Open source flash player

[Thiago Maia <a0...@a00s.com>]

What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash 
player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex 
developpers.

http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway-lands-firefox-nightly/


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

Re: Open source flash player

[Thiago Maia <a0...@a00s.com>]

I got a big application in flex, all the screens are dynamic builded in 
realtime. My big problem is the mobile/tablets and time. If it works 
directly I could just change some lines to fit in the mobile screen/tablet.

Then you can say, why I dont just use AIR? becouse many customer are 
using linux, and even AIR is very similar to the online application, 
still have to change many things when change from AIR and by Browser.  
Things like send commands to a Matrix Printer, USB cards...

btw, I 100% agree with you about the javascript

On 11/7/2013 1:14 AM, Carlos Velasco wrote:
> I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting
> FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is just
> like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
> White TVs...
>
> Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
> Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
>
>> Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.
>>
>> What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is working
>> on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
>> that do!
>>
>> ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least testing
>> it a bit.
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It seems
>>> more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
>>> side.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
>>>> player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
>>>> developpers.
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
>>>> -lands-firefox-nightly/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
>>>> protection is active.
>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>
>>>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

Re: Open source flash player

[Alain Ekambi <ja...@gmail.com>]

@Adam
We hav had this requirement lots of time and I wrote about it here in the
forum.
We solve this using one single language(good for enterprise scale apps)
without the need of outputing JS from Flex.



2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>

> Carlos,
>
> Let me explain a bit further. The clients have a Flex enterprise app that
> they love already. But they want a customer-facing interface for certain
> small things. So to write something in JavaScript for those parts is a pain
> when a simple output-to-JavaScript from an almost trivial flex app would be
> nice. Heck, having the option to present the user with a JS view if they
> don't have Flash, or the Flash view if they have Flash - would be even
> better!
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Carlos Velasco <
> carlos.velasco.blanco@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Adam, the client you're talking about is the right client for
> Javascript...
> > When talking about flex, the scope changes. Flex is intended for
> > medium-high weight enterprise RIA developments and there is where
> > Javascript is a piece of rubbish (dirty and expensive to maintain).
> >
> > It is not a matter of venting, but of trying to separate both kinds of
> > clients as their needs are different and also belong to different
> markets.
> >
> > Instead, there have been lots of movements trying to raise JS out of its
> > "simple-buggy-dirty applications" development scope, which is what makes
> me
> > feel like WTF!!!
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
> >
> > > Carlos, I'm not sure if your comment was directed at mine, or if you
> were
> > > just venting a bit, but when I said that I don't personally need it, I
> > > meant it.
> > >
> > > What my clients want a lot of the time is a simple site for customers
> to
> > > sign up, or do something fancy like their backend does, yet get it done
> > > quick and dirty. Fussing with consumers or other enterprises who don't
> > > necessarily have Flash even installed (yes, they exist) isn't something
> > we
> > > like to do. So, we often we will just write something in JavaScript
> that
> > > connects to our backend. I would rather have something somewhat
> connected
> > > to the backend app, written in the same language, but as it is, I can't
> > do
> > > that. Having the option to output a simple app / site in JavaScript is
> > > appealing in that regard. Letting a JavaScript/CSS guy mess with and
> > style
> > > up the output; even more appealing.
> > >
> > > -Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Carlos Velasco <
> > > carlos.velasco.blanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of
> > porting
> > > > FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it
> is
> > > just
> > > > like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black
> and
> > > > White TVs...
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
> > > > Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on
> > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is
> > > > working
> > > > > on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of
> > clients
> > > > > that do!
> > > > >
> > > > > ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least
> > > > testing
> > > > > it a bit.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Adam
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.
>  It
> > > > seems
> > > > > > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user
> > > interaction
> > > > > > side.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource
> > flash
> > > > > > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us
> > > flex
> > > > > > >developpers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> > > > > > >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >---
> > > > > > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast!
> > Antivirus
> > > > > > >protection is active.
> > > > > > >http://www.avast.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>]

Carlos,

Let me explain a bit further. The clients have a Flex enterprise app that
they love already. But they want a customer-facing interface for certain
small things. So to write something in JavaScript for those parts is a pain
when a simple output-to-JavaScript from an almost trivial flex app would be
nice. Heck, having the option to present the user with a JS view if they
don't have Flash, or the Flash view if they have Flash - would be even
better!

-Adam


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Carlos Velasco <
carlos.velasco.blanco@gmail.com> wrote:

> Adam, the client you're talking about is the right client for Javascript...
> When talking about flex, the scope changes. Flex is intended for
> medium-high weight enterprise RIA developments and there is where
> Javascript is a piece of rubbish (dirty and expensive to maintain).
>
> It is not a matter of venting, but of trying to separate both kinds of
> clients as their needs are different and also belong to different markets.
>
> Instead, there have been lots of movements trying to raise JS out of its
> "simple-buggy-dirty applications" development scope, which is what makes me
> feel like WTF!!!
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
>
> > Carlos, I'm not sure if your comment was directed at mine, or if you were
> > just venting a bit, but when I said that I don't personally need it, I
> > meant it.
> >
> > What my clients want a lot of the time is a simple site for customers to
> > sign up, or do something fancy like their backend does, yet get it done
> > quick and dirty. Fussing with consumers or other enterprises who don't
> > necessarily have Flash even installed (yes, they exist) isn't something
> we
> > like to do. So, we often we will just write something in JavaScript that
> > connects to our backend. I would rather have something somewhat connected
> > to the backend app, written in the same language, but as it is, I can't
> do
> > that. Having the option to output a simple app / site in JavaScript is
> > appealing in that regard. Letting a JavaScript/CSS guy mess with and
> style
> > up the output; even more appealing.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Carlos Velasco <
> > carlos.velasco.blanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of
> porting
> > > FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is
> > just
> > > like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
> > > White TVs...
> > >
> > > Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
> > > Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
> > >
> > > > Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on
> it.
> > > >
> > > > What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is
> > > working
> > > > on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of
> clients
> > > > that do!
> > > >
> > > > ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least
> > > testing
> > > > it a bit.
> > > >
> > > > -Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It
> > > seems
> > > > > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user
> > interaction
> > > > > side.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource
> flash
> > > > > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us
> > flex
> > > > > >developpers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> > > > > >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >---
> > > > > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast!
> Antivirus
> > > > > >protection is active.
> > > > > >http://www.avast.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Carlos Velasco <ca...@gmail.com>]

Adam, the client you're talking about is the right client for Javascript...
When talking about flex, the scope changes. Flex is intended for
medium-high weight enterprise RIA developments and there is where
Javascript is a piece of rubbish (dirty and expensive to maintain).

It is not a matter of venting, but of trying to separate both kinds of
clients as their needs are different and also belong to different markets.

Instead, there have been lots of movements trying to raise JS out of its
"simple-buggy-dirty applications" development scope, which is what makes me
feel like WTF!!!


2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>

> Carlos, I'm not sure if your comment was directed at mine, or if you were
> just venting a bit, but when I said that I don't personally need it, I
> meant it.
>
> What my clients want a lot of the time is a simple site for customers to
> sign up, or do something fancy like their backend does, yet get it done
> quick and dirty. Fussing with consumers or other enterprises who don't
> necessarily have Flash even installed (yes, they exist) isn't something we
> like to do. So, we often we will just write something in JavaScript that
> connects to our backend. I would rather have something somewhat connected
> to the backend app, written in the same language, but as it is, I can't do
> that. Having the option to output a simple app / site in JavaScript is
> appealing in that regard. Letting a JavaScript/CSS guy mess with and style
> up the output; even more appealing.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Carlos Velasco <
> carlos.velasco.blanco@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting
> > FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is
> just
> > like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
> > White TVs...
> >
> > Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
> > Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
> >
> > > Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.
> > >
> > > What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is
> > working
> > > on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
> > > that do!
> > >
> > > ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least
> > testing
> > > it a bit.
> > >
> > > -Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It
> > seems
> > > > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user
> interaction
> > > > side.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
> > > > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us
> flex
> > > > >developpers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> > > > >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >---
> > > > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> > > > >protection is active.
> > > > >http://www.avast.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>]

Carlos, I'm not sure if your comment was directed at mine, or if you were
just venting a bit, but when I said that I don't personally need it, I
meant it.

What my clients want a lot of the time is a simple site for customers to
sign up, or do something fancy like their backend does, yet get it done
quick and dirty. Fussing with consumers or other enterprises who don't
necessarily have Flash even installed (yes, they exist) isn't something we
like to do. So, we often we will just write something in JavaScript that
connects to our backend. I would rather have something somewhat connected
to the backend app, written in the same language, but as it is, I can't do
that. Having the option to output a simple app / site in JavaScript is
appealing in that regard. Letting a JavaScript/CSS guy mess with and style
up the output; even more appealing.

-Adam


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Carlos Velasco <
carlos.velasco.blanco@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting
> FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is just
> like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
> White TVs...
>
> Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
> Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
>
> > Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.
> >
> > What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is
> working
> > on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
> > that do!
> >
> > ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least
> testing
> > it a bit.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It
> seems
> > > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
> > > side.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
> > > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
> > > >developpers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> > > >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >---
> > > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> > > >protection is active.
> > > >http://www.avast.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Thiago Maia <a0...@a00s.com>]

Many times I was worries that something was going to replace Flash/Flash 
and I have to remake all my application, I always look around the 
internet to see if something is even close. I never found anithing to 
replace Flex on the web, always is something ugly, or slow, or very 
confusing.

For me soon is going to appear more swf players, to replace the adobe 
player, same have many .mp3, AVI... players softwares, maybe even adobe 
some day make it opensource.


On 11/7/2013 10:27 PM, Abid wrote:
> Hello All
> Please tell me What is the future of flex ,
> I m very confuse about this Please help me honestly .
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alain Ekambi [mailto:jazzmatadazz@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 9:32 AM
> To: users@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Open source flash player
>
> @Carlos
> I wondering myself why this JS output is  all about.
> We shall see.
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Carlos Velasco <ca...@gmail.com>
>
>> I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting
>> FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is
> just
>> like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
>> White TVs...
>>
>> Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
>> Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
>>
>>> Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.
>>>
>>> What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is
>> working
>>> on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
>>> that do!
>>>
>>> ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least
>> testing
>>> it a bit.
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It
>> seems
>>>> more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
>>>> side.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
>>>>> player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
>>>>> developpers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
>>>>> -lands-firefox-nightly/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
>>>>> protection is active.
>>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>>
>>>>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

RE: Open source flash player

[Abid <ab...@myworldofexpo.com>]

Hello All 
Please tell me What is the future of flex ,
I m very confuse about this Please help me honestly .

-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Ekambi [mailto:jazzmatadazz@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 9:32 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Open source flash player

@Carlos
I wondering myself why this JS output is  all about.
We shall see.


2013/11/7 Carlos Velasco <ca...@gmail.com>

> I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting
> FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is
just
> like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
> White TVs...
>
> Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
> Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
>
> > Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.
> >
> > What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is
> working
> > on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
> > that do!
> >
> > ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least
> testing
> > it a bit.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It
> seems
> > > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
> > > side.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
> > > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
> > > >developpers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> > > >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >---
> > > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> > > >protection is active.
> > > >http://www.avast.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Alain Ekambi <ja...@gmail.com>]

@Carlos
I wondering myself why this JS output is  all about.
We shall see.


2013/11/7 Carlos Velasco <ca...@gmail.com>

> I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting
> FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is just
> like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
> White TVs...
>
> Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
> Javascript is the future... " staff out there.
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>
>
> > Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.
> >
> > What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is
> working
> > on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
> > that do!
> >
> > ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least
> testing
> > it a bit.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It
> seems
> > > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
> > > side.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
> > > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
> > > >developpers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> > > >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >---
> > > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> > > >protection is active.
> > > >http://www.avast.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Carlos Velasco <ca...@gmail.com>]

I don't really know why people are so entusiast with the idea of porting
FLEX to a "hell shit" (just my opinion) technology as Javascripy it is just
like throwing away HD smart TVs and making a party to welcome Black and
White TVs...

Sorry for the offtopic, but really tired of viewing so many "Ooooohhh
Javascript is the future... " staff out there.


2013/11/7 Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>

> Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.
>
> What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is working
> on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
> that do!
>
> ... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least testing
> it a bit.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It seems
> > more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
> > side.
> >
> >
> > On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
> >
> > >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
> > >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
> > >developpers.
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> > >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> > >protection is active.
> > >http://www.avast.com
> > >
> >
> >
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Adam Malejko <ad...@malejko.com>]

Yeah, Shumway may or may not help; but I'm not holding my breath on it.

What will hopefully help Flex a bunch is the JS output that Alex is working
on. Can't wait! I don't personally need it, but I know a lot of clients
that do!

... and as soon as my boss lays off a bit, I hope to start at least testing
it a bit.

-Adam


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:

> This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It seems
> more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
> side.
>
>
> On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:
>
> >What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
> >player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
> >developpers.
> >
> >
> http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
> >-lands-firefox-nightly/
> >
> >
> >---
> >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> >protection is active.
> >http://www.avast.com
> >
>
>

Re: Open source flash player

[Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>]

This was discussed on dev@.  Shumway may not help Flex at all.  It seems
more oriented to the rendering side of Flash, not the user interaction
side.


On 11/6/13 8:11 PM, "Thiago Maia" <a0...@a00s.com> wrote:

>What I understood seens they are trying to build an opensource flash
>player to replace adobe flash player. That would be great for us flex
>developpers.
>
>http://www.ghacks.net/2013/10/02/mozillas-flash-plugin-replacement-shumway
>-lands-firefox-nightly/
>
>
>---
>This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
>protection is active.
>http://www.avast.com
>