You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Daniel Kulp (Resolved) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/01/17 19:22:43 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CXF-4036) JAXBContextInitializer ignores some javax.xml.bind Annotations

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Daniel Kulp resolved CXF-4036.
------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.5.2
                   2.4.6
         Assignee: Daniel Kulp


Major thanks for that analysis and suggestions.
                
> JAXBContextInitializer ignores some javax.xml.bind Annotations
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-4036
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4036
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAXB Databinding
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.3, 2.5.1
>            Reporter: d ferbas
>            Assignee: Daniel Kulp
>             Fix For: 2.4.6, 2.5.2
>
>
> {{org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBContextInitializer}} ignores {{@XmlTransient}} and {{@XmlJavaTypeAdapter}} at some locations. This can lead to fatal exceptions because it tries to analyze (add) classes that are not intended to be xml-marshalled.
> {{@XmlTransient}} is ignored if placed on a setter (when using {{@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.PUBLIC_MEMBER))}}. Jaxb (tested with jdk 1.6.0_18) honors this no matter if placed on getter or setter of the property.
> The problem could be in {{org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBContextInitializer.isMethodAccepted(Method, XmlAccessType)}} where a getter is accepted even if its setter has {{@XmlTransient}}. As a workaround the annotation has to be placed on the getter.
> {{@XmlJavaTypeAdapter}} is ignored if placed on class level (that again is OK for Jaxb). 
> The problem could be in {{org.apache.cxf.jaxb.JAXBContextInitializer.addClass(Class<?>)}} where the @XmlJavaTypeAdapter annotation is checked only if the class is an interface, but not otherwise (especially the superclass is added w.o. checking if there is a typeadapter to use). 
> As a workaround the annotation can be placed on the using field/property of the type. But obviously this leads to duplication if the class with adapter is used more than once.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira