You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2015/01/15 21:56:10 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1652268 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Ummm.... Who cast the required 3rd vote?? Or is Win32
not covered?

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 3:46 PM, wrowe@apache.org wrote:
> 
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Thu Jan 15 20:46:45 2015
> New Revision: 1652268
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1652268
> Log:
> Larger win32 os-specific patch applied (post-2.4.11 to avoid disruption)
> 
> Modified:
>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1652268&r1=1652267&r2=1652268&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Jan 15 20:46:45 2015
> @@ -109,14 +109,6 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>   [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
> 
> -   * mpm_winnt service.c: Normalize all error and status messages, clean up
> -     source formatting, and accept utf-8 service names/descriptions for i18n.
> -     trunk patches: http://svn.apache.org/r1611165
> -                    http://svn.apache.org/r1611169
> -                    http://svn.apache.org/r1611244
> -     2.4.x patches: trunk works
> -     +1: wrowe, gsmith
> -
>    * mod_systemd: New module, for integration with systemd on Linux.
>      trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1393976
>                   http://svn.apache.org/r1393997
> 
> 


Re: svn commit: r1652268 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Posted by Ivan Tessmer <qu...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 15, 2015 4:36 PM, "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:

> Yeppers... thx.
>
> > On Jan 15, 2015, at 5:24 PM, wrowe@rowe-clan.net wrote:
> >
> > --------- Original Message ---------
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1652268 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> > From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
> > Date: 1/15/15 2:56 pm
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> >
> > Ummm.... Who cast the required 3rd vote?? Or is Win32
> > not covered?
> >
> > AIUI, this falls under platform-specific patches.  No?
>
>

Re: svn commit: r1652268 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Yeppers... thx.

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 5:24 PM, wrowe@rowe-clan.net wrote:
> 
> --------- Original Message ---------
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1652268 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
> Date: 1/15/15 2:56 pm
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> 
> Ummm.... Who cast the required 3rd vote?? Or is Win32
> not covered? 
>  
> AIUI, this falls under platform-specific patches.  No?


RE: Re: svn commit: r1652268 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Posted by wr...@rowe-clan.net.
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: svn commit: r1652268 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
Date: 1/15/15 2:56 pm
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

Ummm.... Who cast the required 3rd vote?? Or is Win32
 not covered? 
  
AIUI, this falls under platform-specific patches.  No?