You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com> on 2012/07/26 17:07:48 UTC
[RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1365887 for next developer snapshot
(RC)
Hi,
I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
snapshot.
Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
the voting on this build.
Juergen
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1366353 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Ji Yan <ya...@gmail.com>.
Juergen, thanks for your fix. I can download now
2012/7/30 Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>
> On 7/30/12 9:57 AM, Ji Yan wrote:
> > Same problem as before, Windows package permission is incorrect. Access
> > forbidden.
>
> fixed, sorry I will change my copy scripts now ;-) I thought I would
> have done this already.
>
> Juergen
>
> >
> > 2012/7/30 Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>
> >
> >> On 7/27/12 2:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>> On 7/26/12 5:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next
> developer
> >>>> snapshot.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the
> source
> >>>> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
> >>>> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these
> builds.
> >>>>
> >>>> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
> >>>> the voting on this build.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> We had to cancel the build on r1365887 because of a serious regression
> >>> which is fixed now.
> >>>
> >>> Reset everything and start new builds based on revision r1366353.
> >>> Hopefully the final ones.
> >>>
> >>> @Ariel: sorry for this further round but for me it's the same.
> Hopefully
> >>> we can start the vote on Monday latest, maybe earlier. I will check the
> >>> status over the weekend but will have only limited time.
> >>>
> >>
> >> MacOS and Windows are available
> >>
> >> Juergen
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1366353 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/30/12 9:57 AM, Ji Yan wrote:
> Same problem as before, Windows package permission is incorrect. Access
> forbidden.
fixed, sorry I will change my copy scripts now ;-) I thought I would
have done this already.
Juergen
>
> 2012/7/30 Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>
>
>> On 7/27/12 2:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 7/26/12 5:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
>>>> snapshot.
>>>>
>>>> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
>>>> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
>>>> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
>>>>
>>>> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
>>>> the voting on this build.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We had to cancel the build on r1365887 because of a serious regression
>>> which is fixed now.
>>>
>>> Reset everything and start new builds based on revision r1366353.
>>> Hopefully the final ones.
>>>
>>> @Ariel: sorry for this further round but for me it's the same. Hopefully
>>> we can start the vote on Monday latest, maybe earlier. I will check the
>>> status over the weekend but will have only limited time.
>>>
>>
>> MacOS and Windows are available
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1366353 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Ji Yan <ya...@gmail.com>.
Same problem as before, Windows package permission is incorrect. Access
forbidden.
2012/7/30 Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>
> On 7/27/12 2:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 7/26/12 5:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
> >> snapshot.
> >>
> >> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
> >> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
> >> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
> >>
> >> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
> >> the voting on this build.
> >>
> >
> > We had to cancel the build on r1365887 because of a serious regression
> > which is fixed now.
> >
> > Reset everything and start new builds based on revision r1366353.
> > Hopefully the final ones.
> >
> > @Ariel: sorry for this further round but for me it's the same. Hopefully
> > we can start the vote on Monday latest, maybe earlier. I will check the
> > status over the weekend but will have only limited time.
> >
>
> MacOS and Windows are available
>
> Juergen
>
>
--
Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1366353 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/27/12 2:54 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/26/12 5:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
>> snapshot.
>>
>> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
>> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
>> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
>>
>> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
>> the voting on this build.
>>
>
> We had to cancel the build on r1365887 because of a serious regression
> which is fixed now.
>
> Reset everything and start new builds based on revision r1366353.
> Hopefully the final ones.
>
> @Ariel: sorry for this further round but for me it's the same. Hopefully
> we can start the vote on Monday latest, maybe earlier. I will check the
> status over the weekend but will have only limited time.
>
MacOS and Windows are available
Juergen
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1366353 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/26/12 5:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
> snapshot.
>
> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
>
> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
> the voting on this build.
>
We had to cancel the build on r1365887 because of a serious regression
which is fixed now.
Reset everything and start new builds based on revision r1366353.
Hopefully the final ones.
@Ariel: sorry for this further round but for me it's the same. Hopefully
we can start the vote on Monday latest, maybe earlier. I will check the
status over the weekend but will have only limited time.
Juergen
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1365887 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 07/30/2012 04:48 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
> On 7/30/12 4:01 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 7/30/12 2:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:07:48PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
>>>>> snapshot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
>>>>> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
>>>>> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
>>>>>
>>>>> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
>>>>> the voting on this build.
>>>>
>>>> Linux packages are uploaded. I'll update the cwiki page when I finish my
>>>> breakfast :)
>>>
>>> I did it for you because I had the script in place.
>>>
>>> Can you upload the SDK as well
>>
>> IMHO it is a bad idea to release micro versions of the SDK. We must
>> guarantee that the SDK is compatible at least between micro versions,
>> and only release minor and mayor updates, 3.4, 3.5, 4.0, etc. IRRC
>> that's how it was done in OOo times, but you know better :)
Hm, the archive tells me a different thing for 3.2.0 and 3.2.1:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/stable/3.2.0/
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/stable/3.2.1/
But for 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 it was like you guessed. It seems it wasn't done
consequent.
> It will remain compatible and it is for completeness mainly. I am open
> and flexible, we can also decide to not include the SDK in "micro"
> releases. The size of the SDK is not so huge compared to the office and
> doesn't count too much in the overall size.
>
> Any further opinions?
If it's safe to use the SDK from 3.4 also for 3.4.1 then we don't need
new SDK builds.
Marcus
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1365887 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/30/12 4:01 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 7/30/12 2:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:07:48PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
>>>> snapshot.
>>>>
>>>> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
>>>> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
>>>> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
>>>>
>>>> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
>>>> the voting on this build.
>>>
>>> Linux packages are uploaded. I'll update the cwiki page when I finish my
>>> breakfast :)
>>
>> I did it for you because I had the script in place.
>>
>> Can you upload the SDK as well
>
> IMHO it is a bad idea to release micro versions of the SDK. We must
> guarantee that the SDK is compatible at least between micro versions,
> and only release minor and mayor updates, 3.4, 3.5, 4.0, etc. IRRC
> that's how it was done in OOo times, but you know better :)
>
It will remain compatible and it is for completeness mainly. I am open
and flexible, we can also decide to not include the SDK in "micro"
releases. The size of the SDK is not so huge compared to the office and
doesn't count too much in the overall size.
Any further opinions?
Juergen
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1365887 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:01:33AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 7/30/12 2:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:07:48PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
> > >> snapshot.
> > >>
> > >> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
> > >> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
> > >> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
> > >>
> > >> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
> > >> the voting on this build.
> > >
> > > Linux packages are uploaded. I'll update the cwiki page when I finish my
> > > breakfast :)
> >
> > I did it for you because I had the script in place.
> >
> > Can you upload the SDK as well
Done.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1365887 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/30/12 2:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:07:48PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
> >> snapshot.
> >>
> >> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
> >> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
> >> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
> >>
> >> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
> >> the voting on this build.
> >
> > Linux packages are uploaded. I'll update the cwiki page when I finish my
> > breakfast :)
>
> I did it for you because I had the script in place.
>
> Can you upload the SDK as well
IMHO it is a bad idea to release micro versions of the SDK. We must
guarantee that the SDK is compatible at least between micro versions,
and only release minor and mayor updates, 3.4, 3.5, 4.0, etc. IRRC
that's how it was done in OOo times, but you know better :)
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1365887 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 7/30/12 2:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:07:48PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
>> snapshot.
>>
>> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
>> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
>> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
>>
>> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
>> the voting on this build.
>
> Linux packages are uploaded. I'll update the cwiki page when I finish my
> breakfast :)
I did it for you because I had the script in place.
Can you upload the SDK as well
Juergen
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: propose revision r1365887 for next developer
snapshot (RC)
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:07:48PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose revision r1365887 as base for the next developer
> snapshot.
>
> Well we have already or building currently and I have tested the source
> release and have created and uploaded the MacOS and windows version
> already. QA volunteers can start to take a closer look on these builds.
>
> When Ariel has finished the upload of tghe Linux builds we will start
> the voting on this build.
Linux packages are uploaded. I'll update the cwiki page when I finish my
breakfast :)
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina