You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-user@james.apache.org by "Varley, Roger" <Ro...@atosorigin.com> on 2004/11/25 13:37:19 UTC
RE: Configuring James to route all outgoing mail to an Exchange Server [FIXED]
Doh!
The gateway and gatewayPort tags are commented out in the bog-standard James install. Uncommenting them has the desired effect and James is now sending all remote mail via Exchange.
I can't believe I can be that stupid!
Regards
Roger
__________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group
liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the
sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender
does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be
liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.
__________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org
RE: Configuring James to route all outgoing mail to an Exchange Server [FIXED]
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> The gateway and gatewayPort tags are commented out in the
> bog-standard James install.
Correct. By default, JAMES would be configured to BE a gateway, rather than
to use one.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org