You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> on 2017/02/02 09:41:59 UTC
Re: [Text] Consider making the project "multimodule"
Modules of Text would make sense if we get larger differences of
dependencies; if it is just different functionality, subpackages within a
single module would be better.
On 30 Jan 2017 5:53 pm, "Emmanuel Bourg" <eb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 30/01/2017 à 15:16, Rob Tompkins a écrit :
>
> > I lean towards going with a single module out of simplicity
>
> +1
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Text] Consider making the project "multimodule"
Posted by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>.
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:41:59 +0000, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Modules of Text would make sense if we get larger differences of
> dependencies; if it is just different functionality, subpackages
> within a
> single module would be better.
Indeed, the proposal was with an eye towards differing dependency
requirements:
* formatting/parsing of "Complex" would depend on the module
"commons-numbers-complex"
* formatting/parsing of "Fraction" would depend on the module
"commons-numbers-fraction"
while none of the functionality that exists today in [Text] needs
to pull those dependencies.
Gilles
>
> On 30 Jan 2017 5:53 pm, "Emmanuel Bourg" <eb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Le 30/01/2017 � 15:16, Rob Tompkins a �crit :
>>
>> > I lean towards going with a single module out of simplicity
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Emmanuel Bourg
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org