dion, I was wondering if
> there would be any possible plans for releasing jelly and
> jelly-tags-xml. I'm writing as one of the xdoclet2 developers: we
> currently depend on post-1.0 snapshots of both of -core and -tags-xml,
> and, as you might guess, we'd very much like to switch back to stable
> releases.
>
> As far as I can tell, the only reason we use these versions is because
> they added support for xsd declarations in generated xml documents.
> (And xdoclet2 has plugins to generate j2ee descriptors which require
> an xsd declaration)
>
> Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and our test codebase
> might help in that respect.
>
> Does this sound feasible / would anyone be interested in pushing this out
> ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> greg
>
>
> ps: the snapshots we currently use are actually timestamped versions:
> commons-jelly-20050813.225330 & commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Releases of jelly and jelly-tags-xml ?
Posted by Konstantin Priblouda <kp...@yahoo.com>.
--- Grégory Joseph <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and
> our test codebase
> might help in that respect.
>
> Does this sound feasible / would anyone be
> interested in pushing this out ?
As we are used to live off their snapshots, we will
get no
more problems that we already have :)
I'm +1 to push them with RC.
regards,
----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality.
check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org