You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org> on 2016/06/12 23:26:43 UTC
[DISCUSS] RE: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilles [mailto:gilles@harfang.homelinux.org]
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 15:08
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...
>
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:33:58 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > -1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Reason for objection:
> >
> > I think the framing of this vote is confusing.
> >
> > 1. There appears to be less ability to go to TLP than there was at
> > the time the previous motion passed.
> >
> > 2. The discussion (but not the [VOTE]) speaks of going to TLP via
> > the incubator. It has to be one or the other. Propose a podling to
> > Incubator or propose a TLP to the Board. There is no assurance that
> > a
> > podling will graduate and it doesn't fit to make that a condition.
> > One could raise the special circumstances at general-incubator, but I
> > think that works best with something specific (but malleable) in
> > hand.
> >
> > 3. The Incubator is reluctant to start podlings from scratch, as
> > Niall observes.
>
> Could you please expand on how 3 Commons PMC members and 3 would-be
> contributors are assimilated to "scratch"?
>
> Thanks,
> Gilles
[orcmid]
I don't have that information. It probably doesn't matter with regard to the larger issues here, including knowing what the agreed next-action is when the [VOTE] succeeds with binding votes.
- Dennis
>
[ ... ]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org