You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/02/12 15:02:01 UTC

[jira] Commented: (JCR-1944) Privilege content representation should be of property type NAME

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12672976#action_12672976 ] 

angela commented on JCR-1944:
-----------------------------

> I don't think we should merge this to 1.5

no, rather not.

> BTW, do you think this should be noted in the 1.6 release notes for 
> people who are already trying out the new security code? I'm not sure 
> how big an impact the changed property type will cause.

big. that's why i scheduled it for 2.0.0.

but after all the 283 implementation is still work in progress and Issue #JCR-1588 has not been closed up to now. unless the spec is finalized there may be any kind of changes that break backwards compability.

listing in in the release notes may still be a good idea.

> Privilege content representation should be of property type NAME
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1944
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1944
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-core, security
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: angela
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> the content representation of jcr privileges should reflect that fact that privilege names changed from simple string to JCR name.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.