You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Maxim Muzafarov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/10/08 13:06:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-896) Configuration inconsistency

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Maxim Muzafarov updated IGNITE-896:
-----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.8)
                   2.9

> Configuration inconsistency
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-896
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: sprint-5
>            Reporter: Valentin Kulichenko
>            Assignee: Nikolai Kulagin
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: Usability
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> I noticed that some entities on cache configuration are configured via factories, while others are set directly. For example, we use factory for ExpiryPolicy, but not for EvictionPolicy, which looks inconsistent. Since factory-based approach comes from JCache, I think we should use it wherever possible.
> Here is the list of settings that need to be fixed:
> * Affinity
> * AffinityMapper
> * EvictionFilter
> * EvictionPolicy
> * CacheInterceptor
> * TopologyValidator
> Need to add new configuration properties that use factories and deprecate old ones (do not remove for compatibility).
> Also need to check other configuration beans (list above is for cache config only).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)