You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bluesky-dev@incubator.apache.org by "du.haipeng" <du...@gmail.com> on 2009/03/12 01:36:21 UTC
Time to deal with ffmpeg?
All:
We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of the project.
Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
Thanks
du.haipeng
2009-03-12
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Jin Cao <ca...@gmail.com>.
I think the problem is the potential risk of doing mass changes to our
project because of the incompatibility of interfaces between libvorbis and
our project.
2009/3/13 chenwei_yi2003 <ch...@126.com>
> 在2009-03-13 09:37:35，"HAIPENG DU" <du...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
> >might not cause too many changes to our codes.
>
> To solve what problem with "adapter mode" ? For as long as i know, such
> design
> pattern is used to solve the incompatibilitity of interfaces problem
> appeared
> by wrapping them to be suitable for use.
>
> >2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis.
> After
> >> i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read
> the
> >> documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
> >>
> >> 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> > All:
> >> >
> >> > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
> >> >
> >> > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core
> of the
> >> > project.
> >> >
> >> > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> >> >
> >> > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > du.haipeng
> >> > 2009-03-12
> >> >
> --
>
> Wei Chen @ Bluesky Team Xi'an JiaoTong University
--
Jin,Cao a.k.a caojin85cn@gmailcom
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by chenwei_yi2003 <ch...@126.com>.
在2009-03-13 09:37:35，"HAIPENG DU" <du...@gmail.com> 写道：
>If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
>might not cause too many changes to our codes.
To solve what problem with "adapter mode" ? For as long as i know, such design
pattern is used to solve the incompatibilitity of interfaces problem appeared
by wrapping them to be suitable for use.
>2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
>>
>> maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis. After
>> i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read the
>> documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
>>
>> 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > All:
>> >
>> > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
>> >
>> > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of the
>> > project.
>> >
>> > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
>> >
>> > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > du.haipeng
>> > 2009-03-12
>> >
--
Wei Chen @ Bluesky Team Xi'an JiaoTong University
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by J Aaron Farr <fa...@apache.org>.
On Sun 15 Mar 2009 18:40, Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> check out the libvorbis API references.
>
> 2009/3/15 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> The key point is that find some example C language source code of libvorbis
>> API.
Are you sure you want libvorbis or libtheora? Are we talking about
audio or video?
For theora:
http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/theora/examples/
And the vorbis and theora websites are very useful. You may also want
to take some questions directly to them.
Finally, if you find theora will not work for you, the other
ASF-acceptable alternative to ffmpeg is dirac, written by the BBC:
http://diracvideo.org
--
J Aaron Farr jadetower.com [US] +1 724-964-4515
馮傑仁 cubiclemuses.com [HK] +852 8123-7905
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>.
check out the libvorbis API references.
2009/3/15 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
> The key point is that find some example C language source code of libvorbis
> API.
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:21 PM, chen hecky <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > -_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying
> some
> > libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a
> > lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think!
> >
> > 2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after
> you
> > > stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that
> invoke
> > > libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope
> this
> > > > might not cause too many changes to our codes.
> > > >
> > > > 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with
> > libvorbis.
> > > > After
> > > > > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will
> > read
> > > > the
> > > > > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same
> > interfaces.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > > All:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license
> > conflict.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the
> > core
> > > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > du.haipeng
> > > > > > 2009-03-12
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
> > > >
> > > > 电话：+86-13772014365
> > > >
> > > > QQ:176225285
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
--
Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>.
The key point is that find some example C language source code of libvorbis
API.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:21 PM, chen hecky <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying some
> libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a
> lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think!
>
> 2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you
> > stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that invoke
> > libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
> > > might not cause too many changes to our codes.
> > >
> > > 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with
> libvorbis.
> > > After
> > > > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will
> read
> > > the
> > > > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same
> interfaces.
> > > >
> > > > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > All:
> > > > >
> > > > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license
> conflict.
> > > > >
> > > > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the
> core
> > of
> > > the
> > > > > project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > du.haipeng
> > > > > 2009-03-12
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
> > >
> > > 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
> > >
> > > 电话：+86-13772014365
> > >
> > > QQ:176225285
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
--
Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Bill Stoddard <wg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Thanks for discussing this on the list. You're on the right track.
>> It may seem pointless to some extend, because nobody else than you is
>> participating in the discussion. But be assured that this all is read
>> by many subscribers and those who will read this later from the
>> archives.
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>
> Bernd,
> Exactly right. I am following this discussion.
>
+1
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by J Aaron Farr <fa...@apache.org>.
On Sun 15 Mar 2009 08:59, Bill Stoddard <wg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Thanks for discussing this on the list. You're on the right track.
>> It may seem pointless to some extend, because nobody else than you is
>> participating in the discussion. But be assured that this all is read
>> by many subscribers and those who will read this later from the
>> archives.
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>
> Bernd,
> Exactly right. I am following this discussion.
+1
--
J Aaron Farr jadetower.com [US] +1 724-964-4515
馮傑仁 cubiclemuses.com [HK] +852 8123-7905
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Bill Stoddard <wg...@gmail.com>.
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Thanks for discussing this on the list. You're on the right track.
> It may seem pointless to some extend, because nobody else than you is
> participating in the discussion. But be assured that this all is read
> by many subscribers and those who will read this later from the
> archives.
>
> Bernd
>
Bernd,
Exactly right. I am following this discussion.
Thanks,
Bill
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:30, Jin Cao <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kevin!
>>
>> 2009/3/13 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>> audio part：
>>> http://vorbis.com/
>>> http://xiph.org/vorbis/
>>> video part：
>>> use theora
>>> http://www.theora.org/doc/libtheora-1.0/
>>> http://www.theora.org/
>>>
>>> 2009/3/13 chen hecky <he...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying
>>>>
>>> some
>>>
>>>> libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a
>>>> lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think!
>>>>
>>>> 2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you
>>>>> stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that
>>>>>
>>> invoke
>>>
>>>>> libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope
>>>>>>
>>> this
>>>
>>>>>> might not cause too many changes to our codes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with
>>>>>>>
>>>> libvorbis.
>>>>
>>>>>> After
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will
>>>>>>>
>>>> read
>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> documents of both library. God bless us they have the same
>>>>>>>
>>>> interfaces.
>>>>
>>>>>>> 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license
>>>>>>>>
>>>> conflict.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the
>>>>>>>>
>>>> core
>>>>
>>>>> of
>>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> du.haipeng
>>>>>>>> 2009-03-12
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 电话：+86-13772014365
>>>>>>
>>>>>> QQ:176225285
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jin,Cao a.k.a caojin85cn@gmailcom
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Bernd Fondermann <be...@googlemail.com>.
Hey guys,
Thanks for discussing this on the list. You're on the right track.
It may seem pointless to some extend, because nobody else than you is
participating in the discussion. But be assured that this all is read
by many subscribers and those who will read this later from the
archives.
Bernd
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:30, Jin Cao <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Kevin!
>
> 2009/3/13 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
>
>> audio part：
>> http://vorbis.com/
>> http://xiph.org/vorbis/
>> video part：
>> use theora
>> http://www.theora.org/doc/libtheora-1.0/
>> http://www.theora.org/
>>
>> 2009/3/13 chen hecky <he...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > -_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying
>> some
>> > libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a
>> > lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think!
>> >
>> > 2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you
>> > > stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that
>> invoke
>> > > libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope
>> this
>> > > > might not cause too many changes to our codes.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with
>> > libvorbis.
>> > > > After
>> > > > > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will
>> > read
>> > > > the
>> > > > > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same
>> > interfaces.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > All:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license
>> > conflict.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the
>> > core
>> > > of
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > project.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > du.haipeng
>> > > > > > 2009-03-12
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
>> > > >
>> > > > 电话：+86-13772014365
>> > > >
>> > > > QQ:176225285
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jin,Cao a.k.a caojin85cn@gmailcom
>
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Jin Cao <ca...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Kevin!
2009/3/13 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> audio part：
> http://vorbis.com/
> http://xiph.org/vorbis/
> video part：
> use theora
> http://www.theora.org/doc/libtheora-1.0/
> http://www.theora.org/
>
> 2009/3/13 chen hecky <he...@gmail.com>
>
> > -_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying
> some
> > libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a
> > lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think!
> >
> > 2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you
> > > stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that
> invoke
> > > libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope
> this
> > > > might not cause too many changes to our codes.
> > > >
> > > > 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with
> > libvorbis.
> > > > After
> > > > > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will
> > read
> > > > the
> > > > > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same
> > interfaces.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > > All:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license
> > conflict.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the
> > core
> > > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > du.haipeng
> > > > > > 2009-03-12
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
> > > >
> > > > 电话：+86-13772014365
> > > >
> > > > QQ:176225285
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
--
Jin,Cao a.k.a caojin85cn@gmailcom
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>.
audio part：
http://vorbis.com/
http://xiph.org/vorbis/
video part：
use theora
http://www.theora.org/doc/libtheora-1.0/
http://www.theora.org/
2009/3/13 chen hecky <he...@gmail.com>
> -_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying some
> libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a
> lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think!
>
> 2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you
> > stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that invoke
> > libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
> > > might not cause too many changes to our codes.
> > >
> > > 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with
> libvorbis.
> > > After
> > > > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will
> read
> > > the
> > > > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same
> interfaces.
> > > >
> > > > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > All:
> > > > >
> > > > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license
> conflict.
> > > > >
> > > > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the
> core
> > of
> > > the
> > > > > project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > du.haipeng
> > > > > 2009-03-12
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
> > >
> > > 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
> > >
> > > 电话：+86-13772014365
> > >
> > > QQ:176225285
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
--
Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by chen hecky <he...@gmail.com>.
-_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying some
libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a
lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think!
2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
> Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you
> stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that invoke
> libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
> > might not cause too many changes to our codes.
> >
> > 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis.
> > After
> > > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read
> > the
> > > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
> > >
> > > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > All:
> > > >
> > > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
> > > >
> > > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core
> of
> > the
> > > > project.
> > > >
> > > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > > >
> > > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > du.haipeng
> > > > 2009-03-12
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
> >
> > 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
> >
> > 电话：+86-13772014365
> >
> > QQ:176225285
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
--
Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>.
Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you
stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that invoke
libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
> might not cause too many changes to our codes.
>
> 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> >
> > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis.
> After
> > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read
> the
> > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
> >
> > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > All:
> > >
> > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
> > >
> > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of
> the
> > > project.
> > >
> > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > >
> > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > du.haipeng
> > > 2009-03-12
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
>
>
> --
> 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
>
> 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
>
> 电话：+86-13772014365
>
> QQ:176225285
>
--
Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>.
2009/3/13 Jin Cao <ca...@gmail.com>:
> Adapter mode is good.Some of us will be familiar with the API of libvorbis
Chen Chen is the one.
> and FFmpeg.Then we can do something to use libvorbis without too many
> changes to our project.
>
> 2009/3/13 HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
>
>> If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
>> might not cause too many changes to our codes.
>>
>> 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis.
>> After
>> > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read
>> the
>> > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
>> >
>> > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > All:
>> > >
>> > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
>> > >
>> > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of
>> the
>> > > project.
>> > >
>> > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
>> > >
>> > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > du.haipeng
>> > > 2009-03-12
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
>>
>> 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
>>
>> 电话：+86-13772014365
>>
>> QQ:176225285
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jin,Cao a.k.a caojin85cn@gmailcom
>
--
杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
电话：+86-13772014365
QQ:176225285
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Jin Cao <ca...@gmail.com>.
Adapter mode is good.Some of us will be familiar with the API of libvorbis
and FFmpeg.Then we can do something to use libvorbis without too many
changes to our project.
2009/3/13 HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>
> If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
> might not cause too many changes to our codes.
>
> 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> >
> > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis.
> After
> > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read
> the
> > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
> >
> > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > All:
> > >
> > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
> > >
> > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of
> the
> > > project.
> > >
> > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > >
> > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > du.haipeng
> > > 2009-03-12
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
>
>
> --
> 杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
>
> 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
>
> 电话：+86-13772014365
>
> QQ:176225285
>
--
Jin,Cao a.k.a caojin85cn@gmailcom
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by HAIPENG DU <du...@gmail.com>.
If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope this
might not cause too many changes to our codes.
2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
>
> maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis. After
> i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read the
> documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
>
> 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
>
> > All:
> >
> > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
> >
> > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of the
> > project.
> >
> > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> >
> > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > du.haipeng
> > 2009-03-12
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
--
杜海鹏 du.haipeng@gmail.com
西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室
电话：+86-13772014365
QQ:176225285
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by chen hecky <he...@gmail.com>.
Yes! We should put forward a lib which accores with ASL to replace of
FFmpeg! So I think we will face with this problem after the code submitted
to Apache.
2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>
> We should give reference documents about libvorbis to Chen Chen who are
> familiar with FFmpeg and have had programming experience of encoding and
> decoding video/audio. Chen can study fuctions and program API of libvorbis
> now and write some code with the API. Do you think so, Chen? But the
> problem whether or not libvorbis libraries accord with ASL should be
> clarified.
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis.
> > After
> > i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read
> the
> > documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
> >
> > 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > All:
> > >
> > > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
> > >
> > > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of
> > the
> > > project.
> > >
> > > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> > >
> > > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > du.haipeng
> > > 2009-03-12
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
--
Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Shan Jiang <da...@gmail.com>.
We should give reference documents about libvorbis to Chen Chen who are
familiar with FFmpeg and have had programming experience of encoding and
decoding video/audio. Chen can study fuctions and program API of libvorbis
now and write some code with the API. Do you think so, Chen? But the
problem whether or not libvorbis libraries accord with ASL should be
clarified.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis.
> After
> i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read the
> documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
>
> 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
>
> > All:
> >
> > We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
> >
> > The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of
> the
> > project.
> >
> > Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
> >
> > I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > du.haipeng
> > 2009-03-12
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
>
--
Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
Re: Time to deal with ffmpeg?
Posted by Samul Kevin <lo...@gmail.com>.
maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with libvorbis. After
i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will read the
documents of both library. God bless us they have the same interfaces.
2009/3/12 du.haipeng <du...@gmail.com>
> All:
>
> We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license conflict.
>
> The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the core of the
> project.
>
> Some solution has been proposed in the maillist.
>
> I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> du.haipeng
> 2009-03-12
>
--
Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU