You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/06 09:53:48 UTC
Decouple Gson from XML Stream API base JSON approach
Hi devs,
Currently newly added JSON XML Stream API base approach in trunk, tightly
couple with google-gson. I think it is good to have flexibility to use
other JSON Stream APIs(like Jakson) with this.
Here we can use factory method pattern to create JSON
XMLStreamReaders/writers . And we can provide an api to implement Gson,
Jakson or any other Json Stream support api to write the logic under that.
we can provide Factory classes to create JSONXMLStreamReaders/Writers with
Gson or Jakson or other.
Thoughts are welcome.
--
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
Re: Decouple Gson from XML Stream API base JSON approach
Posted by Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi devs,
I created a JIRA issue[1] for this. And start working on this.
Thanks,
Shameera.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-5513
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Can i assume nobody has problem with this procedure and ok with using JSR
> 353 for this implementations? If so i would like to open a new JIRA issue
> for this and working on this.
>
> Regards,
> Shameera.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Sagara Gunathunga <
>> sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>
>>>> Currently newly added JSON XML Stream API base approach in trunk,
>>>> tightly couple with google-gson. I think it is good to have flexibility to
>>>> use other JSON Stream APIs(like Jakson) with this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good point but IMHO we should use JSR 353 (Java API for JSON processing
>>> ) which being more or less finalized by now for above task.
>>>
>>
>> +1 , Yes that would be good to use standard API,
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>>
>>> [1] - http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=353
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here we can use factory method pattern to create JSON
>>>> XMLStreamReaders/writers . And we can provide an api to implement Gson,
>>>> Jakson or any other Json Stream support api to write the logic under that.
>>>>
>>>> we can provide Factory classes to create JSONXMLStreamReaders/Writers
>>>> with Gson or Jakson or other.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts are welcome.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>
>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>>
>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
--
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
Re: Decouple Gson from XML Stream API base JSON approach
Posted by Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi devs,
Can i assume nobody has problem with this procedure and ok with using JSR
353 for this implementations? If so i would like to open a new JIRA issue
for this and working on this.
Regards,
Shameera.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka
<sh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Sagara Gunathunga <
> sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> Currently newly added JSON XML Stream API base approach in trunk,
>>> tightly couple with google-gson. I think it is good to have flexibility to
>>> use other JSON Stream APIs(like Jakson) with this.
>>>
>>
>> Good point but IMHO we should use JSR 353 (Java API for JSON processing
>> ) which being more or less finalized by now for above task.
>>
>
> +1 , Yes that would be good to use standard API,
>
> Regards,
> Shameera.
>
>>
>> [1] - http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=353
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Here we can use factory method pattern to create JSON
>>> XMLStreamReaders/writers . And we can provide an api to implement Gson,
>>> Jakson or any other Json Stream support api to write the logic under that.
>>>
>>> we can provide Factory classes to create JSONXMLStreamReaders/Writers
>>> with Gson or Jakson or other.
>>>
>>> Thoughts are welcome.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>
>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
--
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
Re: Decouple Gson from XML Stream API base JSON approach
Posted by Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Sagara Gunathunga <
sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Currently newly added JSON XML Stream API base approach in trunk, tightly
>> couple with google-gson. I think it is good to have flexibility to use
>> other JSON Stream APIs(like Jakson) with this.
>>
>
> Good point but IMHO we should use JSR 353 (Java API for JSON processing
> ) which being more or less finalized by now for above task.
>
+1 , Yes that would be good to use standard API,
Regards,
Shameera.
>
> [1] - http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=353
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>>
>> Here we can use factory method pattern to create JSON
>> XMLStreamReaders/writers . And we can provide an api to implement Gson,
>> Jakson or any other Json Stream support api to write the logic under that.
>>
>> we can provide Factory classes to create JSONXMLStreamReaders/Writers
>> with Gson or Jakson or other.
>>
>> Thoughts are welcome.
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sagara Gunathunga
>
> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
--
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
Re: Decouple Gson from XML Stream API base JSON approach
Posted by Sagara Gunathunga <sa...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka
<sh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Currently newly added JSON XML Stream API base approach in trunk, tightly
> couple with google-gson. I think it is good to have flexibility to use
> other JSON Stream APIs(like Jakson) with this.
>
Good point but IMHO we should use JSR 353 (Java API for JSON processing )
which being more or less finalized by now for above task.
[1] - http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=353
Thanks !
>
> Here we can use factory method pattern to create JSON
> XMLStreamReaders/writers . And we can provide an api to implement Gson,
> Jakson or any other Json Stream support api to write the logic under that.
>
> we can provide Factory classes to create JSONXMLStreamReaders/Writers with
> Gson or Jakson or other.
>
> Thoughts are welcome.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>
--
Sagara Gunathunga
Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara