You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Trustin Lee (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/11/06 05:45:50 UTC
[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (DIRMINA-463) Find the best way to
specify both MINA and non-MINA events.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540330 ]
trustin edited comment on DIRMINA-463 at 11/5/07 8:44 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent! and a few tiny comments... :)
1) We are now tightly-coupled with mina-core. Are you sure about this?
2) WDYT about removing FILTER_ prefix to get aligned with org.apache.mina.common.IoEventType?
was (Author: trustin):
A few comments:
1) We are now tightly-coupled with mina-core. Are you sure about this?
2) WDYT about removing FILTER_ prefix to get aligned with org.apache.mina.common.IoEventType?
> Find the best way to specify both MINA and non-MINA events.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-463
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-463
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Statemachine
> Reporter: Trustin Lee
> Assignee: Niklas Therning
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-M1
>
>
> As discussed here: http://tinyurl.com/2omrl9
> For now, we use String to identify event types, which is somewhat unsafe. Using an enum might be useful, but there are a few disadvantages:
> * Wildcard event type cannot be used, which could be extended further (e.g. "message*" or "session(Opened|Closed)")
> Probably sticking to String might be the best solution? :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.