You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2014/02/26 23:04:52 UTC
[FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer
3.0 - RC2)
It will be great to find out what IntelliJ's assumptions about a Flex SDK
are. For FB, the main issue was the introduction of new compiler options
like mxml.children-as-data.
FB couldn't accept them in flex-config.xml because we're still using MXMLC
and ASC2.0 to compile the code so for FB we have these eclipse launch
configurations that you run in order to compile and/or cross-compile the
code. The installer creates these launch configs. Maybe we'll have to
create a set for IntelliJ as well.
Someday we'll feel confident enough to not ship MXMLC in a FlexJS release
at all and rely on Falcon and then we may be able to get rid of the launch
config requirement.
-Alex
On 2/26/14 10:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <ca...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>+1
>
>Note: I finally get it working updating my /etc/launchd.conf to point
>JAVA_HOME to java7
>I think this should be referenced for mac installations
>(my next step is try FlexJS sdk with IntelliJ IDEA for initial basic use)
>
>
>
>2014-02-26 18:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.0 to be
>> released.
>>
>> Issues addressed in this release:
>> - Installer upgraded to run ant scripts in the binary packages it
>>installs.
>> - Dev builds are now hidden by default. To see dev builds, right-click
>> and choose
>> "Show Dev Builds"
>> - You can enable a cache of downloads by right-clicking and configuring
>> the cache
>>
>> The Apache Flex SDK 4.12.0 RC2 is configured to use ant scripts for
>> installation.
>> You can determine that the ant script is running because the order of
>>the
>> options
>> has the font libraries last (otherwise the remoting option is last).
>>The
>> installer
>> should also be able to install the Nightly for FlexJS. If you want to
>>try
>> installing
>> a nightly for Falcon or FalconJX, please choose an existing Flex SDK
>> folder.
>>
>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/
>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/>
>>
>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>> available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/binaries
>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/binaries>
>>
>> As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version.
>>
>> Before voting please review the sections:
>> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>
>> Vote
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Carlos Rovira
>Director de Tecnología
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>F: +34 912 94 80 80
>http://www.codeoscopic.com
>http://www.directwriter.es
>http://www.avant2.es
Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
Installer 3.0 - RC2)
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
I'll be experimenting this days with the environment to figure what is
needed. I'll return with more data as I could analyze it.
Btw, one thing I'm finding is how to get source code for FlexJS SWCs. This
for example, is something I had directly due to maven nature of Flex
project, but without maven it seems (or at least I can't find) there's no
way to assign source code to SWC libraries...
I'll keep playing with the IDE and will return back to this thread when I
have some useful data :)
2014-02-27 0:36 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> Nice! So what kinds of things are needed to make it "public ready"?
> Changes to the FlexJS packaging or changes to IntelliJ or both?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 2/26/14 3:20 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <ca...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >here's the link to the image:
> >
> >
> http://i2.wp.com/www.madeinflex.com/wp-content/uploads/rtMedia/users/5/201
> >4/02/flexjs_intellij_basics_setup.png
> >
> >I think we'll need improve the IDE support over time since my set up is
> >tied to the build.xml and build_example.xml location and all the env vars.
> >Right now this setup will speed up people working in this group since it
> >throw editor errors when typing and other commodities.
> >
> >regarding your question, I created a Flash project and select the Apache
> >FlexJS SDK from the installer. As I say I choose the location to reside
> >inside "examples" folder and add the 3 SWCs in libs as global libraries.
> >This is not "public ready" but as I said a great step forward to get
> >something less tied to system variables and specific folder setup
> >requirements in the actual FlexJS SDK examples folder. So intellij users
> >with could get interested in this setup to try FlexJS and starting playing
> >with it ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2014-02-26 23:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos.
> >>
> >> That's good news. The image didn't come through to my email though.
> >>
> >> I'm not worried about stripping things out for IntelliJ that FB
> >>required.
> >> We'll have to keep them around to keep FB happy. As long as IntelliJ
> >> thought the FlexJS folder was a valid SDK that's great!
> >>
> >> Do you think FlexJS users are going to be satisfied with having to
> >>setup a
> >> build.xml for their projects? That's the main reason we did launch
> >>configs
> >> for FB, so users could just create new FB projects and compile them
> >>without
> >> having to mess with Ant.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> From: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com<mailto:
> >> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>>
> >> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <
> >> dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>>
> >> Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:41 PM
> >> To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>"
> >><dev@flex.apache.org
> >> <ma...@flex.apache.org>>
> >> Subject: Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
> >> Installer 3.0 - RC2)
> >>
> >> Hi Alex,
> >>
> >> in IntelliJ things seems more easy since I really doesn't need the
> >>launch
> >> configs like the ones in FB. For example, I add the build.xml file and
> >> running it from the IDE is sufficient for me then I test it in a
> >>browser. I
> >> think IntelliJ needs a valid Flex SDK, but don't know if in this IDE we
> >> already can remove some legacy things that are needed in FB. If you
> >>share a
> >> list off things I could remove I could test it and report results.
> >>
> >> There's some strange things: For example, the project builds
> >>successfully
> >> but at the end of the log it reports "fail"...don't know why right now
> >> since all it's ok.
> >>
> >> Btw, I'm trying to create a typical TODO List sample to get more
> >>familiar
> >> with the framework (I already commit the initial example classes), and I
> >> think I'll make a separate thread to ask some related things about
> >>FlexJS
> >> internals.
> >>
> >> I attach an image so you can see the final result (very promising, isn't
> >> it? :)).[Imágenes integradas 1]
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-02-26 23:04 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com>>:
> >> It will be great to find out what IntelliJ's assumptions about a Flex
> >>SDK
> >> are. For FB, the main issue was the introduction of new compiler
> >>options
> >> like mxml.children-as-data.
> >> FB couldn't accept them in flex-config.xml because we're still using
> >>MXMLC
> >> and ASC2.0 to compile the code so for FB we have these eclipse launch
> >> configurations that you run in order to compile and/or cross-compile the
> >> code. The installer creates these launch configs. Maybe we'll have to
> >> create a set for IntelliJ as well.
> >>
> >> Someday we'll feel confident enough to not ship MXMLC in a FlexJS
> >>release
> >> at all and rely on Falcon and then we may be able to get rid of the
> >>launch
> >> config requirement.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 2/26/14 10:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com
> >> <ma...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> >+1
> >> >
> >> >Note: I finally get it working updating my /etc/launchd.conf to point
> >> >JAVA_HOME to java7
> >> >I think this should be referenced for mac installations
> >> >(my next step is try FlexJS sdk with IntelliJ IDEA for initial basic
> >>use)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >2014-02-26 18:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com>>:
> >> >
> >> >> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.0 to be
> >> >> released.
> >> >>
> >> >> Issues addressed in this release:
> >> >> - Installer upgraded to run ant scripts in the binary packages it
> >> >>installs.
> >> >> - Dev builds are now hidden by default. To see dev builds,
> >>right-click
> >> >> and choose
> >> >> "Show Dev Builds"
> >> >> - You can enable a cache of downloads by right-clicking and
> >>configuring
> >> >> the cache
> >> >>
> >> >> The Apache Flex SDK 4.12.0 RC2 is configured to use ant scripts for
> >> >> installation.
> >> >> You can determine that the ant script is running because the order of
> >> >>the
> >> >> options
> >> >> has the font libraries last (otherwise the remoting option is last).
> >> >>The
> >> >> installer
> >> >> should also be able to install the Nightly for FlexJS. If you want
> >>to
> >> >>try
> >> >> installing
> >> >> a nightly for Falcon or FalconJX, please choose an existing Flex SDK
> >> >> folder.
> >> >>
> >> >> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/
> >> >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/>
> >> >>
> >> >> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
> >>platforms,
> >> >> available here:
> >> >>
> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/binaries
> >> >>
> >><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/binaries
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version.
> >> >>
> >> >> Before voting please review the sections:
> >> >> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at
> >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at
> >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >> >>
> >> >> Vote
> >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >> >>
> >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Alex
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Carlos Rovira
> >> >Director de Tecnología
> >> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >> >F: +34 912 94 80 80
> >> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >> >http://www.directwriter.es
> >> >http://www.avant2.es
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> Director de Tecnología
> >> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >> F: +34 912 94 80 80
> >> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >> http://www.directwriter.es
> >> http://www.avant2.es
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Carlos Rovira
> >Director de Tecnología
> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >F: +34 912 94 80 80
> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >http://www.directwriter.es
> >http://www.avant2.es
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F: +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es
Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
Installer 3.0 - RC2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Nice! So what kinds of things are needed to make it "public ready"?
Changes to the FlexJS packaging or changes to IntelliJ or both?
-Alex
On 2/26/14 3:20 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <ca...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>here's the link to the image:
>
>http://i2.wp.com/www.madeinflex.com/wp-content/uploads/rtMedia/users/5/201
>4/02/flexjs_intellij_basics_setup.png
>
>I think we'll need improve the IDE support over time since my set up is
>tied to the build.xml and build_example.xml location and all the env vars.
>Right now this setup will speed up people working in this group since it
>throw editor errors when typing and other commodities.
>
>regarding your question, I created a Flash project and select the Apache
>FlexJS SDK from the installer. As I say I choose the location to reside
>inside "examples" folder and add the 3 SWCs in libs as global libraries.
>This is not "public ready" but as I said a great step forward to get
>something less tied to system variables and specific folder setup
>requirements in the actual FlexJS SDK examples folder. So intellij users
>with could get interested in this setup to try FlexJS and starting playing
>with it ;)
>
>
>
>
>2014-02-26 23:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
>
>> Hi Carlos.
>>
>> That's good news. The image didn't come through to my email though.
>>
>> I'm not worried about stripping things out for IntelliJ that FB
>>required.
>> We'll have to keep them around to keep FB happy. As long as IntelliJ
>> thought the FlexJS folder was a valid SDK that's great!
>>
>> Do you think FlexJS users are going to be satisfied with having to
>>setup a
>> build.xml for their projects? That's the main reason we did launch
>>configs
>> for FB, so users could just create new FB projects and compile them
>>without
>> having to mess with Ant.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> From: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com<mailto:
>> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>>
>> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <
>> dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>>
>> Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:41 PM
>> To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>"
>><dev@flex.apache.org
>> <ma...@flex.apache.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
>> Installer 3.0 - RC2)
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> in IntelliJ things seems more easy since I really doesn't need the
>>launch
>> configs like the ones in FB. For example, I add the build.xml file and
>> running it from the IDE is sufficient for me then I test it in a
>>browser. I
>> think IntelliJ needs a valid Flex SDK, but don't know if in this IDE we
>> already can remove some legacy things that are needed in FB. If you
>>share a
>> list off things I could remove I could test it and report results.
>>
>> There's some strange things: For example, the project builds
>>successfully
>> but at the end of the log it reports "fail"...don't know why right now
>> since all it's ok.
>>
>> Btw, I'm trying to create a typical TODO List sample to get more
>>familiar
>> with the framework (I already commit the initial example classes), and I
>> think I'll make a separate thread to ask some related things about
>>FlexJS
>> internals.
>>
>> I attach an image so you can see the final result (very promising, isn't
>> it? :)).[Imágenes integradas 1]
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-26 23:04 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com>>:
>> It will be great to find out what IntelliJ's assumptions about a Flex
>>SDK
>> are. For FB, the main issue was the introduction of new compiler
>>options
>> like mxml.children-as-data.
>> FB couldn't accept them in flex-config.xml because we're still using
>>MXMLC
>> and ASC2.0 to compile the code so for FB we have these eclipse launch
>> configurations that you run in order to compile and/or cross-compile the
>> code. The installer creates these launch configs. Maybe we'll have to
>> create a set for IntelliJ as well.
>>
>> Someday we'll feel confident enough to not ship MXMLC in a FlexJS
>>release
>> at all and rely on Falcon and then we may be able to get rid of the
>>launch
>> config requirement.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 2/26/14 10:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com
>> <ma...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote:
>>
>> >+1
>> >
>> >Note: I finally get it working updating my /etc/launchd.conf to point
>> >JAVA_HOME to java7
>> >I think this should be referenced for mac installations
>> >(my next step is try FlexJS sdk with IntelliJ IDEA for initial basic
>>use)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >2014-02-26 18:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com>>:
>> >
>> >> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.0 to be
>> >> released.
>> >>
>> >> Issues addressed in this release:
>> >> - Installer upgraded to run ant scripts in the binary packages it
>> >>installs.
>> >> - Dev builds are now hidden by default. To see dev builds,
>>right-click
>> >> and choose
>> >> "Show Dev Builds"
>> >> - You can enable a cache of downloads by right-clicking and
>>configuring
>> >> the cache
>> >>
>> >> The Apache Flex SDK 4.12.0 RC2 is configured to use ant scripts for
>> >> installation.
>> >> You can determine that the ant script is running because the order of
>> >>the
>> >> options
>> >> has the font libraries last (otherwise the remoting option is last).
>> >>The
>> >> installer
>> >> should also be able to install the Nightly for FlexJS. If you want
>>to
>> >>try
>> >> installing
>> >> a nightly for Falcon or FalconJX, please choose an existing Flex SDK
>> >> folder.
>> >>
>> >> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/
>> >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/>
>> >>
>> >> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
>>platforms,
>> >> available here:
>> >>
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/binaries
>> >>
>><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/binaries
>> >
>> >>
>> >> As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version.
>> >>
>> >> Before voting please review the sections:
>> >> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at
>> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at
>> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> >>
>> >> Vote
>> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >>
>> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Carlos Rovira
>> >Director de Tecnología
>> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
>> >F: +34 912 94 80 80
>> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> >http://www.directwriter.es
>> >http://www.avant2.es
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> Director de Tecnología
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>> F: +34 912 94 80 80
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> http://www.directwriter.es
>> http://www.avant2.es
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Carlos Rovira
>Director de Tecnología
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>F: +34 912 94 80 80
>http://www.codeoscopic.com
>http://www.directwriter.es
>http://www.avant2.es
Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
Installer 3.0 - RC2)
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Alex,
here's the link to the image:
http://i2.wp.com/www.madeinflex.com/wp-content/uploads/rtMedia/users/5/2014/02/flexjs_intellij_basics_setup.png
I think we'll need improve the IDE support over time since my set up is
tied to the build.xml and build_example.xml location and all the env vars.
Right now this setup will speed up people working in this group since it
throw editor errors when typing and other commodities.
regarding your question, I created a Flash project and select the Apache
FlexJS SDK from the installer. As I say I choose the location to reside
inside "examples" folder and add the 3 SWCs in libs as global libraries.
This is not "public ready" but as I said a great step forward to get
something less tied to system variables and specific folder setup
requirements in the actual FlexJS SDK examples folder. So intellij users
with could get interested in this setup to try FlexJS and starting playing
with it ;)
2014-02-26 23:48 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> Hi Carlos.
>
> That's good news. The image didn't come through to my email though.
>
> I'm not worried about stripping things out for IntelliJ that FB required.
> We'll have to keep them around to keep FB happy. As long as IntelliJ
> thought the FlexJS folder was a valid SDK that's great!
>
> Do you think FlexJS users are going to be satisfied with having to setup a
> build.xml for their projects? That's the main reason we did launch configs
> for FB, so users could just create new FB projects and compile them without
> having to mess with Ant.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> From: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com<mailto:
> carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>>
> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <
> dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>>
> Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:41 PM
> To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <dev@flex.apache.org
> <ma...@flex.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
> Installer 3.0 - RC2)
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> in IntelliJ things seems more easy since I really doesn't need the launch
> configs like the ones in FB. For example, I add the build.xml file and
> running it from the IDE is sufficient for me then I test it in a browser. I
> think IntelliJ needs a valid Flex SDK, but don't know if in this IDE we
> already can remove some legacy things that are needed in FB. If you share a
> list off things I could remove I could test it and report results.
>
> There's some strange things: For example, the project builds successfully
> but at the end of the log it reports "fail"...don't know why right now
> since all it's ok.
>
> Btw, I'm trying to create a typical TODO List sample to get more familiar
> with the framework (I already commit the initial example classes), and I
> think I'll make a separate thread to ask some related things about FlexJS
> internals.
>
> I attach an image so you can see the final result (very promising, isn't
> it? :)).[Imágenes integradas 1]
>
>
> 2014-02-26 23:04 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>>:
> It will be great to find out what IntelliJ's assumptions about a Flex SDK
> are. For FB, the main issue was the introduction of new compiler options
> like mxml.children-as-data.
> FB couldn't accept them in flex-config.xml because we're still using MXMLC
> and ASC2.0 to compile the code so for FB we have these eclipse launch
> configurations that you run in order to compile and/or cross-compile the
> code. The installer creates these launch configs. Maybe we'll have to
> create a set for IntelliJ as well.
>
> Someday we'll feel confident enough to not ship MXMLC in a FlexJS release
> at all and rely on Falcon and then we may be able to get rid of the launch
> config requirement.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 2/26/14 10:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com
> <ma...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >Note: I finally get it working updating my /etc/launchd.conf to point
> >JAVA_HOME to java7
> >I think this should be referenced for mac installations
> >(my next step is try FlexJS sdk with IntelliJ IDEA for initial basic use)
> >
> >
> >
> >2014-02-26 18:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>>:
> >
> >> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.0 to be
> >> released.
> >>
> >> Issues addressed in this release:
> >> - Installer upgraded to run ant scripts in the binary packages it
> >>installs.
> >> - Dev builds are now hidden by default. To see dev builds, right-click
> >> and choose
> >> "Show Dev Builds"
> >> - You can enable a cache of downloads by right-clicking and configuring
> >> the cache
> >>
> >> The Apache Flex SDK 4.12.0 RC2 is configured to use ant scripts for
> >> installation.
> >> You can determine that the ant script is running because the order of
> >>the
> >> options
> >> has the font libraries last (otherwise the remoting option is last).
> >>The
> >> installer
> >> should also be able to install the Nightly for FlexJS. If you want to
> >>try
> >> installing
> >> a nightly for Falcon or FalconJX, please choose an existing Flex SDK
> >> folder.
> >>
> >> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/
> >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/>
> >>
> >> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> >> available here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/binaries
> >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/binaries
> >
> >>
> >> As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version.
> >>
> >> Before voting please review the sections:
> >> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >>
> >> Vote
> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Carlos Rovira
> >Director de Tecnología
> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >F: +34 912 94 80 80
> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >http://www.directwriter.es
> >http://www.avant2.es
>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Director de Tecnología
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> F: +34 912 94 80 80
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> http://www.directwriter.es
> http://www.avant2.es
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F: +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es
Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
Installer 3.0 - RC2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Hi Carlos.
That's good news. The image didn't come through to my email though.
I'm not worried about stripping things out for IntelliJ that FB required. We'll have to keep them around to keep FB happy. As long as IntelliJ thought the FlexJS folder was a valid SDK that's great!
Do you think FlexJS users are going to be satisfied with having to setup a build.xml for their projects? That's the main reason we did launch configs for FB, so users could just create new FB projects and compile them without having to mess with Ant.
Thanks,
-Alex
From: Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <de...@flex.apache.org>>
Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:41 PM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org<ma...@flex.apache.org>" <de...@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC2)
Hi Alex,
in IntelliJ things seems more easy since I really doesn't need the launch configs like the ones in FB. For example, I add the build.xml file and running it from the IDE is sufficient for me then I test it in a browser. I think IntelliJ needs a valid Flex SDK, but don't know if in this IDE we already can remove some legacy things that are needed in FB. If you share a list off things I could remove I could test it and report results.
There's some strange things: For example, the project builds successfully but at the end of the log it reports "fail"...don't know why right now since all it's ok.
Btw, I'm trying to create a typical TODO List sample to get more familiar with the framework (I already commit the initial example classes), and I think I'll make a separate thread to ask some related things about FlexJS internals.
I attach an image so you can see the final result (very promising, isn't it? :)).[Imágenes integradas 1]
2014-02-26 23:04 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>:
It will be great to find out what IntelliJ's assumptions about a Flex SDK
are. For FB, the main issue was the introduction of new compiler options
like mxml.children-as-data.
FB couldn't accept them in flex-config.xml because we're still using MXMLC
and ASC2.0 to compile the code so for FB we have these eclipse launch
configurations that you run in order to compile and/or cross-compile the
code. The installer creates these launch configs. Maybe we'll have to
create a set for IntelliJ as well.
Someday we'll feel confident enough to not ship MXMLC in a FlexJS release
at all and rely on Falcon and then we may be able to get rid of the launch
config requirement.
-Alex
On 2/26/14 10:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <ca...@codeoscopic.com>> wrote:
>+1
>
>Note: I finally get it working updating my /etc/launchd.conf to point
>JAVA_HOME to java7
>I think this should be referenced for mac installations
>(my next step is try FlexJS sdk with IntelliJ IDEA for initial basic use)
>
>
>
>2014-02-26 18:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>:
>
>> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.0 to be
>> released.
>>
>> Issues addressed in this release:
>> - Installer upgraded to run ant scripts in the binary packages it
>>installs.
>> - Dev builds are now hidden by default. To see dev builds, right-click
>> and choose
>> "Show Dev Builds"
>> - You can enable a cache of downloads by right-clicking and configuring
>> the cache
>>
>> The Apache Flex SDK 4.12.0 RC2 is configured to use ant scripts for
>> installation.
>> You can determine that the ant script is running because the order of
>>the
>> options
>> has the font libraries last (otherwise the remoting option is last).
>>The
>> installer
>> should also be able to install the Nightly for FlexJS. If you want to
>>try
>> installing
>> a nightly for Falcon or FalconJX, please choose an existing Flex SDK
>> folder.
>>
>> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/
>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/>
>>
>> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
>> available here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/binaries
>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/binaries>
>>
>> As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version.
>>
>> Before voting please review the sections:
>> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>
>> Vote
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Carlos Rovira
>Director de Tecnología
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>F: +34 912 94 80 80
>http://www.codeoscopic.com
>http://www.directwriter.es
>http://www.avant2.es
--
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F: +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es
Re: [FLEXJS] Intellij (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK
Installer 3.0 - RC2)
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@codeoscopic.com>.
Hi Alex,
in IntelliJ things seems more easy since I really doesn't need the launch
configs like the ones in FB. For example, I add the build.xml file and
running it from the IDE is sufficient for me then I test it in a browser. I
think IntelliJ needs a valid Flex SDK, but don't know if in this IDE we
already can remove some legacy things that are needed in FB. If you share a
list off things I could remove I could test it and report results.
There's some strange things: For example, the project builds successfully
but at the end of the log it reports "fail"...don't know why right now
since all it's ok.
Btw, I'm trying to create a typical TODO List sample to get more familiar
with the framework (I already commit the initial example classes), and I
think I'll make a separate thread to ask some related things about FlexJS
internals.
I attach an image so you can see the final result (very promising, isn't
it? :)).[image: Imágenes integradas 1]
2014-02-26 23:04 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> It will be great to find out what IntelliJ's assumptions about a Flex SDK
> are. For FB, the main issue was the introduction of new compiler options
> like mxml.children-as-data.
> FB couldn't accept them in flex-config.xml because we're still using MXMLC
> and ASC2.0 to compile the code so for FB we have these eclipse launch
> configurations that you run in order to compile and/or cross-compile the
> code. The installer creates these launch configs. Maybe we'll have to
> create a set for IntelliJ as well.
>
> Someday we'll feel confident enough to not ship MXMLC in a FlexJS release
> at all and rely on Falcon and then we may be able to get rid of the launch
> config requirement.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 2/26/14 10:18 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <ca...@codeoscopic.com>
> wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >Note: I finally get it working updating my /etc/launchd.conf to point
> >JAVA_HOME to java7
> >I think this should be referenced for mac installations
> >(my next step is try FlexJS sdk with IntelliJ IDEA for initial basic use)
> >
> >
> >
> >2014-02-26 18:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>:
> >
> >> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.0 to be
> >> released.
> >>
> >> Issues addressed in this release:
> >> - Installer upgraded to run ant scripts in the binary packages it
> >>installs.
> >> - Dev builds are now hidden by default. To see dev builds, right-click
> >> and choose
> >> "Show Dev Builds"
> >> - You can enable a cache of downloads by right-clicking and configuring
> >> the cache
> >>
> >> The Apache Flex SDK 4.12.0 RC2 is configured to use ant scripts for
> >> installation.
> >> You can determine that the ant script is running because the order of
> >>the
> >> options
> >> has the font libraries last (otherwise the remoting option is last).
> >>The
> >> installer
> >> should also be able to install the Nightly for FlexJS. If you want to
> >>try
> >> installing
> >> a nightly for Falcon or FalconJX, please choose an existing Flex SDK
> >> folder.
> >>
> >> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/
> >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/>
> >>
> >> The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms,
> >> available here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc2/binaries
> >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.0/rc1/binaries
> >
> >>
> >> As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version.
> >>
> >> Before voting please review the sections:
> >> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >>
> >> Vote
> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >Carlos Rovira
> >Director de Tecnología
> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
> >F: +34 912 94 80 80
> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >http://www.directwriter.es
> >http://www.avant2.es
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F: +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es