You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Hyukjin Kwon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/19 11:52:25 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-14525) DataFrameWriter's save method
should delegate to jdbc for jdbc datasource
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247448#comment-15247448 ]
Hyukjin Kwon edited comment on SPARK-14525 at 4/19/16 9:52 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Shouldn't we then deprecate the support for {{read.format("jdbc")}} if {{Properties}} is not guaranteed to be converted to {{String}}?
was (Author: hyukjin.kwon):
Shouldn't we then deprecate the support for {{read.format("jdbc")} if {{Properties}} is not guaranteed to be converted to {{String}}?
> DataFrameWriter's save method should delegate to jdbc for jdbc datasource
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-14525
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14525
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 1.6.1
> Reporter: Justin Pihony
> Priority: Minor
>
> If you call {code}df.write.format("jdbc")...save(){code} then you get an error
> bq. org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.DefaultSource does not allow create table as select
> save is a more intuitive guess on the appropriate method to call, so the user should not be punished for not knowing about the jdbc method.
> Obviously, this will require the caller to have set up the correct parameters for jdbc to work :)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org