You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> on 2009/02/24 20:30:15 UTC
[NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch. I
do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other minor
changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a release
candidate sometime next week.
Thanks,
Joe
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by Jack Cai <gr...@gmail.com>.
Since Donald has marked this JIRA [1] as a blocker, I'm keen to get it fixed
in 2.1.4. I have two ideas which I described in the JIRA comments. Can
anyone who are familiar with the xbean-naming code take a look? Thanks!
-Jack
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4549
2009/3/4 Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>
> We discovered a problem in Axis2 1.3 that prevents web services with
> overloaded methods to be deployed correctly. I would like to include a
> fix for this problem in 2.1.4 and in order to do that I will need to
> create patched versions of some of the Axis2 artifacts. I hope that's
> ok with everybody. I should be able to get this done today if there
> are no objections.
>
> Btw, this problem was already fixed in the latest Axis2 code so it
> does not affect trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
> nearly
> > time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
> >
> > So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
> >
> > Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
> > destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch. I do
> > anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other minor
> changes.
> > Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a release candidate
> sometime
> > next week.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
> >
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
We discovered a problem in Axis2 1.3 that prevents web services with
overloaded methods to be deployed correctly. I would like to include a
fix for this problem in 2.1.4 and in order to do that I will need to
create patched versions of some of the Axis2 artifacts. I hope that's
ok with everybody. I should be able to get this done today if there
are no objections.
Btw, this problem was already fixed in the latest Axis2 code so it
does not affect trunk.
Thanks,
Jarek
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's nearly
> time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>
> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>
> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
> destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch. I do
> anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other minor changes.
> Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a release candidate sometime
> next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4 - 24 hrs
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Hi fp,
We're a bit behind schedule at the moment because we have dependencies
on some other projects (OpenJPA 1.2.1. and OpenEJB 3.0.1) that have been
delayed. Both of those projects are currently up for vote and will
hopefully release within the next day or two. Assuming all goes well we
should have a Geronimo 2.1.4 release candidate up for vote late this
week or early next week. I'll update our status in the wiki.
Regards,
Joe
fp wrote:
> When will Geronimo 2.1.4 Release
> Any Plans/Status?
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.4+Release+Status
> says
> Proposed Branch/freeze date: 02/26/2009
> Proposed Release Candidate: 03/06/2009
> Proposed Release date: 03/12/2009
>
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4 - 24 hrs
Posted by fp <Fr...@impaqgroup.com>.
When will Geronimo 2.1.4 Release
Any Plans/Status?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.4+Release+Status
says
Proposed Branch/freeze date: 02/26/2009
Proposed Release Candidate: 03/06/2009
Proposed Release date: 03/12/2009
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-NOTICE--Creating-server-branches-2.1.4-tp22188813s134p22539419.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4 - 24 hrs
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
I think we've waited long enough for a 2.1.4 branch. Consider this the
24 hour branch notice. I plan to create a branch tomorrow afternoon.
Where things stand regarding dependencies:
- OpenJPA 1.2.1 had the vote rescinded ... but will hopefully be up for
vote again soon (today?).
- OpenEJB 3.0.1 - will hopefully have a vote started soon. There are
some issue with processing the release but will hopefully have an image
up for vote soon (today?)
- tranql connector for Oracle RAC - looks like this is released and we
just need to pull it into G.
- tranql connector for DB2 driver - we need to pull this into G as well.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
> I decided to wait a little longer before creating a 2.1.4 branch.
>
> It will probably be mid next week before all of our dependencies are
> released and we can begin the work for creating a release candidate.
> Therefore, I'm going to wait until early-mid next week to create the
> 2.1.4 branch. That will save us propagating any fixes in the interim.
>
> Please continue to use caution when checking into branches/2.1 for now.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
>> nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>>
>> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>>
>> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
>> destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch. I
>> do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other minor
>> changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a release
>> candidate sometime next week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
I believe that all OpenJPA issues we care about have been resolved (we
have asked them to cut a release). However, I assumed that OpenEJB had
a dependency on OpenJPA being released before it could release. I
think it makes sense to release OpenEJB as soon as possible.
Joe
David Blevins wrote:
> Do you want the OpenEJB 3.0.1 release now or would you prefer to wait
> for the OpenJPA issue to be fixed?
>
> -David
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> I decided to wait a little longer before creating a 2.1.4 branch.
>>
>> It will probably be mid next week before all of our dependencies are
>> released and we can begin the work for creating a release candidate.
>> Therefore, I'm going to wait until early-mid next week to create the
>> 2.1.4 branch. That will save us propagating any fixes in the interim.
>>
>> Please continue to use caution when checking into branches/2.1 for now.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
>>> nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>>> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>>> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
>>> destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch.
>>> I do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other
>>> minor changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a
>>> release candidate sometime next week.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joe
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Do you want the OpenEJB 3.0.1 release now or would you prefer to wait
for the OpenJPA issue to be fixed?
-David
On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> I decided to wait a little longer before creating a 2.1.4 branch.
>
> It will probably be mid next week before all of our dependencies are
> released and we can begin the work for creating a release candidate.
> Therefore, I'm going to wait until early-mid next week to create the
> 2.1.4 branch. That will save us propagating any fixes in the interim.
>
> Please continue to use caution when checking into branches/2.1 for
> now.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
>> nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that
>> might destabilize things and consider holding off until after the
>> branch. I do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes
>> and other minor changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to
>> create a release candidate sometime next week.
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
I decided to wait a little longer before creating a 2.1.4 branch.
It will probably be mid next week before all of our dependencies are
released and we can begin the work for creating a release candidate.
Therefore, I'm going to wait until early-mid next week to create the
2.1.4 branch. That will save us propagating any fixes in the interim.
Please continue to use caution when checking into branches/2.1 for now.
Thanks,
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
> nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>
> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>
> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
> destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch. I
> do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other minor
> changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a release
> candidate sometime next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up David. No, I didn't start the branch yet. I
> got tied up in some other things. Perhaps tomorrow. Even still, we
> can still put fixes in for a few days while we wait for out
> dependencies to get released.
:D
Matt has pushed out a new TranQL driver for DB2 that I'd like to get
in. It's currently a SNAPSHOT. Once I've confirmed it's working, can
have Matt release it.
--kevan
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I committed a minimal fix to branches/2.1 and can't find any problems
in the build or tck. Keep your eyes open and fingers crossed :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 26, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up David. No, I didn't start the branch yet. I
> got tied up in some other things. Perhaps tomorrow. Even still, we
> can still put fixes in for a few days while we wait for out
> dependencies to get released.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>> I just discovered a problem (GERONIMO-4554) that ideally I'd like
>> to fix in 2.1.4. I'm hoping to fix it tonight....
>> AFAICT you haven't actually branched yet so hopefully this will not
>> disrupt things appreciably.
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>> On Feb 24, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think
>>> it's nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>>>
>>> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>>>
>>> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that
>>> might destabilize things and consider holding off until after the
>>> branch. I do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes
>>> and other minor changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to
>>> create a release candidate sometime next week.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joe
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Thanks for the heads up David. No, I didn't start the branch yet. I got
tied up in some other things. Perhaps tomorrow. Even still, we can
still put fixes in for a few days while we wait for out dependencies to
get released.
Thanks,
Joe
David Jencks wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I just discovered a problem (GERONIMO-4554) that ideally I'd like to fix
> in 2.1.4. I'm hoping to fix it tonight....
>
> AFAICT you haven't actually branched yet so hopefully this will not
> disrupt things appreciably.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
>> nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>>
>> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>>
>> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
>> destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch. I
>> do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other minor
>> changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a release
>> candidate sometime next week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joe
>
>
Re: [NOTICE] Creating server/branches/2.1.4
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Joe,
I just discovered a problem (GERONIMO-4554) that ideally I'd like to
fix in 2.1.4. I'm hoping to fix it tonight....
AFAICT you haven't actually branched yet so hopefully this will not
disrupt things appreciably.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 24, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> We're getting very close to a Geronimo 2.1.4 release. I think it's
> nearly time to create a branch to prepare for the release.
>
> So, I'm planning to create a branch on Thursday afternoon (2/26).
>
> Please carefully consider any changes in the branches/2.1 that might
> destabilize things and consider holding off until after the branch.
> I do anticipate that there will continue to be bug fixes and other
> minor changes. Hopefully, we will be in a position to create a
> release candidate sometime next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe