You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by tabish121 <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/06/15 21:11:29 UTC

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145

    ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

    Update to latest release of Qpid JMS

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/tabish121/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-1938

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2145
    
----
commit 952bf12eeb9a6f2fe3528d46fd748adeb6be5d16
Author: Timothy Bish <ta...@...>
Date:   2018-06-15T21:10:18Z

    ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0
    
    Update to latest release of Qpid JMS

----


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by tabish121 <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
  
    There are no updates to proton-j at this time, only client fixes


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by clebertsuconic <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
  
    Ohhhh. I didn’t look on the diff.  You usually update proton together and I thought you included it here.  


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by clebertsuconic <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
  
    I don’t think we should pick components updates on 2.6.x.  Let me know if you have a reason to update it. 


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by tabish121 <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
  
    The only reason you might want to take it is that it contains several fixes for failover handling and artemis provides a Karaf feature for an AMQP client so your users could benefit from that, otherwise it has no impact on the broker as it is only used in testing otherwise.  


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by clebertsuconic <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
  
    I need a vacation :). I’m starting to see things. 


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by tabish121 <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
  
    I targeted the JIRA at 2.7.0 for that reason. 


---

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2145: ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0

Posted by clebertsuconic <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
  
    I was just double checking if it made sense or not.  Wasn’t implying you did. 
    
    
    Thanks 


---