You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> on 2015/12/04 22:36:20 UTC

[PODLINGNAMESEARCH] Tempo - will there be issues using this name?

This is an issue for trademarks actually. For the reason Tony described 
I assume the podling should look for a more suitable name.

Advice appreciated.
Hadrian

On 12/04/2015 03:03 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
> Hi all,  as part of the due diligence for the TempoProposal we need to see if the name ’Tempo’ is viable. I did a search of the US Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) and found 188 live uses of this name as well as a Google Search. The most interesting one that emerged and that is directly related to this technology space was a Chicago based start-up called TempoIQ see https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/tempo#/entity <https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/tempo#/entity>. It would be good to get the Apache Legal team perspective on this. I didn’t do an International search on the name yet but will do so if needed.
>
> Thanks
> -Tony
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [PODLINGNAMESEARCH] Tempo - will there be issues using this name?

Posted by Shane Curcuru <as...@shanecurcuru.org>.
(note mixed public/private lists)

Thanks.  The ASF has slightly different criteria for a name search than
most software vendors, so this bears discussion.

If someone could forward brief details of the proposed podling, what
company is donating it, and any other name search details to the
privately-archived trademarks@apache.org mailing list then we can look
into it.

In particular, if the donating company is willing to do a more thorough
name search with their counsel and send us the results at
trademarks@apache.org, that is immensely helpful to us as a non-profit.

- Shane

Hadrian Zbarcea wrote on 12/4/15 4:36 PM:
> This is an issue for trademarks actually. For the reason Tony described
> I assume the podling should look for a more suitable name.
> 
> Advice appreciated.
> Hadrian
> 
> On 12/04/2015 03:03 PM, Tony Faustini wrote:
>> Hi all,  as part of the due diligence for the TempoProposal we need to
>> see if the name ’Tempo’ is viable. I did a search of the US Trademark
>> Electronic Search System (TESS) and found 188 live uses of this name
>> as well as a Google Search. The most interesting one that emerged and
>> that is directly related to this technology space was a Chicago based
>> start-up called TempoIQ see
>> https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/tempo#/entity
>> <https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/tempo#/entity>. It would be
>> good to get the Apache Legal team perspective on this. I didn’t do an
>> International search on the name yet but will do so if needed.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Tony


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org