You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Dmytro Pishchukhin <dm...@gmail.com> on 2013/02/12 14:41:38 UTC
osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Hi,
I've just found that ActiveMQ 5.8.0 artifacts do no contain OSGi
headers in manifest files. What was the reason to remove them?
Thanks in advance.
--
Best regards,
Dmytro Pishchukhin
Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi,
I addressed this issue in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4317
Can you test the next snapshot when it become available?
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you raise a Jira for this?
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, aladdin0 <Se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can not install feature "activemq-camel" in Karaf, because activemq-camel is
>> not a valid osgi bundle:
>>
>> karaf@root> features:addurl
>> mvn:org.apache.camel.karaf/apache-camel/2.10.3/xml/features
>> karaf@root> features:addurl
>> mvn:org.apache.activemq/activemq-karaf/5.8.0/xml/features
>> karaf@root> features:install activemq-camel
>> Error executing command: Jar is not a bundle, no Bundle-SymbolicName
>> mvn:org.apache.activemq/activemq-camel/5.8.0
>> karaf@root>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/osgi-manifest-headers-are-missed-in-5-8-0-release-tp4663256p4663378.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi,
can you raise a Jira for this?
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, aladdin0 <Se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can not install feature "activemq-camel" in Karaf, because activemq-camel is
> not a valid osgi bundle:
>
> karaf@root> features:addurl
> mvn:org.apache.camel.karaf/apache-camel/2.10.3/xml/features
> karaf@root> features:addurl
> mvn:org.apache.activemq/activemq-karaf/5.8.0/xml/features
> karaf@root> features:install activemq-camel
> Error executing command: Jar is not a bundle, no Bundle-SymbolicName
> mvn:org.apache.activemq/activemq-camel/5.8.0
> karaf@root>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/osgi-manifest-headers-are-missed-in-5-8-0-release-tp4663256p4663378.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Posted by aladdin0 <Se...@gmail.com>.
Can not install feature "activemq-camel" in Karaf, because activemq-camel is
not a valid osgi bundle:
karaf@root> features:addurl
mvn:org.apache.camel.karaf/apache-camel/2.10.3/xml/features
karaf@root> features:addurl
mvn:org.apache.activemq/activemq-karaf/5.8.0/xml/features
karaf@root> features:install activemq-camel
Error executing command: Jar is not a bundle, no Bundle-SymbolicName
mvn:org.apache.activemq/activemq-camel/5.8.0
karaf@root>
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/osgi-manifest-headers-are-missed-in-5-8-0-release-tp4663256p4663378.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Just to add, that for this release we aimed at ease of use in the osgi
land. There's room to make things more modular (according to the new
modules of the project itself) in the future and any help with that is
more than welcomed :)
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> Hi Dmytro,
>
> with previous version you'd use activemq-core, which also contained
> all broker classes, so there's no much of a difference now. You only
> need to use activemq-osgi bundle instead of activemq-core one. There's
> an activemq-client feature among karat features that's supposed to be
> used if you're only interesting using a client-side stuff. Also, for
> the http transport you should use activemq-http feature (note that
> activemq-optional module doesn't exist anymore, so you should use
> activemq-http instead).
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin
> <dm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dejan,
>>
>> thank you for details.
>>
>> As I see, activemq-osgi contains all functionality (client, broker,
>> all transports, dependencies etc.). I'd like to use only small
>> functionality sub-scope (e.g. client + http transport). With previous
>> versions, I can use bundles/modules I need. With the latest version, I
>> have to include all functionality into my osgi framework and I don't
>> have any way to configure it. Of course, I can wrap the other activemq
>> jars and add osgi manifest headers on the fly, but it's not "off the
>> shelf" solution. Or did I miss something?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Dmytro Pishchukhin
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>> Hi Dmytro,
>>>
>>> we changed the modules of the activemq for 5.8.0 and how it integrates
>>> with osgi containers. You can find more details on it here
>>>
>>> http://activemq.apache.org/osgi-integration.html
>>>
>>> but in a nutshell, there's now activemq-osgi bundle that incorporates
>>> all classes and is ready to be used in osgi land. You can also take a
>>> look at karat features for 5.8.0 and see how it's deployed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin
>>> <dm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've just found that ActiveMQ 5.8.0 artifacts do no contain OSGi
>>>> headers in manifest files. What was the reason to remove them?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Dmytro Pishchukhin
Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi Dmytro,
with previous version you'd use activemq-core, which also contained
all broker classes, so there's no much of a difference now. You only
need to use activemq-osgi bundle instead of activemq-core one. There's
an activemq-client feature among karat features that's supposed to be
used if you're only interesting using a client-side stuff. Also, for
the http transport you should use activemq-http feature (note that
activemq-optional module doesn't exist anymore, so you should use
activemq-http instead).
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin
<dm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> thank you for details.
>
> As I see, activemq-osgi contains all functionality (client, broker,
> all transports, dependencies etc.). I'd like to use only small
> functionality sub-scope (e.g. client + http transport). With previous
> versions, I can use bundles/modules I need. With the latest version, I
> have to include all functionality into my osgi framework and I don't
> have any way to configure it. Of course, I can wrap the other activemq
> jars and add osgi manifest headers on the fly, but it's not "off the
> shelf" solution. Or did I miss something?
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dmytro Pishchukhin
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>> Hi Dmytro,
>>
>> we changed the modules of the activemq for 5.8.0 and how it integrates
>> with osgi containers. You can find more details on it here
>>
>> http://activemq.apache.org/osgi-integration.html
>>
>> but in a nutshell, there's now activemq-osgi bundle that incorporates
>> all classes and is ready to be used in osgi land. You can also take a
>> look at karat features for 5.8.0 and see how it's deployed.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>> ----------------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>> Twitter: @dejanb
>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin
>> <dm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've just found that ActiveMQ 5.8.0 artifacts do no contain OSGi
>>> headers in manifest files. What was the reason to remove them?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dmytro Pishchukhin
Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Posted by Dmytro Pishchukhin <dm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dejan,
thank you for details.
As I see, activemq-osgi contains all functionality (client, broker,
all transports, dependencies etc.). I'd like to use only small
functionality sub-scope (e.g. client + http transport). With previous
versions, I can use bundles/modules I need. With the latest version, I
have to include all functionality into my osgi framework and I don't
have any way to configure it. Of course, I can wrap the other activemq
jars and add osgi manifest headers on the fly, but it's not "off the
shelf" solution. Or did I miss something?
--
Best regards,
Dmytro Pishchukhin
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> Hi Dmytro,
>
> we changed the modules of the activemq for 5.8.0 and how it integrates
> with osgi containers. You can find more details on it here
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/osgi-integration.html
>
> but in a nutshell, there's now activemq-osgi bundle that incorporates
> all classes and is ready to be used in osgi land. You can also take a
> look at karat features for 5.8.0 and see how it's deployed.
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin
> <dm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just found that ActiveMQ 5.8.0 artifacts do no contain OSGi
>> headers in manifest files. What was the reason to remove them?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Dmytro Pishchukhin
Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Hi Dmytro,
we changed the modules of the activemq for 5.8.0 and how it integrates
with osgi containers. You can find more details on it here
http://activemq.apache.org/osgi-integration.html
but in a nutshell, there's now activemq-osgi bundle that incorporates
all classes and is ready to be used in osgi land. You can also take a
look at karat features for 5.8.0 and see how it's deployed.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin
<dm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just found that ActiveMQ 5.8.0 artifacts do no contain OSGi
> headers in manifest files. What was the reason to remove them?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dmytro Pishchukhin