You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> on 2015/05/01 07:28:54 UTC
Re: 1.9.0-beta1 up for testing/signing
On 4/21/15 1:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.9.0-rc1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> This being a rc1 it means that our soak period for 1.9.0 has begun as described
> here:
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization
Still need one more Windows vote. Unlike a beta or alpha we need 3 +1's for
both Windows and *nix.
If there are objections happy to roll a rc2 with whatever fixes needed. I know
we've got several things queued up for a possible rc2.
Re: 1.9.0-beta1 up for testing/signing
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@wandisco.com>.
Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com> writes:
> Note: I calculated the SHA1 checksum of
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
>
> as c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 which *differs* from the published value at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1
I see 2443ccc26fd3280b24d38087c5f4291202787f1d as expected:
$ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip | sha1sum
2443ccc26fd3280b24d38087c5f4291202787f1d -
--
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
RE: 1.9.0-beta1 up for testing/signing
Posted by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptburba@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 7 mei 2015 22:02
> To: Ben Reser
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: 1.9.0-beta1 up for testing/signing
>
> SUMMARY:
> ---------
> +1 to release
>
> VERIFIED:
> ---------
> Other than some unimportant link/content differences[1] in
>
> tools/dist/nominate.pl
> tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnpubsub
> tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnwcsub
>
> and the expected differences in subversion/include/svn_version.h,
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
>
> is identical to
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.9.x@1675149
>
> [1] See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0079.shtml for details.
>
> Note: I calculated the SHA1 checksum of
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
>
> as c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 which *differs* from the published
> value at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1
>
> >fciv --sha subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
> //
> // File Checksum Integrity Verifier version 2.05.
> //
> c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
>
> >svn cat https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-
> rc1.zip.sha1
> 2443ccc26fd3280b24d38087c5f4291202787f1d
>
> As I mentioned above, I copied the zip contents over the top of a
> 1.9.x@1675149 checkout and didn't notice anything unexpected (though
> FWIW the link issue with tools/dist/nominate.pl is new since I last
> tested 1.8), so maybe an error on your end Ben?
The files:
tools/dist/nominate.pl
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnpubsub
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnwcsub
are all symlinks now, so I'm not surprised that they show up as different. (I'm guessing the actual content is in the zip, while your working copy expects the standard subversion placeholder)
Bert
Re: 1.9.0-beta1 up for testing/signing
Posted by Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com>.
SUMMARY:
---------
+1 to release
VERIFIED:
---------
Other than some unimportant link/content differences[1] in
tools/dist/nominate.pl
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnpubsub
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnwcsub
and the expected differences in subversion/include/svn_version.h,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
is identical to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.9.x@1675149
[1] See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0079.shtml for details.
Note: I calculated the SHA1 checksum of
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
as c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 which *differs* from the published value at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1
>fciv --sha subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
//
// File Checksum Integrity Verifier version 2.05.
//
c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
>svn cat https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1
2443ccc26fd3280b24d38087c5f4291202787f1d
As I mentioned above, I copied the zip contents over the top of a
1.9.x@1675149 checkout and didn't notice anything unexpected (though
FWIW the link issue with tools/dist/nominate.pl is new since I last
tested 1.8), so maybe an error on your end Ben?
>gpg2 --verify subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.asc
gpg: WARNING: multiple signatures detected. Only the first will be checked.
gpg: Signature made 04/21/15 15:55:40 Eastern Daylight Time using RSA
key ID 16A0DE01
gpg: Good signature from "Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>"
gpg: aka "Ben Reser <br...@apache.org>"
gpg: aka "Ben Reser <be...@wandisco.com>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 19BB CAEF 7B19 B280 A0E2 175E 62D4 8FAD 16A0 DE01
TESTED:
-------
[Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ ra_file | ra_svn | ra_serf) ]
RESULTS:
--------
All Tests Pass
PLATFORM:
---------
MS Windows 7 Home Premium Service Pack 1
Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2012 Version 11.0.60315.01 Update 2
DEPENDENCIES:
-------------
APR: 1.4.6
APR-UTIL: 1.4.1
zlib: 1.2.7
OpenSSL: 0.9.8q
Apache: 2.2.22
BDB: 4.8.30
sqlite: 3.7.7.1
Python: 2.7.2 (ActivePython 2.7.2.5)
Perl: 5.14.2
Ruby: ruby 1.8.7
java: 1.7.0_10
junit: 4.8.2
swig: 1.3.40
serf: 1.3.8
SIGNATURE:
----------
user: "Paul T. Burba <pburba_at_collab.net>"
4096-bit RSA key, ID 56F3D7BC, created 2012-12-11
For https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)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=sqLd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
>> On 4/21/15 1:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> The 1.9.0-rc1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>>> and add your signatures there.
>>>
>>> This being a rc1 it means that our soak period for 1.9.0 has begun as described
>>> here:
>>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization
>>
>> Still need one more Windows vote. Unlike a beta or alpha we need 3 +1's for
>> both Windows and *nix.
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Running the tests right now, just waiting for the ra_serf variants to
> complete. No failures so far, so I should have sigs incoming by
> tonight barring any unexpected failures.
>
>> If there are objections happy to roll a rc2 with whatever fixes needed. I know
>> we've got several things queued up for a possible rc2.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul T. Burba
> CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development
> Skype: ptburba
--
Paul T. Burba
CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development
Skype: ptburba
Re: 1.9.0-beta1 up for testing/signing
Posted by Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
> On 4/21/15 1:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> The 1.9.0-rc1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>> Please get the tarballs from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>> and add your signatures there.
>>
>> This being a rc1 it means that our soak period for 1.9.0 has begun as described
>> here:
>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization
>
> Still need one more Windows vote. Unlike a beta or alpha we need 3 +1's for
> both Windows and *nix.
Hi Ben,
Running the tests right now, just waiting for the ra_serf variants to
complete. No failures so far, so I should have sigs incoming by
tonight barring any unexpected failures.
> If there are objections happy to roll a rc2 with whatever fixes needed. I know
> we've got several things queued up for a possible rc2.
>
--
Paul T. Burba
CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development
Skype: ptburba