You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Sander Temme <sa...@temme.net> on 2007/04/26 23:52:19 UTC

Releases around ApacheCon EU?

Community,

As ApacheCon draws near, perhaps we should plan some httpd releases  
during the week?  Between beer and bitterballen there must be time to  
bat some patches around(1).  Going in with the intention of, say, a  
T&R on Wednesday after the Tuesday Hackathon should get us in the  
right frame of mind to get something out by the end of the week.

I'd like to try my hand at the T&R process so if no one objects I  
volunteer to play RM.

--> 1.3.x, any patches that justify a release?

--> 2.0.x There are some backports in need of votes.  There seems to  
be only one patch to APR 0.9.x since the last release, do we need one?

--> 2.2.x IIRC the initial intent was to roll 2.2.5 fairly quickly  
after 2.2.4, but that never happened.  Many changes to APR 1.2.x,  
we'll likely need a new release of that.

Thoughts?

S.

-- 
sander@temme.net              http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF


Re: Releases around ApacheCon EU?

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Sander Temme wrote:
> Community,
> 
> As ApacheCon draws near, perhaps we should plan some httpd releases
> during the week?  Between beer and bitterballen there must be time to
> bat some patches around(1).  Going in with the intention of, say, a T&R
> on Wednesday after the Tuesday Hackathon should get us in the right
> frame of mind to get something out by the end of the week.
> 
> I'd like to try my hand at the T&R process so if no one objects I
> volunteer to play RM.

+ 1!

> --> 1.3.x, any patches that justify a release?

Dunno - will look, a bit of low hanging fruit that should be easy to get
committed.  Bugfix only stuff.

> --> 2.0.x There are some backports in need of votes.  There seems to be
> only one patch to APR 0.9.x since the last release, do we need one?

Yes, must have an APR - two new bugs.  One is that Jeff's patch many moons
ago to change pipe log processes to command processors had broken win32 in
service mode (we've chattered about this, I'm working on a fix within apr
instead of within httpd), and second the fix already in apr 0.9 branch
which solves client ip resolution with acceptex.

> --> 2.2.x IIRC the initial intent was to roll 2.2.5 fairly quickly after
> 2.2.4, but that never happened.  Many changes to APR 1.2.x, we'll likely
> need a new release of that.

Agreed.

Bill


Re: Releases around ApacheCon EU?

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Sander Temme wrote:
> 
> --> 2.2.x IIRC the initial intent was to roll 2.2.5 fairly quickly after
> 2.2.4, but that never happened.  

you proposed or committed many extra/*.conf changes to solve win32 path
issues (essentially, quoting arguments etc).  Need to just ensure that
the finished result is good to go.

Re: Releases around ApacheCon EU?

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Apr 26, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Sander Temme wrote:

> Community,
>
> As ApacheCon draws near, perhaps we should plan some httpd releases  
> during the week?  Between beer and bitterballen there must be time  
> to bat some patches around(1).  Going in with the intention of,  
> say, a T&R on Wednesday after the Tuesday Hackathon should get us  
> in the right frame of mind to get something out by the end of the  
> week.
>
> I'd like to try my hand at the T&R process so if no one objects I  
> volunteer to play RM.
>
> --> 1.3.x, any patches that justify a release?
>
> --> 2.0.x There are some backports in need of votes.  There seems  
> to be only one patch to APR 0.9.x since the last release, do we  
> need one?
>
> --> 2.2.x IIRC the initial intent was to roll 2.2.5 fairly quickly  
> after 2.2.4, but that never happened.  Many changes to APR 1.2.x,  
> we'll likely need a new release of that.
>

I think this is a good idea... have people review STATUS and start  
voting.
Yeah, my hope was to get a 2.2.5 out semi-quickly, I think with the
various proxy changes, it's time, but I was holding off because there
are quite a few backports missing just 1 vote.