You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> on 2010/05/24 16:09:52 UTC
Re: svn commit: r946147 - in /geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1: LICENSE NOTICE pom.xml
On May 19, 2010, at 8:15 AM, rickmcguire@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rickmcguire
> Date: Wed May 19 12:15:04 2010
> New Revision: 946147
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=946147&view=rev
> Log:
> update LICENSE/NOTICE files for latest dependency versions
>
> Modified:
> geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1/LICENSE
> geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1/NOTICE
> geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1/pom.xml
Rick,
Many thanks for working on license and notice files!
In 2.2, we separated our source and binary license/notice files. This seems to have recombined them. I think they should be separated.
Oh, perhaps the 2.2 license/notice files weren't properly ported to trunk? And you were following the template that were already in place? Take a look at the 2.2 LICENSE/NOTICE files and let me know what you think.
--kevan
Re: svn commit: r946147 - in /geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1: LICENSE
NOTICE pom.xml
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 5/24/2010 10:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On May 19, 2010, at 8:15 AM, rickmcguire@apache.org wrote:
>
>
>> Author: rickmcguire
>> Date: Wed May 19 12:15:04 2010
>> New Revision: 946147
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=946147&view=rev
>> Log:
>> update LICENSE/NOTICE files for latest dependency versions
>>
>> Modified:
>> geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1/LICENSE
>> geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1/NOTICE
>> geronimo/server/branches/3.0-M1/pom.xml
>>
> Rick,
> Many thanks for working on license and notice files!
>
> In 2.2, we separated our source and binary license/notice files. This seems to have recombined them. I think they should be separated.
>
> Oh, perhaps the 2.2 license/notice files weren't properly ported to trunk? And you were following the template that were already in place? Take a look at the 2.2 LICENSE/NOTICE files and let me know what you think.
>
I certainly was following the template that was already here in 3.0, so
I guess the changes never got ported into 3.0. I'll take a look at how
this was handled in 2.2.
Rick
> --kevan
>