[HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

[Saurav Lahiri <sa...@sungard.com>]

Hi Sanjay,
I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack-1047 -
tracking in logs using job id ]. From the defect history it appears that
the change corresponded to
setting job-<id>=[<uuid>].

Currently the changes dont appear to be there in the master in
the ./framework/jobs/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/jobs/impl/AsyncJobManagerImpl.java
file. Could you please let me know what I am missing here. This is to help
me in identifying the best approach to fix cloudstack-3471.

Thanks in advance.

Saurav

Re: [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

[Saurav Lahiri <sa...@sungard.com>]

Sanjay,
Thank you for the clarfication. I have created a ticket CLOUDSTACK-5410 to
track this one.

Saurav


On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Sanjay Tripathi
<sa...@citrix.com>wrote:

>  Hi Saurav,
>
>
>
> After the CS got switched to use new jobs framework, the
> AsyncJobManagerImpl.java file got moved under framework package; but the
> changes which I committed are not there in the file, somebody must have
> missed it during the transition.
>
>
>
> I’ll port the same changes in the new jobs framework, so that we can have
> UUIDs in our logs. Can you please open a ticket to track this issue.
>
>
>
> --Sanjay
>
>
>
> *From:* Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lahiri@sungard.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:53 PM
> *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi
> *Subject:* [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047
>
>
>
> Hi Sanjay,
>
> I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack-1047 -
> tracking in logs using job id ]. From the defect history it appears that
> the change corresponded to
>
> setting job-<id>=[<uuid>].
>
>
>
> Currently the changes dont appear to be there in the master in
> the ./framework/jobs/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/jobs/impl/AsyncJobManagerImpl.java
> file. Could you please let me know what I am missing here. This is to help
> me in identifying the best approach to fix cloudstack-3471.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Saurav
>

Re: [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

[Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>]

Sanjay - while porting the changes can you please atleast skip porting -
NDC.push("job-" + jobId + " = [ " + jobUuid + " ]");
We don¹t every line of log to have the job id and corresponding uuid. Just
the very first line saying that this jobId corresponding uuid is some uuid
is fine.
 
Thanks,
-Nitin

On 07/12/13 1:33 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" <sa...@citrix.com> wrote:

>Hi Saurav,
>
>After the CS got switched to use new jobs framework, the
>AsyncJobManagerImpl.java file got moved under framework package; but the
>changes which I committed are not there in the file, somebody must have
>missed it during the transition.
>
>I'll port the same changes in the new jobs framework, so that we can have
>UUIDs in our logs. Can you please open a ticket to track this issue.
>
>--Sanjay
>
>From: Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lahiri@sungard.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:53 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi
>Subject: [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047
>
>Hi Sanjay,
>I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack-1047 -
>tracking in logs using job id ]. From the defect history it appears that
>the change corresponded to
>setting job-<id>=[<uuid>].
>
>Currently the changes dont appear to be there in the master in the
>./framework/jobs/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/jobs/impl/AsyncJobMan
>agerImpl.java file. Could you please let me know what I am missing here.
>This is to help me in identifying the best approach to fix
>cloudstack-3471.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Saurav

RE: [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

[Sanjay Tripathi <sa...@citrix.com>]

Hi Saurav,

After the CS got switched to use new jobs framework, the AsyncJobManagerImpl.java file got moved under framework package; but the changes which I committed are not there in the file, somebody must have missed it during the transition.

I'll port the same changes in the new jobs framework, so that we can have UUIDs in our logs. Can you please open a ticket to track this issue.

--Sanjay

From: Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lahiri@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:53 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi
Subject: [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

Hi Sanjay,
I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack-1047 - tracking in logs using job id ]. From the defect history it appears that the change corresponded to
setting job-<id>=[<uuid>].

Currently the changes dont appear to be there in the master in the ./framework/jobs/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/jobs/impl/AsyncJobManagerImpl.java file. Could you please let me know what I am missing here. This is to help me in identifying the best approach to fix cloudstack-3471.

Thanks in advance.

Saurav