You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@oodt.apache.org by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/21 03:44:52 UTC
Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Hi All,
Does anyone have advice for the above please?
I see the following in filemgr pom.xml
solr-solrj: 1.3.0
solr-core: 1.3.0
lucene-core: 2.0.0
I've never used Solr or Lucene libraries that old before and wonder if
anyone if using more recent libraries?
I would be interested in upgrading this stuff to 4.X.
Thank you
Lewis
--
*Lewis*
Re: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
Hi Cameron,
Thanks for feedback.
I'm working on hooking up a dump of my growing metadata catalogue and well
document my progress with more recent Solr versions.
Thanks for feedback.
Lewis
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Cameron Goodale <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> I haven't seen anyone use a newer version of Lucene. I think that Paul
> Ramirez has used a recent version of solr to provide a search interface
> after reading from Lucene, but this has been done outside of FileManager.
>
> Paul can give you more details on the actual setups / installs he did. I
> hope others on this list with SOLR experience can chime in as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Cam
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Does anyone have advice for the above please?
>> I see the following in filemgr pom.xml
>> solr-solrj: 1.3.0
>> solr-core: 1.3.0
>> lucene-core: 2.0.0
>> I've never used Solr or Lucene libraries that old before and wonder if
>> anyone if using more recent libraries?
>> I would be interested in upgrading this stuff to 4.X.
>> Thank you
>> Lewis
>>
>> --
>> *Lewis*
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String
>
>
--
*Lewis*
Re: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
Hi Cameron,
Thanks for feedback.
I'm working on hooking up a dump of my growing metadata catalogue and well
document my progress with more recent Solr versions.
Thanks for feedback.
Lewis
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Cameron Goodale <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> I haven't seen anyone use a newer version of Lucene. I think that Paul
> Ramirez has used a recent version of solr to provide a search interface
> after reading from Lucene, but this has been done outside of FileManager.
>
> Paul can give you more details on the actual setups / installs he did. I
> hope others on this list with SOLR experience can chime in as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Cam
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Does anyone have advice for the above please?
>> I see the following in filemgr pom.xml
>> solr-solrj: 1.3.0
>> solr-core: 1.3.0
>> lucene-core: 2.0.0
>> I've never used Solr or Lucene libraries that old before and wonder if
>> anyone if using more recent libraries?
>> I would be interested in upgrading this stuff to 4.X.
>> Thank you
>> Lewis
>>
>> --
>> *Lewis*
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String
>
>
--
*Lewis*
Re: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Posted by Cameron Goodale <si...@gmail.com>.
Hey Lewis,
I haven't seen anyone use a newer version of Lucene. I think that Paul
Ramirez has used a recent version of solr to provide a search interface
after reading from Lucene, but this has been done outside of FileManager.
Paul can give you more details on the actual setups / installs he did. I
hope others on this list with SOLR experience can chime in as well.
Cheers,
Cam
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Does anyone have advice for the above please?
> I see the following in filemgr pom.xml
> solr-solrj: 1.3.0
> solr-core: 1.3.0
> lucene-core: 2.0.0
> I've never used Solr or Lucene libraries that old before and wonder if
> anyone if using more recent libraries?
> I would be interested in upgrading this stuff to 4.X.
> Thank you
> Lewis
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>
--
Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String
Re: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Posted by Cameron Goodale <si...@gmail.com>.
Hey Lewis,
I haven't seen anyone use a newer version of Lucene. I think that Paul
Ramirez has used a recent version of solr to provide a search interface
after reading from Lucene, but this has been done outside of FileManager.
Paul can give you more details on the actual setups / installs he did. I
hope others on this list with SOLR experience can chime in as well.
Cheers,
Cam
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Does anyone have advice for the above please?
> I see the following in filemgr pom.xml
> solr-solrj: 1.3.0
> solr-core: 1.3.0
> lucene-core: 2.0.0
> I've never used Solr or Lucene libraries that old before and wonder if
> anyone if using more recent libraries?
> I would be interested in upgrading this stuff to 4.X.
> Thank you
> Lewis
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>
--
Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String
Re: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hey Lewis,
I believe the solr dependency in File Manager is to the 1.3.0 solrj client,
which I believe is forwards wire compat with newer versions of Solr (even 4?)
The lucene core 2.0.0 dep is to write FM catalogs in Lucene and yes it's old and
needs to be upgraded desperately. ;/
+1 to upgrading to 4.x all around if you can create an issue and patch it up!
Cheers,
Chris
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "user@oodt.apache.org<ma...@oodt.apache.org>" <us...@oodt.apache.org>>
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:44 PM
To: "user@oodt.apache.org<ma...@oodt.apache.org>" <us...@oodt.apache.org>>
Subject: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Hi All,
Does anyone have advice for the above please?
I see the following in filemgr pom.xml
solr-solrj: 1.3.0
solr-core: 1.3.0
lucene-core: 2.0.0
I've never used Solr or Lucene libraries that old before and wonder if anyone if using more recent libraries?
I would be interested in upgrading this stuff to 4.X.
Thank you
Lewis
--
Lewis
Re: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hey Lewis,
I believe the solr dependency in File Manager is to the 1.3.0 solrj client,
which I believe is forwards wire compat with newer versions of Solr (even 4?)
The lucene core 2.0.0 dep is to write FM catalogs in Lucene and yes it's old and
needs to be upgraded desperately. ;/
+1 to upgrading to 4.x all around if you can create an issue and patch it up!
Cheers,
Chris
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "user@oodt.apache.org<ma...@oodt.apache.org>" <us...@oodt.apache.org>>
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:44 PM
To: "user@oodt.apache.org<ma...@oodt.apache.org>" <us...@oodt.apache.org>>
Subject: Recommended Solr Version for use within OODT
Hi All,
Does anyone have advice for the above please?
I see the following in filemgr pom.xml
solr-solrj: 1.3.0
solr-core: 1.3.0
lucene-core: 2.0.0
I've never used Solr or Lucene libraries that old before and wonder if anyone if using more recent libraries?
I would be interested in upgrading this stuff to 4.X.
Thank you
Lewis
--
Lewis