[jira] [Comment Edited] (KAFKA-6649) ReplicaFetcher stopped after non fatal exception is thrown

["Srinivas Dhruvakumar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16416382#comment-16416382 ] 

Srinivas Dhruvakumar edited comment on KAFKA-6649 at 3/28/18 2:31 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am trying out the patch "high watermark could be incorrectly set to -1" KAFKA-3978. But I am unable to reproduce the above scenario "

: org.apache.kafka.common.errors.OffsetOutOfRangeException: Cannot increment the log start offset to 2098535 of partition [[TOPIC_NAME_REMOVED]]-84 since it is larger than the high watermark -1

"

Does anyone know how to reproduce the above error ? 


was (Author: srinivas.d.12@gmail.com):
I am trying out the patch "high watermark could be incorrectly set to -1". But I am unable to reproduce the above scenario "

: org.apache.kafka.common.errors.OffsetOutOfRangeException: Cannot increment the log start offset to 2098535 of partition [[TOPIC_NAME_REMOVED]]-84 since it is larger than the high watermark -1

"

Does anyone know how to reproduce the above error ? 

> ReplicaFetcher stopped after non fatal exception is thrown
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-6649
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6649
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: replication
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.11.0.2, 1.1.0, 1.0.1
>            Reporter: Julio Ng
>            Priority: Major
>
> We have seen several under-replication partitions, usually triggered by topic creation. After digging in the logs, we see the below:
> {noformat}
> [2018-03-12 22:40:17,641] ERROR [ReplicaFetcher replicaId=12, leaderId=0, fetcherId=1] Error due to (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherThread)
> kafka.common.KafkaException: Error processing data for partition [[TOPIC_NAME_REMOVED]]-84 offset 2098535
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:204)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:169)
>  at scala.Option.foreach(Option.scala:257)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:169)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:166)
>  at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
>  at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2.apply$mcV$sp(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:166)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:166)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:166)
>  at kafka.utils.CoreUtils$.inLock(CoreUtils.scala:250)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.processFetchRequest(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:164)
>  at kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.doWork(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:111)
>  at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:82)
> Caused by: org.apache.kafka.common.errors.OffsetOutOfRangeException: Cannot increment the log start offset to 2098535 of partition [[TOPIC_NAME_REMOVED]]-84 since it is larger than the high watermark -1
> [2018-03-12 22:40:17,641] INFO [ReplicaFetcher replicaId=12, leaderId=0, fetcherId=1] Stopped (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherThread){noformat}
> It looks like that after the ReplicaFetcherThread is stopped, the replicas start to lag behind, presumably because we are not fetching from the leader anymore. Further examining, the ShutdownableThread.scala object:
> {noformat}
> override def run(): Unit = {
>  info("Starting")
>  try {
>    while (isRunning)
>      doWork()
>  } catch {
>    case e: FatalExitError =>
>      shutdownInitiated.countDown()
>      shutdownComplete.countDown()
>      info("Stopped")
>      Exit.exit(e.statusCode())
>    case e: Throwable =>
>      if (isRunning)
>        error("Error due to", e)
>  } finally {
>    shutdownComplete.countDown()
>  }
>  info("Stopped")
> }{noformat}
> For the Throwable (non-fatal) case, it just exits the while loop and the thread stops doing work. I am not sure whether this is the intended behavior of the ShutdownableThread, or the exception should be caught and we should keep calling doWork()
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)