Re: [SPAM] RE: spam blacklists

[Kraig Schario <ct...@cinti.net>]

What protocol does James use to contact the blacklist servers: HTTP, SMTP,
FTP?
It is possible that a firewall is blocking communication to the Blacklist
servers.

Kraig

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Burkart" <kb...@hotmail.com>
To: <se...@james.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:09 PM
Subject: [SPAM] RE: spam blacklists


> Steve,
>
> I have the same blacklists set up and nothing gets filtered to the spam
> folder. I am getting aroung 100-200 spam emails a day I'm tired of
manually
> deleting them.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> >From: "Steve Brewin" <sb...@synsys.com>
> >Reply-To: <sb...@synsys.com>
> >To: "'James Users List'" <se...@james.apache.org>
> >Subject: RE: spam blacklists
> >Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:42:14 +0100
> >
> >Kevin Burkart wrote:
> > > Can someone help me set up a spam blacklist. I am using suse
> > > linux. I have
> > > tried spamhuas and spamcop. One sends everything to spam and one sends
> > > nothing to spam. Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> >The InSpammerBlacklist matcher works for me, of which there are commented
> >out examples in the default config.xml in the James distribution. eg:
> >
> ><mailet match="InSpammerBlacklist=dnsbl.njabl.org"
> >                  class="ToProcessor">
> >            <processor> spam </processor>
> >            <notice>550 Requested action not taken: rejected - see
> >http://njabl.org/ </notice>
> >          </mailet>
> >
> >I am using sbl.spamhaus.org, dnsbl.njabl.org and relays.ordb.org.
> >
> >One caveat. I'm not collecting statistics on the hits that each of the
> >above
> >are producing. I simply see that this combination pretty reliably weeds
out
> >the majority of spam while not mis-classifying legitimate mail.
> >
> >I've never experienced everything being sent to spam. This could be
> >something to do with your configuration or choice of RBL. As most sites
> >support a web-based query system I would suggest trying that to
understand
> >how your chosen RBLs are interpreting what you consider to be a
legitimate
> >address and then work backwards to identify where things are going wrong.
> >
> >-- Steve
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
> Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org

Phoenix processes

[Matt Anderson <mu...@swiftdsl.com.au>]

Hi All,

Is there a reason why in linux when you run James you get so many processes
whilst in windows you only get the one? I know this maybe a naive sort of
question but it is curiousity more than anything. Thanks for your time and I
look forward to hearing from you.

Kindest Regards,
Matt Anderson


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org

RE: [SPAM] RE: spam blacklists

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

> What protocol does James use to contact the blacklist servers

DNS lookups.

	--- Noel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org