You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> on 2013/01/02 00:15:08 UTC
Re: Logging
Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for use SLF4J
> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if we
> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J myself so
> I'm fine with this approach.
is there something visible somewhere?
I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists nor any
code in slf4j git repo
resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid method
or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private method
invocation through reflection
how are we supposed to work on this?
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Logging
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
yes, I'm stuck with classloader isolation MNG-5406
I don't see how to add a classworlds rule to do that
if you can help me find the proper way to to it, it would be nice, please
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 6 janvier 2013 08:44:25 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> Cool, do you still need help with the classloader isolation? If not I'll
> move on to the Aether work.
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:52 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> > done in 72bdc8602e5112aa273adc46b06d41c41f0f64a8
> >
> > resetting slf4j factory wasn't sufficient: needed to so the same for
> > slf4j-
> > simple, with same technique
> >
> > Core ITs now run on my machine: great!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > Le mercredi 2 janvier 2013 08:20:12 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> >> yes, Maven isn't an app server, strict security manager shouldn't be an
> >> issue: if someone knows of a situation where it would be, please tell it
> >> :)
> >>
> >> the very good news with this solution is that it is at slf4j-api level,
> >> not
> >> dependent on logging implementation!
> >>
> >> I'll look at it in the WE, if nobody beats me at it: the solution is
> >> crystal clear, anybody interested in doing some code in core should be
> >> able to implement it
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Hervé
> >>
> >> Le mardi 1 janvier 2013 20:58:18 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> >>> It is. You create that package structure in your app to access it.
> >>>
> >>> jvz
> >>>
> >>> On 2013-01-01, at 8:48 PM, Stephen Connolly
> >>
> >> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> If I read that right it is accessing a package local method...
> >>>>
> >>>> That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one)
> >>>> [unless we repackage the api jar] but just wondering if that may affect
> >>>> embedded use?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tuesday, 1 January 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >>>>> On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> >>>>> <herve.boutemy@free.fr<javascript:;>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> >>>>>>> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for
> >>>>>>> use
> >>>>>
> >>>>> SLF4J
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try
> >>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J
> >>>>>>> myself
> >>>>>
> >>>>> so
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm fine with this approach.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> is there something visible somewhere?
> >>>>>> I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists
> >>>>>
> >>>>> nor any
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> code in slf4j git repo
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The suggested solution has existed for two years apparently. There is
> >>>>> no
> >>>>> code that needs to be changed and no features to be added.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid
> >>>>>> method
> >>>>>> or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private
> >>>>>> method
> >>>>>> invocation through reflection
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> how are we supposed to work on this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just take a look at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/test
> >>>>> /
> >>>>> ja
> >>>>> va/org/slf4j/LoggerFactoryFriend.java
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Pretty straight forward. I don't have time to look at it until Friday
> >>>>> but
> >>>>> if want to implement the reset go for it. I'll ping you on Friday to
> >>>>> see
> >>>>> where you are and help out if you need it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hervé
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
> >>>>>> simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >>>>>> <javascript:;>
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>>> dev-help@maven.apache.org<javascript:;>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jason
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> Jason van Zyl
> >>>>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> >>>>> Founder, Apache Maven
> >>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Unknown
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> Founder, Apache Maven
> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead.
>
> -- Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Logging
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io>.
Cool, do you still need help with the classloader isolation? If not I'll move on to the Aether work.
On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:52 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> done in 72bdc8602e5112aa273adc46b06d41c41f0f64a8
>
> resetting slf4j factory wasn't sufficient: needed to so the same for slf4j-
> simple, with same technique
>
> Core ITs now run on my machine: great!
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mercredi 2 janvier 2013 08:20:12 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
>> yes, Maven isn't an app server, strict security manager shouldn't be an
>> issue: if someone knows of a situation where it would be, please tell it :)
>>
>> the very good news with this solution is that it is at slf4j-api level, not
>> dependent on logging implementation!
>>
>> I'll look at it in the WE, if nobody beats me at it: the solution is crystal
>> clear, anybody interested in doing some code in core should be able to
>> implement it
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le mardi 1 janvier 2013 20:58:18 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
>>> It is. You create that package structure in your app to access it.
>>>
>>> jvz
>>>
>>> On 2013-01-01, at 8:48 PM, Stephen Connolly
>>
>> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If I read that right it is accessing a package local method...
>>>>
>>>> That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one)
>>>> [unless we repackage the api jar] but just wondering if that may affect
>>>> embedded use?
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 1 January 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
>>>>> <herve.boutemy@free.fr<javascript:;>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
>>>>>>> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for
>>>>>>> use
>>>>>
>>>>> SLF4J
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J
>>>>>>> myself
>>>>>
>>>>> so
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm fine with this approach.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is there something visible somewhere?
>>>>>> I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists
>>>>>
>>>>> nor any
>>>>>
>>>>>> code in slf4j git repo
>>>>>
>>>>> The suggested solution has existed for two years apparently. There is
>>>>> no
>>>>> code that needs to be changed and no features to be added.
>>>>>
>>>>>> resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid
>>>>>> method
>>>>>> or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private method
>>>>>> invocation through reflection
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how are we supposed to work on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just take a look at:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/test/
>>>>> ja
>>>>> va/org/slf4j/LoggerFactoryFriend.java
>>>>>
>>>>> Pretty straight forward. I don't have time to look at it until Friday
>>>>> but
>>>>> if want to implement the reset go for it. I'll ping you on Friday to
>>>>> see
>>>>> where you are and help out if you need it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hervé
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
>>>>>> simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>>>>> <javascript:;>
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>> dev-help@maven.apache.org<javascript:;>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Jason van Zyl
>>>>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
>>>>> Founder, Apache Maven
>>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Unknown
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder & CTO, Sonatype
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------
Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead.
-- Benjamin Franklin
Re: Logging
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
done in 72bdc8602e5112aa273adc46b06d41c41f0f64a8
resetting slf4j factory wasn't sufficient: needed to so the same for slf4j-
simple, with same technique
Core ITs now run on my machine: great!
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 2 janvier 2013 08:20:12 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> yes, Maven isn't an app server, strict security manager shouldn't be an
> issue: if someone knows of a situation where it would be, please tell it :)
>
> the very good news with this solution is that it is at slf4j-api level, not
> dependent on logging implementation!
>
> I'll look at it in the WE, if nobody beats me at it: the solution is crystal
> clear, anybody interested in doing some code in core should be able to
> implement it
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 1 janvier 2013 20:58:18 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> > It is. You create that package structure in your app to access it.
> >
> > jvz
> >
> > On 2013-01-01, at 8:48 PM, Stephen Connolly
>
> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If I read that right it is accessing a package local method...
> > >
> > > That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one)
> > > [unless we repackage the api jar] but just wondering if that may affect
> > > embedded use?
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, 1 January 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > >> On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> > >> <herve.boutemy@free.fr<javascript:;>>>>
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> > >>>> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for
> > >>>> use
> > >>
> > >> SLF4J
> > >>
> > >>>> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if
> > >>>> we
> > >>>> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J
> > >>>> myself
> > >>
> > >> so
> > >>
> > >>>> I'm fine with this approach.
> > >>>
> > >>> is there something visible somewhere?
> > >>> I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists
> > >>
> > >> nor any
> > >>
> > >>> code in slf4j git repo
> > >>
> > >> The suggested solution has existed for two years apparently. There is
> > >> no
> > >> code that needs to be changed and no features to be added.
> > >>
> > >>> resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid
> > >>> method
> > >>> or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private method
> > >>> invocation through reflection
> > >>>
> > >>> how are we supposed to work on this?
> > >>
> > >> Just take a look at:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/test/
> > >> ja
> > >> va/org/slf4j/LoggerFactoryFriend.java
> > >>
> > >> Pretty straight forward. I don't have time to look at it until Friday
> > >> but
> > >> if want to implement the reset go for it. I'll ping you on Friday to
> > >> see
> > >> where you are and help out if you need it.
> > >>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Hervé
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
> > >>> simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > >>> <javascript:;>
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>> dev-help@maven.apache.org<javascript:;>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Jason
> > >>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> Jason van Zyl
> > >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> > >> Founder, Apache Maven
> > >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
> > >>
> > >> -- Unknown
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Logging
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
yes, Maven isn't an app server, strict security manager shouldn't be an issue:
if someone knows of a situation where it would be, please tell it :)
the very good news with this solution is that it is at slf4j-api level, not
dependent on logging implementation!
I'll look at it in the WE, if nobody beats me at it: the solution is crystal
clear, anybody interested in doing some code in core should be able to
implement it
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 1 janvier 2013 20:58:18 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> It is. You create that package structure in your app to access it.
>
> jvz
>
> On 2013-01-01, at 8:48 PM, Stephen Connolly
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If I read that right it is accessing a package local method...
> >
> > That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one)
> > [unless we repackage the api jar] but just wondering if that may affect
> > embedded use?
> >
> > On Tuesday, 1 January 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >> On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> >> <herve.boutemy@free.fr<javascript:;>>>>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> >>>> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for use
> >>
> >> SLF4J
> >>
> >>>> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if
> >>>> we
> >>>> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J myself
> >>
> >> so
> >>
> >>>> I'm fine with this approach.
> >>>
> >>> is there something visible somewhere?
> >>> I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists
> >>
> >> nor any
> >>
> >>> code in slf4j git repo
> >>
> >> The suggested solution has existed for two years apparently. There is no
> >> code that needs to be changed and no features to be added.
> >>
> >>> resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid
> >>> method
> >>> or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private method
> >>> invocation through reflection
> >>>
> >>> how are we supposed to work on this?
> >>
> >> Just take a look at:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/test/ja
> >> va/org/slf4j/LoggerFactoryFriend.java
> >>
> >> Pretty straight forward. I don't have time to look at it until Friday but
> >> if want to implement the reset go for it. I'll ping you on Friday to see
> >> where you are and help out if you need it.
> >>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Hervé
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
> >>> simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org<javascript:;>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> Jason van Zyl
> >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> >> Founder, Apache Maven
> >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
> >>
> >> -- Unknown
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Logging
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io>.
It is. You create that package structure in your app to access it.
jvz
On 2013-01-01, at 8:48 PM, Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I read that right it is accessing a package local method...
>
> That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one)
> [unless we repackage the api jar] but just wondering if that may affect
> embedded use?
>
> On Tuesday, 1 January 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.boutemy@free.fr<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
>>>> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for use
>> SLF4J
>>>> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if we
>>>> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J myself
>> so
>>>> I'm fine with this approach.
>>> is there something visible somewhere?
>>> I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists
>> nor any
>>> code in slf4j git repo
>>
>> The suggested solution has existed for two years apparently. There is no
>> code that needs to be changed and no features to be added.
>>
>>>
>>> resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid method
>>> or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private method
>>> invocation through reflection
>>>
>>> how are we supposed to work on this?
>>
>> Just take a look at:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/test/java/org/slf4j/LoggerFactoryFriend.java
>>
>> Pretty straight forward. I don't have time to look at it until Friday but
>> if want to implement the reset go for it. I'll ping you on Friday to see
>> where you are and help out if you need it.
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hervé
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
>>> simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org<javascript:;>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason van Zyl
>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
>> Founder, Apache Maven
>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
>>
>> -- Unknown
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Logging
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
If I read that right it is accessing a package local method...
That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one)
[unless we repackage the api jar] but just wondering if that may affect
embedded use?
On Tuesday, 1 January 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.boutemy@free.fr<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> >> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for use
> SLF4J
> >> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if we
> >> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J myself
> so
> >> I'm fine with this approach.
> > is there something visible somewhere?
> > I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists
> nor any
> > code in slf4j git repo
>
> The suggested solution has existed for two years apparently. There is no
> code that needs to be changed and no features to be added.
>
> >
> > resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid method
> > or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private method
> > invocation through reflection
> >
> > how are we supposed to work on this?
> >
>
> Just take a look at:
>
>
> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/test/java/org/slf4j/LoggerFactoryFriend.java
>
> Pretty straight forward. I don't have time to look at it until Friday but
> if want to implement the reset go for it. I'll ping you on Friday to see
> where you are and help out if you need it.
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
> > simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org<javascript:;>
> >
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Jason van Zyl
> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> Founder, Apache Maven
> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
>
> -- Unknown
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Logging
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io>.
On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit :
>> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for use SLF4J
>> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if we
>> want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J myself so
>> I'm fine with this approach.
> is there something visible somewhere?
> I didn't find any discussion on slf4j-dev or slf4j-user mailing lists nor any
> code in slf4j git repo
The suggested solution has existed for two years apparently. There is no code that needs to be changed and no features to be added.
>
> resetting TARGET_STREAM in SimpleLogger [1] would require a publid method
> or I imagine we can even tweak private field access and private method
> invocation through reflection
>
> how are we supposed to work on this?
>
Just take a look at:
https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/logback-classic/src/test/java/org/slf4j/LoggerFactoryFriend.java
Pretty straight forward. I don't have time to look at it until Friday but if want to implement the reset go for it. I'll ping you on Friday to see where you are and help out if you need it.
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/blob/master/slf4j-
> simple/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.java
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder & CTO, Sonatype
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------
We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
-- Unknown