You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> on 2022/01/21 17:57:58 UTC

[VOTE] EOL for HBase 2.3

Hi folks!

Discussion threads:

https://s.apache.org/i56se
https://s.apache.org/w1rit

tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.

+1 for EOL?

Re: [VOTE] EOL for HBase 2.3

Posted by "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1

Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>于2022年1月22日 周六03:25写道:

> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:58 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > Discussion threads:
> >
> > https://s.apache.org/i56se
> > https://s.apache.org/w1rit
> >
> > tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
> >
> > +1 for EOL?
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
>     It's what we’ve earned
> Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
> Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
>    - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
>

Re: [VOTE] EOL for HBase 2.3

Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1


On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:58 AM Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks!
>
> Discussion threads:
>
> https://s.apache.org/i56se
> https://s.apache.org/w1rit
>
> tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
>
> +1 for EOL?
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrew

Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
    It's what we’ve earned
Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
   - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse

Re: [VOTE] EOL for HBase 2.3

Posted by Viraj Jasani <vj...@apache.org>.
+1

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 11:28 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks!
>
> Discussion threads:
>
> https://s.apache.org/i56se
> https://s.apache.org/w1rit
>
> tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
>
> +1 for EOL?
>

Re: [VOTE] EOL for HBase 2.3

Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org>.
Here's my +1.

That's 6 in favor and no other votes. I'll file an issue to track the clean
up work

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 11:25 AM Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:22 PM Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:58 Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks!
> > >
> > > Discussion threads:
> > >
> > > https://s.apache.org/i56se
> > > https://s.apache.org/w1rit
> > >
> > > tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
> > >
> > > +1 for EOL?
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] EOL for HBase 2.3

Posted by Peter Somogyi <ps...@apache.org>.
+1

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 6:22 PM Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:58 Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > Discussion threads:
> >
> > https://s.apache.org/i56se
> > https://s.apache.org/w1rit
> >
> > tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
> >
> > +1 for EOL?
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] EOL for HBase 2.3

Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
+1

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:58 Sean Busbey <bu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks!
>
> Discussion threads:
>
> https://s.apache.org/i56se
> https://s.apache.org/w1rit
>
> tl;dr: we look to have consensus but missed formalizing things.
>
> +1 for EOL?
>