You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/03 21:48:51 UTC
Final release
We're overdue for a release. OpenWebBeans is currently preparing the 1.1.4 we need. We should start preparing as well.
Currently, the release version we have is "beta-3". I think we're pretty safe for a 1.0 at this point.
Any thoughts?
Regardless of what we call it, it would be nice to maybe see some binaries up for vote by the weekend.
-David
Re: Final release
Posted by Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>.
+1 for a 1.0.0 on the hosting front too
----- Original Message -----
From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@openejb.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: Final release
> +1 for a 1.0.0
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/4/3 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> We're overdue for a release. OpenWebBeans is currently preparing the
>> 1.1.4 we need. We should start preparing as well.
>>
>> Currently, the release version we have is "beta-3". I think we're pretty
>> safe for a 1.0 at this point.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Regardless of what we call it, it would be nice to maybe see some
>> binaries
>> up for vote by the weekend.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1 for a new release. Let me know if I can help with anything on the UI.
Jon
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>wrote:
> Yeap.
> I will try it tonight. Not exactly what I wanted, but I can live with that.
> :O) I will definitively need more time for the new interface, but we can
> have a quick path for the current one.
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no?
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> > Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> >
> > >
> > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much
> > > time
> > > > since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project.
> > > >
> > > > The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the
> ejbs
> > > > running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final
> > > > release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are
> OK
> > > for
> > > > a new release.
> > >
> > > The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some very
> > > stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a final?
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Here is my +1
> > > >
> > > > []s,
> > > > Thiago.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> > jeanouii@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hehe,
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB
> > > 4.0.0
> > > >>
> > > >> Jean-Louis
> > > >>
> > > >> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net> a écrit :
> > > >>
> > > >>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the
> > > >>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best Regards,
> > > >>> Neale
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Yeap.
I will try it tonight. Not exactly what I wanted, but I can live with that.
:O) I will definitively need more time for the new interface, but we can
have a quick path for the current one.
[]s,
Thiago.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no?
>
> - Romain
>
> Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> >
> > On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
> >
> > > Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much
> > time
> > > since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project.
> > >
> > > The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs
> > > running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final
> > > release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are OK
> > for
> > > a new release.
> >
> > The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some very
> > stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a final?
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Here is my +1
> > >
> > > []s,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeanouii@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hehe,
> > >>
> > >> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB
> > 4.0.0
> > >>
> > >> Jean-Louis
> > >>
> > >> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net> a écrit :
> > >>
> > >>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the
> > >>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
> > >>>
> > >>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
> > >>>
> > >>> Best Regards,
> > >>> Neale
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Final release
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Whichever gets done :)
-David
On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no?
>
> - Romain
>
> Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much
>> time
>>> since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project.
>>>
>>> The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs
>>> running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final
>>> release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are OK
>> for
>>> a new release.
>>
>> The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some very
>> stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a final?
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>> []s,
>>> Thiago.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hehe,
>>>>
>>>> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB
>> 4.0.0
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>
>>>> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the
>>>>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
>>>>>
>>>>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Neale
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Final release
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
We can simply skin the old one and release a 1.1.0 quickly, no?
- Romain
Le 4 avr. 2012 04:58, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
>
> > Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much
> time
> > since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project.
> >
> > The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs
> > running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final
> > release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are OK
> for
> > a new release.
>
> The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some very
> stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a final?
>
>
> -David
>
>
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > []s,
> > Thiago.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hehe,
> >>
> >> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB
> 4.0.0
> >>
> >> Jean-Louis
> >>
> >> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net> a écrit :
> >>
> >>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the
> >>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
> >>>
> >>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Neale
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 3, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote:
> Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much time
> since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project.
>
> The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs
> running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final
> release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are OK for
> a new release.
The old interface is pretty bad. Do you have any thoughts on some very stripped down version of the new interface might be good for a final?
-David
>
> Here is my +1
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hehe,
>>
>> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB 4.0.0
>>
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net> a écrit :
>>
>>> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the
>>> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
>>>
>>> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Neale
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Final release
Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
Hmmm... the new web interface is still on its way. I didn't have much time
since my last commit due to some last minute issues in my project.
The new interface has no priority (we really just want to see the ejbs
running :O) ). Also, I don't want this new web interface in a final
release. It should pass by the beta version first. So I think we are OK for
a new release.
Here is my +1
[]s,
Thiago.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hehe,
>
> +1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB 4.0.0
>
> Jean-Louis
>
> Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net> a écrit :
>
> > Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the
> > "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
> >
> > So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Neale
> >
> >
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hehe,
+1 as well for a release and of course for a TomEE 1.0.0 / OpenEJB 4.0.0
Jean-Louis
Le 3 avril 2012 22:16, Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net> a écrit :
> Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the
> "missing WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
>
> So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
>
> Best Regards,
> Neale
>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>.
Very good point. In our tests here, especially since you added the "missing
WEB-INF/web.xml" change, it's ready to go.
So logo or not, +1 on a 1.0.0
Best Regards,
Neale
Re: Final release
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
hmm,
David thinks it will be short for this release, but it can wait after the
binaries, don't worry. Once the binaries are uploaded we can spend time on
it. I think it is very important to get a new version since i released some
people thinks because of the beta we don't have a good quality.
- Romain
2012/4/3 Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>
> PS: Romain - did you decide on the logo?
> The pawprint TomEE one looks great!
> Be good to have a logo finalised for the official launch ;-)
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> To: <de...@openejb.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Final release
>
>
> +1 for a 1.0.0
>>
>> - Romain
>>
>>
>> 2012/4/3 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>
>> We're overdue for a release. OpenWebBeans is currently preparing the
>>> 1.1.4 we need. We should start preparing as well.
>>>
>>> Currently, the release version we have is "beta-3". I think we're pretty
>>> safe for a 1.0 at this point.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Regardless of what we call it, it would be nice to maybe see some
>>> binaries
>>> up for vote by the weekend.
>>>
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>.
PS: Romain - did you decide on the logo?
The pawprint TomEE one looks great!
Be good to have a logo finalised for the official launch ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@openejb.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: Final release
> +1 for a 1.0.0
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/4/3 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> We're overdue for a release. OpenWebBeans is currently preparing the
>> 1.1.4 we need. We should start preparing as well.
>>
>> Currently, the release version we have is "beta-3". I think we're pretty
>> safe for a 1.0 at this point.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Regardless of what we call it, it would be nice to maybe see some
>> binaries
>> up for vote by the weekend.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 for a 1.0.0
- Romain
2012/4/3 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> We're overdue for a release. OpenWebBeans is currently preparing the
> 1.1.4 we need. We should start preparing as well.
>
> Currently, the release version we have is "beta-3". I think we're pretty
> safe for a 1.0 at this point.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regardless of what we call it, it would be nice to maybe see some binaries
> up for vote by the weekend.
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> for the 7.0.27: can't we simply deploy it manually to apache nexus?
We could manually sign all the binaries and manually deploy the binaries and the signatures and md5 files, sure.
We'd still need to vote on them, though.
-David
> 2012/4/5 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> it is already on repo1 and we only have to deploy the zip manually as we
>>> did for 7.0.21.
>>>
>>> i really would like the 7.0.27 since some websocket work is included and
>> is
>>> a great improvement!
>>
>> We were deploying them into svn and listing svn as a repo. Infra asked us
>> to find a better way as keeping binaries in svn is not really optimal.
>>
>> Getting them deployed as part of the Tomcat release process is the ideal
>> approach and something I brought up on dev@tomcat. At this point, having
>> a patch in hand is probably what is need to continue that discussion.
>> Seems this is what we need to update:
>>
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
>>
>>
>> As 7.0.27 is actually already published and completely finished, we
>> probably just need to figure out a workaround for this build. Perhaps a
>> tiny little maven project we can release like a regular release.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>>
>>> 2012/4/5 Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>
>>>
>>>> Compared to 7.0.21, I'd much prefer it on 7.0.26 or 27 if the release
>>>> dates coincide.
>>>>
>>>> Today on Twitter:
>>>> RT @TheApacheTomcat: 7.0.27 release vote passed. Release mechanics in
>>>> progress.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Final release
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
for the 7.0.27: can't we simply deploy it manually to apache nexus?
for next releases: we should push stronger on tomcat mailing list
- Romain
2012/4/5 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> > it is already on repo1 and we only have to deploy the zip manually as we
> > did for 7.0.21.
> >
> > i really would like the 7.0.27 since some websocket work is included and
> is
> > a great improvement!
>
> We were deploying them into svn and listing svn as a repo. Infra asked us
> to find a better way as keeping binaries in svn is not really optimal.
>
> Getting them deployed as part of the Tomcat release process is the ideal
> approach and something I brought up on dev@tomcat. At this point, having
> a patch in hand is probably what is need to continue that discussion.
> Seems this is what we need to update:
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
>
>
> As 7.0.27 is actually already published and completely finished, we
> probably just need to figure out a workaround for this build. Perhaps a
> tiny little maven project we can release like a regular release.
>
>
> -David
>
> >
> > 2012/4/5 Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>
> >
> >> Compared to 7.0.21, I'd much prefer it on 7.0.26 or 27 if the release
> >> dates coincide.
> >>
> >> Today on Twitter:
> >> RT @TheApacheTomcat: 7.0.27 release vote passed. Release mechanics in
> >> progress.
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 5, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> it is already on repo1 and we only have to deploy the zip manually as we
> did for 7.0.21.
>
> i really would like the 7.0.27 since some websocket work is included and is
> a great improvement!
We were deploying them into svn and listing svn as a repo. Infra asked us to find a better way as keeping binaries in svn is not really optimal.
Getting them deployed as part of the Tomcat release process is the ideal approach and something I brought up on dev@tomcat. At this point, having a patch in hand is probably what is need to continue that discussion. Seems this is what we need to update:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
As 7.0.27 is actually already published and completely finished, we probably just need to figure out a workaround for this build. Perhaps a tiny little maven project we can release like a regular release.
-David
>
> 2012/4/5 Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>
>
>> Compared to 7.0.21, I'd much prefer it on 7.0.26 or 27 if the release
>> dates coincide.
>>
>> Today on Twitter:
>> RT @TheApacheTomcat: 7.0.27 release vote passed. Release mechanics in
>> progress.
>>
>>
Re: Final release
Posted by Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>.
7.0.27 is now released with WebSockets (RFC6455)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rm...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@openejb.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: Final release
> it is already on repo1 and we only have to deploy the zip manually as we
> did for 7.0.21.
>
> i really would like the 7.0.27 since some websocket work is included and
> is
> a great improvement!
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/4/5 Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>
>
>> Compared to 7.0.21, I'd much prefer it on 7.0.26 or 27 if the release
>> dates coincide.
>>
>> Today on Twitter:
>> RT @TheApacheTomcat: 7.0.27 release vote passed. Release mechanics in
>> progress.
>>
>>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
it is already on repo1 and we only have to deploy the zip manually as we
did for 7.0.21.
i really would like the 7.0.27 since some websocket work is included and is
a great improvement!
- Romain
2012/4/5 Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>
> Compared to 7.0.21, I'd much prefer it on 7.0.26 or 27 if the release
> dates coincide.
>
> Today on Twitter:
> RT @TheApacheTomcat: 7.0.27 release vote passed. Release mechanics in
> progress.
>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Neale Rudd <ne...@metawerx.net>.
Compared to 7.0.21, I'd much prefer it on 7.0.26 or 27 if the release dates
coincide.
Today on Twitter:
RT @TheApacheTomcat: 7.0.27 release vote passed. Release mechanics in
progress.
Re: Final release
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Here is the patch to get t7.0.27 once it will de deployed on our nexus:
https://gist.github.com/2309687
- Romain
2012/4/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to give it a try with t7.0.27 while we are waiting
> dependencies?
>
> i locally patched tomee and actually look if it passes but we still need
> to deploy org.apache.openejb:apache-tomcat:7.0.27:zip and i don't really
> know how to do it as we did for 7.0.21.
>
> Any objection to give a try? Anybody to deploy t7.0.27?
>
> - Romain
>
>
>
> 2012/4/5 AndyG <an...@orprovision.com>
>
>> +1 on OpenEJB 4.0
>>
>> Cannot really comment on TomEE as I have barely used it.
>>
>>
>> David Blevins-2 wrote
>> >
>> > We're overdue for a release.
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Final-release-tp4529975p4534198.html
>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
Re: Final release
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
is it possible to give it a try with t7.0.27 while we are waiting
dependencies?
i locally patched tomee and actually look if it passes but we still need to
deploy org.apache.openejb:apache-tomcat:7.0.27:zip and i don't really know
how to do it as we did for 7.0.21.
Any objection to give a try? Anybody to deploy t7.0.27?
- Romain
2012/4/5 AndyG <an...@orprovision.com>
> +1 on OpenEJB 4.0
>
> Cannot really comment on TomEE as I have barely used it.
>
>
> David Blevins-2 wrote
> >
> > We're overdue for a release.
> >
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Final-release-tp4529975p4534198.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Final release
Posted by AndyG <an...@orprovision.com>.
+1 on OpenEJB 4.0
Cannot really comment on TomEE as I have barely used it.
David Blevins-2 wrote
>
> We're overdue for a release.
>
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Final-release-tp4529975p4534198.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.