[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-3136) Relocation of Avatica classes breaks compatibilty between older version of thin-client/PQS

["Josh Elser (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-3136:
--------------------------------
    Attachment: PHOENIX-3136.001.patch

Here's .001 which just removes the relocations for {{org.apache.calcite}} on the queryserver and queryserver-thin modules.

Verified a local 4.8 install works. Let me pull up an 4.7 install side-by-side and do some more testing before I commit.

> Relocation of Avatica classes breaks compatibilty between older version of thin-client/PQS
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3136
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-3136.001.patch
>
>
> It was recently brought to my attention by [~holman.lan0@gmail.com] that the shading change will break all previous versions of the thin client from working with the newer PQS (and vice versa).
> Avatica uses the full class name in the message to identify what protobuf message to use to deserialize the bytes from the wire. As such, an older thin client would be expecting these protobuf classes to look like {{org.apache.calcite.avatica.proto.Responses$PrepareResponse}}. However after PHOENIX-2535, PQS would be sending back {{org.apache.phoenix.shaded.org.apache.calcite.avatica.proto.Responses$PrepareResponse}}. Both are trying to refer to the same Java class, but we can't disambiguate presently.
> Long term, I think the protocol itself will have to be updated in Avatica to be a little less brittle in this regard (I did not originally consider the implications that client/server might *have* the classes, but with a different name than what we had in Avatica).
> Short term, we can undo the relocation of the Avatica classes in the thin-client and queryserver artifacts. I will be working on this post-haste. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)