You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Jesse Kuhnert (JIRA)" <de...@tapestry.apache.org> on 2007/11/16 16:19:43 UTC

[jira] Created: (TAPESTRY-1916) updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop

updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop
-------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: TAPESTRY-1916
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1916
             Project: Tapestry
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Framework
    Affects Versions: 4.1.3
         Environment: any
            Reporter: Jesse Kuhnert
             Fix For: 4.1.4


>From the mailing list:


I spent three hours on this silly thing so I hope this post will help you
avoid that!

I was testing this out with two iterations of the loop, and that's what
caused me grief. As soon as I switched to four iterations, I figured out
what was happening:

I have a SimplePage.html which includes this:

< span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
index="ognl:objectIndex" >
  < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
  < p>
     < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
        < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
     < /span>
  < /p>
  < /span>
< /span>


I look at the generated page source and the clientId's within the
@DirectLink links don't look right:

< span id="For">
< a id="DirectLink"
href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Sfirst&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink', false)">Show
the word
< p>
  < span id="componentWrapper">
Word:
  < /span>
< /p>
< /span>
< a id="DirectLink_0"
href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Ssecond&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink_0', false)">Show
the word
< p>
  < span id="componentWrapper_0">
Word:
  < /span>
< /p>

Look at the second link... it still shows 'updateParts=componentWrapper'
when it should be 'updateParts=componentWrapper_0'.

The solution to this is trivial (once you know what's going on!). Simply
move the directlink code below the component in question, so we have:

< span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
index="ognl:objectIndex" >
  < p>
     < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
        < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
     < /span>
  < /p>
  < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
  < /span>
< /span>

Now the links will be correct. The reason this happens is that the
@DirectLink component will ask for the componentWrapper clientId on the
first round, and it will default to the componentId because the clientId has
not been set yet because componentWrapper has not been rendered. The second
time around, the @DirectLink will still have the wrong value because it
renders before the componentWrapper.

I hope all that was clear.... if not, please ask questions and I'll be happy
to re-write and re-word it.

Jim

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org


[jira] Updated: (TAPESTRY-1916) updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop

Posted by "Marcus Schulte (JIRA)" <de...@tapestry.apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Marcus Schulte updated TAPESTRY-1916:
-------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 4.1.6)
                   4.1.7

> updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAPESTRY-1916
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1916
>             Project: Tapestry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Framework
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.3
>         Environment: any
>            Reporter: Jesse Kuhnert
>             Fix For: 4.1.7
>
>
> From the mailing list:
> I spent three hours on this silly thing so I hope this post will help you
> avoid that!
> I was testing this out with two iterations of the loop, and that's what
> caused me grief. As soon as I switched to four iterations, I figured out
> what was happening:
> I have a SimplePage.html which includes this:
> < span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
> index="ognl:objectIndex" >
>   < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
> listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
>   < p>
>      < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
>         < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
>      < /span>
>   < /p>
>   < /span>
> < /span>
> I look at the generated page source and the clientId's within the
> @DirectLink links don't look right:
> < span id="For">
> < a id="DirectLink"
> href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Sfirst&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
> onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink', false)">Show
> the word
> < p>
>   < span id="componentWrapper">
> Word:
>   < /span>
> < /p>
> < /span>
> < a id="DirectLink_0"
> href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Ssecond&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
> onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink_0', false)">Show
> the word
> < p>
>   < span id="componentWrapper_0">
> Word:
>   < /span>
> < /p>
> Look at the second link... it still shows 'updateParts=componentWrapper'
> when it should be 'updateParts=componentWrapper_0'.
> The solution to this is trivial (once you know what's going on!). Simply
> move the directlink code below the component in question, so we have:
> < span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
> index="ognl:objectIndex" >
>   < p>
>      < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
>         < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
>      < /span>
>   < /p>
>   < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
> listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
>   < /span>
> < /span>
> Now the links will be correct. The reason this happens is that the
> @DirectLink component will ask for the componentWrapper clientId on the
> first round, and it will default to the componentId because the clientId has
> not been set yet because componentWrapper has not been rendered. The second
> time around, the @DirectLink will still have the wrong value because it
> renders before the componentWrapper.
> I hope all that was clear.... if not, please ask questions and I'll be happy
> to re-write and re-word it.
> Jim

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org


[jira] Updated: (TAPESTRY-1916) updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop

Posted by "Jesse Kuhnert (JIRA)" <de...@tapestry.apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jesse Kuhnert updated TAPESTRY-1916:
------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 4.1.5)
                   4.1.6

> updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAPESTRY-1916
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1916
>             Project: Tapestry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Framework
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.3
>         Environment: any
>            Reporter: Jesse Kuhnert
>             Fix For: 4.1.6
>
>
> From the mailing list:
> I spent three hours on this silly thing so I hope this post will help you
> avoid that!
> I was testing this out with two iterations of the loop, and that's what
> caused me grief. As soon as I switched to four iterations, I figured out
> what was happening:
> I have a SimplePage.html which includes this:
> < span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
> index="ognl:objectIndex" >
>   < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
> listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
>   < p>
>      < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
>         < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
>      < /span>
>   < /p>
>   < /span>
> < /span>
> I look at the generated page source and the clientId's within the
> @DirectLink links don't look right:
> < span id="For">
> < a id="DirectLink"
> href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Sfirst&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
> onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink', false)">Show
> the word
> < p>
>   < span id="componentWrapper">
> Word:
>   < /span>
> < /p>
> < /span>
> < a id="DirectLink_0"
> href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Ssecond&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
> onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink_0', false)">Show
> the word
> < p>
>   < span id="componentWrapper_0">
> Word:
>   < /span>
> < /p>
> Look at the second link... it still shows 'updateParts=componentWrapper'
> when it should be 'updateParts=componentWrapper_0'.
> The solution to this is trivial (once you know what's going on!). Simply
> move the directlink code below the component in question, so we have:
> < span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
> index="ognl:objectIndex" >
>   < p>
>      < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
>         < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
>      < /span>
>   < /p>
>   < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
> listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
>   < /span>
> < /span>
> Now the links will be correct. The reason this happens is that the
> @DirectLink component will ask for the componentWrapper clientId on the
> first round, and it will default to the componentId because the clientId has
> not been set yet because componentWrapper has not been rendered. The second
> time around, the @DirectLink will still have the wrong value because it
> renders before the componentWrapper.
> I hope all that was clear.... if not, please ask questions and I'll be happy
> to re-write and re-word it.
> Jim

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org


[jira] Commented: (TAPESTRY-1916) updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop

Posted by "Andreas Andreou (JIRA)" <de...@tapestry.apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543120 ] 

Andreas Andreou commented on TAPESTRY-1916:
-------------------------------------------

This could happen in any component that contains such pairs (direct link + update part)
and not just to the direct contents of a @For.

And AFAICT, it has to do with the order in the template - if the component to update is before,
leave as is, otherwise, do peekClientId()... Is it possible to get the correct order of the 
components?




> updateComponents doesn't peek for client id in For loop
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAPESTRY-1916
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1916
>             Project: Tapestry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Framework
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.3
>         Environment: any
>            Reporter: Jesse Kuhnert
>             Fix For: 4.1.4
>
>
> From the mailing list:
> I spent three hours on this silly thing so I hope this post will help you
> avoid that!
> I was testing this out with two iterations of the loop, and that's what
> caused me grief. As soon as I switched to four iterations, I figured out
> what was happening:
> I have a SimplePage.html which includes this:
> < span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
> index="ognl:objectIndex" >
>   < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
> listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
>   < p>
>      < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
>         < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
>      < /span>
>   < /p>
>   < /span>
> < /span>
> I look at the generated page source and the clientId's within the
> @DirectLink links don't look right:
> < span id="For">
> < a id="DirectLink"
> href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Sfirst&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
> onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink', false)">Show
> the word
> < p>
>   < span id="componentWrapper">
> Word:
>   < /span>
> < /p>
> < /span>
> < a id="DirectLink_0"
> href="/playing/SimplePage,$DirectLink.direct?sp=Ssecond&amp;updateParts=componentWrapper"
> onclick="return tapestry.linkOnClick(this.href,'DirectLink_0', false)">Show
> the word
> < p>
>   < span id="componentWrapper_0">
> Word:
>   < /span>
> < /p>
> Look at the second link... it still shows 'updateParts=componentWrapper'
> when it should be 'updateParts=componentWrapper_0'.
> The solution to this is trivial (once you know what's going on!). Simply
> move the directlink code below the component in question, so we have:
> < span jwcid="@For" source="ognl:wordList" value="ognl:word"
> index="ognl:objectIndex" >
>   < p>
>      < span jwcid="componentWrapper@Any">
>         < div jwcid="showWordComponent"/>
>      < /span>
>   < /p>
>   < a href="#" jwcid="@DirectLink" updateComponents="componentWrapper"
> listener="listener:showTheWord" parameters="ognl:word">Show the word
>   < /span>
> < /span>
> Now the links will be correct. The reason this happens is that the
> @DirectLink component will ask for the componentWrapper clientId on the
> first round, and it will default to the componentId because the clientId has
> not been set yet because componentWrapper has not been rendered. The second
> time around, the @DirectLink will still have the wrong value because it
> renders before the componentWrapper.
> I hope all that was clear.... if not, please ask questions and I'll be happy
> to re-write and re-word it.
> Jim

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org