You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Rick <rs...@rematch.nl> on 2001/04/20 12:15:47 UTC
New to user-mailing-list
Hi people,
I'm new to the Tomcat-user-list,
main reason for this was ofcourse an annoying problem with installing Tomcat
the way I want.
I was hoping somebody reading this mail could help me.
My situation is as followes:
I want a JSP Server on Linux with Apache for better stability
I have:
- Red Hat 7.0 (installed without X-Windows)
- MySQL 3.23.35 (RPM)
- Apache 1.3.19 + Php-4.0.4pl1 ( Installed according to docs on
http://www.php.net )
- JDK 1.3 (RPM) fixed the "libstc++-glibc6 versionproblem"
- Tomcat 3.2.1 (Binary dist)
Tomcat works fine
Apache works fine
PHP works fine
MySQL works fine
BUT ... I want to use mod_jk.so for Tomcat/Apache connection
this is where it goes wrong. As far as I understand self-compiling mod_jk.so
is not necissary
(even if I wanted to ... Apache doesnt support DSO here)
I did this:
- move mod_jk.so to: /apache/libexec/
- Start Tomcat
- edit httpd.conf and add the line: Include
"/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/conf.mod_jk.conf-auto"
- Start Apache
apache wouldn't start..
this is my Consoledump.
====================================================
Sytax error on line 8 of /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto:
Invalid
command 'LoadModule', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
included in the serverconfiguration
./apachectl start: httpd could not be started
===========================================================
If anybody knows what my problem is or can give me any suggestions...plz
tell me !
Thnx in advance
Rick
Re: New to user-mailing-list
Posted by Rick <rs...@rematch.nl>.
would that be the:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=most ?
(you could just told me =)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ansgar W. Konermann" <an...@inf.tu-dresden.de>
To: <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: New to user-mailing-list
> Hello Rick, hi all,
>
> > Rick wrote:
> [...]
> > (even if I wanted to ... Apache doesnt support DSO here)
>
> As I understand it, DSO means support for dynamic shared
> objects - and mod_jk.so is a dynamic shared object (hence
> the filename .so for Shared Object).
>
> So if Apache does not support DSO, it does not support
> configuration commands which load DSOs, like "LoadModule"
> is one.
>
> > command 'LoadModule', perhaps mis-spelled
> > or defined by a module not included in the serverconfiguration
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I suppose that's it...
>
> > If anybody knows what my problem is or can give me any suggestions...plz
> > tell me !
>
> Get an Apache with DSO support enabled, or compile it for yourself if you
> like.
>
> HIH
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Ansgar W. Konermann
>
> --- Hello, I am a message footer. -------------------------------------
>
Re: New to user-mailing-list
Posted by "Ansgar W. Konermann" <an...@inf.tu-dresden.de>.
Hello Rick, hi all,
> Rick wrote:
[...]
> (even if I wanted to ... Apache doesnt support DSO here)
As I understand it, DSO means support for dynamic shared
objects - and mod_jk.so is a dynamic shared object (hence
the filename .so for Shared Object).
So if Apache does not support DSO, it does not support
configuration commands which load DSOs, like "LoadModule"
is one.
> command 'LoadModule', perhaps mis-spelled
> or defined by a module not included in the serverconfiguration
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I suppose that's it...
> If anybody knows what my problem is or can give me any suggestions...plz
> tell me !
Get an Apache with DSO support enabled, or compile it for yourself if you
like.
HIH
--
Best regards,
Ansgar W. Konermann
--- Hello, I am a message footer. -------------------------------------