You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com> on 2017/03/27 10:29:46 UTC
[VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
Artifacts can be found there:
http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
The release is signed with the key:
https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
The vote will end on 31/3/2017
+1 from me.
Thanks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=dYHK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Clay Leeds <th...@gmail.com>.
+1
Warm regards,
Clay Leeds - the.webmaestro@gmail.com
"My religion is simple. My religion is kindness."
HH the Dalai Lama of Tibet
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:29 AM, Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>
>
>
> Artifacts can be found there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>
>
>
> The release is signed with the key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>
> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>
> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>
> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>
> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>
> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>
> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>
> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>
> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>
> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>
> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>
> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>
> =dYHK
>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Chris <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Glenn,
On 27/03/2017 20:35, Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was
>> eg 1.8.
>>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep an
> eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work beyond
> this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we use for FOP
> dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?
2.3-SNAPSHOT is fine. We do releases quite infrequently, so it seems
unlikely we will be using the third digit with the current yearly
release cycle.
>
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>> batik).
>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>> causing
>> problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1984@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
>>> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The release is signed with the key:
>>>
>>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>>>
>>> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>>>
>>> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>>>
>>> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>>>
>>> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>>>
>>> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>>>
>>> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>>>
>>> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>>>
>>> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>>>
>>> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>>>
>>> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>>>
>>> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>>>
>>> =dYHK
>>>
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Chris <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Simon,
I would rephrase it as: When we are releasing all the projects together
(which is the case today), then we should try to sync up the bundled
JARs. When we are only releasing FOP it is clear the previous Batik
release would then be out of date.
Thanks
Chris
On 28/03/2017 11:03, Simon Steiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since batik includes fop-transcoder-allinone-*.jar and fop includes batik-all-*.jar, we would always need to release both these projects together at the same time.
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris [mailto:bowditch_chris@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 28 March 2017 10:30
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> I agree we should be sync'ing the releases.
>
> On 27/03/2017 22:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
>> Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to
>> sync them. Also, please update FOP to use the same
>> xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as is used by Batik.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner
>> <si...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to
>>> redo the other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1984@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
>>> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
>>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>
>>> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version
>>> discrepancies between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK
>>> source and binary
>>> artifacts:
>>>
>>> - FOP 2.2 has
>>> - serializer-2.7.0.jar
>>> - BATIK 1.9 has
>>> - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>>>
>>> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I
>>> would expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
>>>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases
>>>>> which was eg 1.8.
>>>>>
>>>> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to
>>>> keep an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should
>>>> have a discussion on version policy for both dev and release
>>>> processes; for example, we now need to choose dev versions for use
>>>> in upcoming work beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the
>>>> following should we use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>>>>
>>>> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>>>> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>>
>>>> what do others think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>>>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>>>>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>>>
>>>>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>>>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>>>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0
>>>>> (for batik).
>>>>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
>>>>> have been
>>>>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>>>>> qualifier
>>>>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have
>>>>> deleted
>>> the
>>>>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end
>>>>> up causing
>>>>> problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> G.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>>>>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
>>>>>> zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release is signed with the key:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =dYHK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>> general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
> .
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Since batik includes fop-transcoder-allinone-*.jar and fop includes batik-all-*.jar, we would always need to release both these projects together at the same time.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris [mailto:bowditch_chris@hotmail.com]
Sent: 28 March 2017 10:30
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
I agree we should be sync'ing the releases.
On 27/03/2017 22:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to
> sync them. Also, please update FOP to use the same
> xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as is used by Batik.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner
> <si...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to
>> redo the other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1984@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
>> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version
>> discrepancies between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK
>> source and binary
>> artifacts:
>>
>> - FOP 2.2 has
>> - serializer-2.7.0.jar
>> - BATIK 1.9 has
>> - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>>
>> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I
>> would expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
>>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases
>>>> which was eg 1.8.
>>>>
>>> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to
>>> keep an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should
>>> have a discussion on version policy for both dev and release
>>> processes; for example, we now need to choose dev versions for use
>>> in upcoming work beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the
>>> following should we use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>>>
>>> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> what do others think?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>>>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>>
>>>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>>>
>>>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0
>>>> (for batik).
>>>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
>>>> have been
>>>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>>>> qualifier
>>>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have
>>>> deleted
>> the
>>>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end
>>>> up causing
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> G.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>>>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
>>>>> zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The release is signed with the key:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>>>>>
>>>>> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>>>>>
>>>>> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>>>>>
>>>>> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>>>>>
>>>>> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>>>>>
>>>>> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>>>>>
>>>>> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>>>>>
>>>>> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>>>>>
>>>>> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>>>>>
>>>>> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>>>>>
>>>>> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>>>>>
>>>>> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>>>>>
>>>>> =dYHK
>>>>>
>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>> general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>> general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Chris <bo...@hotmail.com>.
I agree we should be sync'ing the releases.
On 27/03/2017 22:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to sync
> them. Also, please update FOP to use the same xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as
> is used by Batik.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the
>> other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1984@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
>> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies
>> between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
>> artifacts:
>>
>> - FOP 2.2 has
>> - serializer-2.7.0.jar
>> - BATIK 1.9 has
>> - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>>
>> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would
>> expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
>>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which
>>>> was eg 1.8.
>>>>
>>> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep
>>> an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
>>> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
>>> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work
>>> beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we
>>> use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>>>
>>> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>> what do others think?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>>>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>>>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>>>
>>>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>>>
>>>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>>>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>>>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>>>> batik).
>>>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
>>>> have been
>>>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>>>> qualifier
>>>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted
>> the
>>>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>>>> causing
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> G.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>>>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
>>>>> zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Artifacts can be found there:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The release is signed with the key:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>>>>>
>>>>> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>>>>>
>>>>> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>>>>>
>>>>> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>>>>>
>>>>> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>>>>>
>>>>> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>>>>>
>>>>> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>>>>>
>>>>> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>>>>>
>>>>> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>>>>>
>>>>> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>>>>>
>>>>> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>>>>>
>>>>> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>>>>>
>>>>> =dYHK
>>>>>
>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
Since I am the only voter who is asking for fixes, I think it best to sync
them. Also, please update FOP to use the same xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar as
is used by Batik.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the
> other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1984@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> Hi,
>
> Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies
> between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
> artifacts:
>
> - FOP 2.2 has
> - serializer-2.7.0.jar
> - BATIK 1.9 has
> - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
>
> Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would
> expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
> > simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which
> >> was eg 1.8.
> >>
> >
> > understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep
> > an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> > discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> > example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work
> > beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we
> > use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
> >
> > - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> > - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> > - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > what do others think?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> >> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
> >> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
> >>
> >> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
> >>
> >> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
> >> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
> >> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
> >> batik).
> >> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
> >> have been
> >> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
> >> qualifier
> >> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted
> the
> >> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
> >> causing
> >> problems.
> >>
> >> G.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
> >> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >
> >> > Hash: SHA1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
> >> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Artifacts can be found there:
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The release is signed with the key:
> >> >
> >> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > +1 from me.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> >
> >> > Version: GnuPG v1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
> >> >
> >> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
> >> >
> >> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
> >> >
> >> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
> >> >
> >> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
> >> >
> >> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
> >> >
> >> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
> >> >
> >> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
> >> >
> >> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
> >> >
> >> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
> >> >
> >> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
> >> >
> >> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
> >> >
> >> > =dYHK
> >> >
> >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Steiner [mailto:simonsteiner1984@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Hi,
Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
artifacts:
- FOP 2.2 has
- serializer-2.7.0.jar
- BATIK 1.9 has
- xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which
>> was eg 1.8.
>>
>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep
> an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work
> beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we
> use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>> batik).
>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
>> have been
>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>> causing
>> problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
>> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Artifacts can be found there:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The release is signed with the key:
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>> >
>> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>> >
>> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>> >
>> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>> >
>> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>> >
>> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>> >
>> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>> >
>> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>> >
>> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>> >
>> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>> >
>> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>> >
>> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>> >
>> > =dYHK
>> >
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20
To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
artifacts:
- FOP 2.2 has
- serializer-2.7.0.jar
- BATIK 1.9 has
- xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which
>> was eg 1.8.
>>
>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep
> an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work
> beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we
> use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>> batik).
>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process
>> have been
>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>> causing
>> problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source
>> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Artifacts can be found there:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The release is signed with the key:
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>> >
>> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>> >
>> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>> >
>> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>> >
>> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>> >
>> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>> >
>> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>> >
>> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>> >
>> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>> >
>> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>> >
>> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>> >
>> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>> >
>> > =dYHK
>> >
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies
between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary
artifacts:
- FOP 2.2 has
- serializer-2.7.0.jar
- BATIK 1.9 has
- xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar
Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would
expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <
> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was
>> eg 1.8.
>>
>
> understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep an
> eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
> discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
> example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work beyond
> this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we use for FOP
> dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
>
> - 2.3-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
> - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> what do others think?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
>> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
>> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>>
>> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>>
>> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
>> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
>> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
>> batik).
>> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have
>> been
>> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
>> qualifier
>> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
>> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
>> causing
>> problems.
>>
>> G.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <
>> simonsteiner1984@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
>> > modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Artifacts can be found there:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The release is signed with the key:
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>> >
>> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>> >
>> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>> >
>> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>> >
>> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>> >
>> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>> >
>> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>> >
>> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>> >
>> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>> >
>> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>> >
>> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>> >
>> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>> >
>> > =dYHK
>> >
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was
> eg 1.8.
>
understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep an
eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a
discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for
example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work beyond
this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we use for FOP
dev builds after this release and up to the next release:
- 2.3-SNAPSHOT
- 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT
- 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT
what do others think?
>
> Thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
> To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
>
> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
>
> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for
> batik).
> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT"
> qualifier
> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up
> causing
> problems.
>
> G.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1984@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
> > modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
> >
> >
> >
> > Artifacts can be found there:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
> >
> >
> >
> > The release is signed with the key:
> >
> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > Version: GnuPG v1
> >
> >
> >
> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
> >
> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
> >
> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
> >
> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
> >
> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
> >
> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
> >
> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
> >
> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
> >
> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
> >
> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
> >
> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
> >
> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
> >
> > =dYHK
> >
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which was eg 1.8.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23
To: XML Graphics Project <ge...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
- Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
- I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for batik).
The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT" qualifier
is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up causing
problems.
G.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>
>
>
> Artifacts can be found there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>
>
>
> The release is signed with the key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>
> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>
> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>
> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>
> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>
> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>
> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>
> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>
> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>
> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>
> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>
> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>
> =dYHK
>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt)
Posted by Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>.
There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well.
- Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1.
- I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2
instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for batik).
The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process have been
2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT" qualifier
is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the
final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up causing
problems.
G.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner <si...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source zip/tgz
> modified to add pom.xml's since last vote.
>
>
>
> Artifacts can be found there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/
>
>
>
> The release is signed with the key:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS
>
>
>
> The vote will end on 31/3/2017
>
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
>
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn
>
> POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1
>
> UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy
>
> 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi
>
> mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j
>
> i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y
>
> TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM
>
> fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5
>
> dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw
>
> 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww
>
> Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE
>
> ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6
>
> =dYHK
>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>