You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Hyukjin Kwon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/19 11:52:25 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-14525) DataFrameWriter's save method should delegate to jdbc for jdbc datasource

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247448#comment-15247448 ] 

Hyukjin Kwon edited comment on SPARK-14525 at 4/19/16 9:52 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Shouldn't we then deprecate the support for {{read.format("jdbc")}} if {{Properties}} is not guaranteed to be converted to {{String}}?


was (Author: hyukjin.kwon):
Shouldn't we then deprecate the support for {{read.format("jdbc")} if {{Properties}} is not guaranteed to be converted to {{String}}?

> DataFrameWriter's save method should delegate to jdbc for jdbc datasource
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-14525
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14525
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>            Reporter: Justin Pihony
>            Priority: Minor
>
> If you call {code}df.write.format("jdbc")...save(){code} then you get an error  
> bq. org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.DefaultSource does not allow create table as select
> save is a more intuitive guess on the appropriate method to call, so the user should not be punished for not knowing about the jdbc method. 
> Obviously, this will require the caller to have set up the correct parameters for jdbc to work :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org