You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by Sutou Kouhei <ko...@apache.org> on 2023/05/09 00:59:35 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE][Format][Flight] Ordered data support
Hi,
The vote carries with 4 +1 binding votes, 1 +1 non-binding
vote and no -1 votes.
I'll merge https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35178 .
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20...@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE][Format][Flight] Ordered data support" on Thu, 04 May 2023 16:25:43 +0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei <ko...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose ordered data support for Flight RPC.
>
> See the following pull request and discussion for details:
>
> * GH-34852: [C++][Go][Java][FlightRPC] Add support for ordered data
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35178
>
> Preview: http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/35178/format/Flight.html
>
> * [DISCUSS][Format][Flight] Ordered data support
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0q1s84p17rtdz3q81wvylckob1hsx83z
>
> This is based on one of the following proposals:
>
> [DISCUSS] Flight RPC/Flight SQL/ADBC enhancements
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/247z3t06mf132nocngc1jkp3oqglz7jp
>
> Google Docs: (Arrow ML) Arrow Flight RPC/Flight SQL Proposals
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jhPyPZSOo2iy0LqIJVUs9KWPyFULVFJXTILDfkadx2g/edit#heading=h.h2ein4otvhtq
>
> Summary:
>
> * Before:
> There is no ordering defined on endpoints or the data
> within.
>
> After:
> FlightInfo.ordered is added. If FlightInfo.ordered is
> true, this signals there is some order between data from
> different endpoints.
>
> * Motivation: We can optimize a sorted results case by
> FlightInfo.ordered. A client needs to sort by itself even
> when a Flight RPC system returns sorted results without
> FlightInfo.ordered. Because a client can't know whether
> results are sorted or not.
>
> * This proposal does NOT break a backward
> compatibility. Because clients can ignore
> FlightInfo.ordered.
>
> * The pull request includes reference implementations for
> C++, Go and Java.
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou