You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to woden-dev@ws.apache.org by Dilshan Edirisuriya <di...@gmail.com> on 2010/06/09 13:37:11 UTC
[proposal] name prefix for new read/write interfaces
Hi,
Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first
patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some
doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA
issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using
the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best
approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are
my suggestions.
1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable"
e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription
2.) Use "E"
e.g - EBinding , EDescription
Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are
welcome.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20
Thank You,
Regards,
Dilshan
Re: [proposal] name prefix for new read/write interfaces
Posted by Dilshan Edirisuriya <di...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sagara,
Thank you for creating the branch. I will use this for my modifications.
Regards,
Dilshan
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Sagara Gunathunga <
sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dilshan ,
>
> Since we are planning to have M9 release soon it is better to do your
> improvements in a branch so I have created a woden-20[1] branch for you.
> Please create your patches based on this branch and attach to Woden-20 JIRA
> issue.
>
>
> [1] -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/woden/branches/woden-20/
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dilshan Edirisuriya <dilshan.ed@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Thank you Lawrence for your reply.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dilshan,
>>>
>>> I think it's most important to make some concrete process. Go with either
>>> naming option. You can always refactor after receiving feedback on your
>>> implementation.
>>>
>>> Lawrence
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Dilshan Edirisuriya <di...@gmail.com> To:
>>> woden-dev@ws.apache.org Date: 06/09/2010 07:37 AM Subject: [proposal]
>>> name prefix for new read/write interfaces
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first
>>> patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some
>>> doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA
>>> issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using
>>> the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best
>>> approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are
>>> my suggestions.
>>>
>>> 1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable"
>>>
>>> e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription
>>>
>>> 2.) Use "E"
>>>
>>> e.g - EBinding , EDescription
>>>
>>>
>>> Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are
>>> welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] - *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20*<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank You,
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Dilshan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sagara Gunathunga
>
> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esagara/>
>
Re: [proposal] name prefix for new read/write interfaces
Posted by Sagara Gunathunga <sa...@gmail.com>.
Dilshan ,
Since we are planning to have M9 release soon it is better to do your
improvements in a branch so I have created a woden-20[1] branch for you.
Please create your patches based on this branch and attach to Woden-20 JIRA
issue.
[1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/woden/branches/woden-20/
Thanks,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dilshan Edirisuriya
<di...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thank you Lawrence for your reply.
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Dilshan,
>>
>> I think it's most important to make some concrete process. Go with either
>> naming option. You can always refactor after receiving feedback on your
>> implementation.
>>
>> Lawrence
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Dilshan Edirisuriya <di...@gmail.com> To:
>> woden-dev@ws.apache.org Date: 06/09/2010 07:37 AM Subject: [proposal]
>> name prefix for new read/write interfaces
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first
>> patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some
>> doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA
>> issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using
>> the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best
>> approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are
>> my suggestions.
>>
>> 1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable"
>>
>> e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription
>>
>> 2.) Use "E"
>>
>> e.g - EBinding , EDescription
>>
>>
>> Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are
>> welcome.
>>
>>
>> [1] - *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20*<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20>
>>
>>
>> Thank You,
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dilshan
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Sagara Gunathunga
Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
Re: [proposal] name prefix for new read/write interfaces
Posted by Dilshan Edirisuriya <di...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Lawrence for your reply.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dilshan,
>
> I think it's most important to make some concrete process. Go with either
> naming option. You can always refactor after receiving feedback on your
> implementation.
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
> From: Dilshan Edirisuriya <di...@gmail.com> To:
> woden-dev@ws.apache.org Date: 06/09/2010 07:37 AM Subject: [proposal] name
> prefix for new read/write interfaces
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first
> patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some
> doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA
> issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using
> the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best
> approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are
> my suggestions.
>
> 1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable"
>
> e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription
>
> 2.) Use "E"
>
> e.g - EBinding , EDescription
>
>
> Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are
> welcome.
>
>
> [1] - *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20*<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
> Regards,
>
> Dilshan
>
>
>
Re: [proposal] name prefix for new read/write interfaces
Posted by Lawrence Mandel <lm...@ca.ibm.com>.
Hi Dilshan,
I think it's most important to make some concrete process. Go with either
naming option. You can always refactor after receiving feedback on your
implementation.
Lawrence
From:
Dilshan Edirisuriya <di...@gmail.com>
To:
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Date:
06/09/2010 07:37 AM
Subject:
[proposal] name prefix for new read/write interfaces
Hi,
Thanks you for the comments given to [1] , I am ready to submit my first
patch that contains set of new read/write interfaces . Still I have some
doubts about the naming conventions according to our discussion on JIRA
issue. We discussed that "Editable" prefix is too long and by make using
the same name as read-only components may lead to confusion. So best
approach is to use a short prefix according to my knowledge. Following are
my suggestions.
1.) Use "Ed" instead of "Editable"
e.g - EdBinding , EdDescription
2.) Use "E"
e.g - EBinding , EDescription
Please provide your feedback on above. Any other alternative ideas are
welcome.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-20
Thank You,
Regards,
Dilshan