Re: JXTemplate backport

[Daniel Fagerstrom <da...@nada.kth.se>]

Reinhard Poetz wrote:

> Messing, Elad wrote:
>
>> Thank you Reinhard ! Words perfect now :)
>>
>> Is it documented somewhere  ? Should I expect a change soon, so that 
>> I will have to change everything back to coccon.session.blah ? 
>
> don't know what the plans are, but we should be able to backport the 
> template block to Cocoon 2.1 so that people have the choice to use 
> either the "old" or the refactored version of jx-template 
> generator/transformer.

+0,

If someone feel like doing it, there should IIRC not be any technical 
problems doing it. There might be some Java 1.4 dependencies, don't 
remember.

/Daniel

Re: JXTemplate backport

[Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>]

Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> 
>> Messing, Elad wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Reinhard ! Words perfect now :)
>>>
>>> Is it documented somewhere  ? Should I expect a change soon, so that 
>>> I will have to change everything back to coccon.session.blah ? 
>>
>>
>> don't know what the plans are, but we should be able to backport the 
>> template block to Cocoon 2.1 so that people have the choice to use 
>> either the "old" or the refactored version of jx-template 
>> generator/transformer.
> 
> 
> +0,
> 
> If someone feel like doing it, there should IIRC not be any technical 
> problems doing it. There might be some Java 1.4 dependencies, don't 
> remember.

+0 too (don't have this itch to scratch ATM)  ;-)

-- 
Reinhard Pötz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                        web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------