Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN

[Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>]

Hi Henri,

I don't know about log4j-attic, but yes, the other repositories are active. 
We are in the process of discussing the move, and plan to start it after the 
log4j 1.2.12 release, which should be in the next couple of weeks.

-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@apache.org>
To: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" <Yo...@mpi.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN


>
> Pinging again :)
>
> CVS-wise you've got:
>
> logging-chainsaw/
> logging-log4cxx/
> logging-log4j/
> logging-log4j-attic/
> logging-log4j-sandbox/
> logging-log4net/
> logging-log4php/
> logging-site/
>
> Are they all still active?
>
> The obvious mapping to SVN would be:
>
> logging/
>   chainsaw/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4cxx/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4j/
>     attic/
>     sandbox/
>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>     proper/
>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4net/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4php/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   site/
>
> Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what 
> commons/taglibs uses.
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Mark Womack wrote:
>
>> Henri,
>>
>> I don't know if Yoav replied or not.  Ceki started the migration, but 
>> stopped in the middle.  Someone from log4j needs to pick this up.  I'll 
>> let you know before the end of the week.
>>
>> thanks for the heads up,
>> -Mark
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@apache.org>
>> To: "Shapira, Yoav" <Yo...@mpi.com>; "Mark Womack" 
>> <mw...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:18 PM
>> Subject: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
>>
>>
>>>
>>> There's a JIRA issue for migrating log4j to SVN. Yoav (I think it was 
>>> Yoav, Jira's hanging atm) suggested that log4j needed to decide when the 
>>> best time was to do the migration. Has that happened?
>>>
>>> If so, let me know when you want to do it and I can probably go ahead 
>>> and get things migrated for you. I ran a quick test cvs2svn of 
>>> logging-log4j a bit ago and things looked fine.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>
>>
> 

Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN

[Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>]

On Monday 25 July 2005 11:06, Mark Womack wrote:
> I don't know about log4j-attic, but yes, the other repositories are active.
> We are in the process of discussing the move, and plan to start it after
> the log4j 1.2.12 release, which should be in the next couple of weeks.

AFAIU, the cvs2svn conversion effectively re-does all the user 
activities/steps of the repository one by one. That means that everything 
that in CVS ends up in Attic, will be represented in the SVN database.


Cheers
Niclas