[GitHub] [tvm-rfcs] tqchen commented on pull request #77: [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

tqchen commented on PR #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/77#issuecomment-1180606480

   following up on this, I think we are in broad stroke agreement that we can achieve our goals with blocl/fn attributes in IR as well as builtin assume. As a result, my original blocker for the RFC has been resolved, would still be great to work together to flesh out the details of schedule primitives and how do they interact with the rest of TIR scheduling, but I somewhat think they can be done separately and we don;t need to nail down the details of primitives.
   
   The schedule primitives can be done relatively independently as long as we agree on the principle that:
   - Transformations do not change the function interface behavior
   - We decouple the graph level decisions into two steps: local decision + rewrite
   
   We can explore possible options as long as the IR spec remains stable, if there is a need to update IR itself or meaning of attribute, we can come back and discuss again


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@tvm.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org