You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com> on 2009/02/19 17:21:00 UTC
is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Hi all,
Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where the site
is being deployed to?
Cheers
Chico
Re: is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Chico
2009/2/20, chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com>:
> Regarding the doc space, I don't know, how do other apache projects manage
> this?
Generally, ASF projects use Maven, Confluence, Forrest, Velocity...
Very rarely pure HTML pages. The main idea is to have a central place
for the doc (the main site) with the official doc and some pointers to
unofficial docs.
Cheers,
Vincent
FYI "The Committers on a project are expected to collectively maintain
the project's web site."
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#committer-responsibilities
Re: is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Posted by chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com>.
I like the notification idea, vincent, and by setting the threshold to high
on that profile, I presume notifications would only occur for bugs that are
likely to be 'real' issues.
I still do think it would be useful to have the site deployed through
hudson, so people can access the QA reports at any given time.
Regarding the doc space, I don't know, how do other apache projects manage
this?
Cheers,
Chico
2009/2/20 Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>
> Hi Chico,
>
> mmmh an automated deployment for the site seems to be a good idea at
> the first read but... few developers looks at Hudson *regularly* so I
> guess it should be the same for the automated site.
>
> The site actually contains the project info reports and if running
> with reporting profile, it will contain Javadocs and some QA reports.
> So site is useful only for QA reports.
>
> Instead of automated deployment, we could create a QA profile with
> failOnError = true for wanted QA plugins. If we have a notifications @
> for Hudson, we could receive QA errors then devs could have a glance
> on pb.
>
> Also, IMHO we will lost the user with this new doc space in addition
> to the official website (not really up to date) and 2 wikis.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
> 2009/2/20, chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com>:
> > I think it would be really useful to get this up n running in an
> automated
> > fashion ..
> >
> > I ran findbugs (through the eclipse plug-in) and it found a few things
> w/
> > each of the modules. For example, the following HTTP splitting
> vulnerability
> > was found on line 64 of ConcatProxyServlet in the gadgets module:
> > - "This code directly writes an HTTP parameter to an HTTP header, which
> > allows for a HTTP response splitting vulnerability. See
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_response_splitting for more
> information."
> >
> > I'm not an expert on HTTP vulnerabilities, but I like the fact that
> findbugs
> > highlighted this ..
> >
> > I think it would be useful to have the shindig site deployed as part of
> the
> > automated build process, so that the community has visibility to these
> > 'potential' issues. And other great features like code coverage and the
> TODO
> > tag list also warrants having this :)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Chico
> >
> > 2009/2/19 Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>
> >
> > > I have been deploying it at http://people.apache.org/~ieb/shindig<http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig>
> >
> > >
> > > but I have done this manually since I couldn't get cron to work on
> people
> > > (probably because I should not be using it :))
> > >
> > > It would be nice to have a hudson job to do it, but I am not certain
> how it
> > > would deploy from there.
> > > Ian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 19 Feb 2009, at 16:21, chico charlesworth wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where
> the
> > >> site
> > >> is being deployed to?
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Chico
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Chico,
mmmh an automated deployment for the site seems to be a good idea at
the first read but... few developers looks at Hudson *regularly* so I
guess it should be the same for the automated site.
The site actually contains the project info reports and if running
with reporting profile, it will contain Javadocs and some QA reports.
So site is useful only for QA reports.
Instead of automated deployment, we could create a QA profile with
failOnError = true for wanted QA plugins. If we have a notifications @
for Hudson, we could receive QA errors then devs could have a glance
on pb.
Also, IMHO we will lost the user with this new doc space in addition
to the official website (not really up to date) and 2 wikis.
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/2/20, chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com>:
> I think it would be really useful to get this up n running in an automated
> fashion ..
>
> I ran findbugs (through the eclipse plug-in) and it found a few things w/
> each of the modules. For example, the following HTTP splitting vulnerability
> was found on line 64 of ConcatProxyServlet in the gadgets module:
> - "This code directly writes an HTTP parameter to an HTTP header, which
> allows for a HTTP response splitting vulnerability. See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_response_splitting for more information."
>
> I'm not an expert on HTTP vulnerabilities, but I like the fact that findbugs
> highlighted this ..
>
> I think it would be useful to have the shindig site deployed as part of the
> automated build process, so that the community has visibility to these
> 'potential' issues. And other great features like code coverage and the TODO
> tag list also warrants having this :)
>
> Cheers
> Chico
>
> 2009/2/19 Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>
>
> > I have been deploying it at http://people.apache.org/~ieb/shindig<http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig>
>
> >
> > but I have done this manually since I couldn't get cron to work on people
> > (probably because I should not be using it :))
> >
> > It would be nice to have a hudson job to do it, but I am not certain how it
> > would deploy from there.
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> > On 19 Feb 2009, at 16:21, chico charlesworth wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >>
> >> Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where the
> >> site
> >> is being deployed to?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Chico
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Posted by chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com>.
gr8 stuff ian :)
2009/2/20 Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>
> Agreed,
>
> I will have a look into creating a hudson job.
>
> I will also turn on findbugs and code coverage resports on the main hudson
> job.
> Ian
>
> On 20 Feb 2009, at 08:41, chico charlesworth wrote:
>
> I think it would be really useful to get this up n running in an automated
>> fashion ..
>>
>> I ran findbugs (through the eclipse plug-in) and it found a few things w/
>> each of the modules. For example, the following HTTP splitting
>> vulnerability
>> was found on line 64 of ConcatProxyServlet in the gadgets module:
>> - "This code directly writes an HTTP parameter to an HTTP header, which
>> allows for a HTTP response splitting vulnerability. See
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_response_splitting for more
>> information."
>>
>> I'm not an expert on HTTP vulnerabilities, but I like the fact that
>> findbugs
>> highlighted this ..
>>
>> I think it would be useful to have the shindig site deployed as part of
>> the
>> automated build process, so that the community has visibility to these
>> 'potential' issues. And other great features like code coverage and the
>> TODO
>> tag list also warrants having this :)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Chico
>>
>> 2009/2/19 Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>
>>
>> I have been deploying it at http://people.apache.org/~ieb/shindig<http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig>
>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig>
>>>
>>> but I have done this manually since I couldn't get cron to work on people
>>> (probably because I should not be using it :))
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have a hudson job to do it, but I am not certain how
>>> it
>>> would deploy from there.
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19 Feb 2009, at 16:21, chico charlesworth wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where the
>>>> site
>>>> is being deployed to?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Chico
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
Agreed,
I will have a look into creating a hudson job.
I will also turn on findbugs and code coverage resports on the main
hudson job.
Ian
On 20 Feb 2009, at 08:41, chico charlesworth wrote:
> I think it would be really useful to get this up n running in an
> automated
> fashion ..
>
> I ran findbugs (through the eclipse plug-in) and it found a few
> things w/
> each of the modules. For example, the following HTTP splitting
> vulnerability
> was found on line 64 of ConcatProxyServlet in the gadgets module:
> - "This code directly writes an HTTP parameter to an HTTP header,
> which
> allows for a HTTP response splitting vulnerability. See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_response_splitting for more
> information."
>
> I'm not an expert on HTTP vulnerabilities, but I like the fact that
> findbugs
> highlighted this ..
>
> I think it would be useful to have the shindig site deployed as part
> of the
> automated build process, so that the community has visibility to these
> 'potential' issues. And other great features like code coverage and
> the TODO
> tag list also warrants having this :)
>
> Cheers
> Chico
>
> 2009/2/19 Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>
>
>> I have been deploying it at http://people.apache.org/~ieb/shindig<http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig
>> >
>>
>> but I have done this manually since I couldn't get cron to work on
>> people
>> (probably because I should not be using it :))
>>
>> It would be nice to have a hudson job to do it, but I am not
>> certain how it
>> would deploy from there.
>> Ian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19 Feb 2009, at 16:21, chico charlesworth wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where
>>> the
>>> site
>>> is being deployed to?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Chico
>>>
>>
>>
Re: is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Posted by chico charlesworth <ch...@googlemail.com>.
I think it would be really useful to get this up n running in an automated
fashion ..
I ran findbugs (through the eclipse plug-in) and it found a few things w/
each of the modules. For example, the following HTTP splitting vulnerability
was found on line 64 of ConcatProxyServlet in the gadgets module:
- "This code directly writes an HTTP parameter to an HTTP header, which
allows for a HTTP response splitting vulnerability. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_response_splitting for more information."
I'm not an expert on HTTP vulnerabilities, but I like the fact that findbugs
highlighted this ..
I think it would be useful to have the shindig site deployed as part of the
automated build process, so that the community has visibility to these
'potential' issues. And other great features like code coverage and the TODO
tag list also warrants having this :)
Cheers
Chico
2009/2/19 Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>
> I have been deploying it at http://people.apache.org/~ieb/shindig<http://people.apache.org/%7Eieb/shindig>
>
> but I have done this manually since I couldn't get cron to work on people
> (probably because I should not be using it :))
>
> It would be nice to have a hudson job to do it, but I am not certain how it
> would deploy from there.
> Ian
>
>
>
> On 19 Feb 2009, at 16:21, chico charlesworth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where the
>> site
>> is being deployed to?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Chico
>>
>
>
Re: is 'mvn site' being deployed somewhere?
Posted by Ian Boston <ie...@tfd.co.uk>.
I have been deploying it at http://people.apache.org/~ieb/shindig
but I have done this manually since I couldn't get cron to work on
people (probably because I should not be using it :))
It would be nice to have a hudson job to do it, but I am not certain
how it would deploy from there.
Ian
On 19 Feb 2009, at 16:21, chico charlesworth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is 'mvn site' being run for shindig? If so, does anyone know where
> the site
> is being deployed to?
>
> Cheers
> Chico