You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@harmony.apache.org by "Andrew Cornwall (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/03/26 19:03:29 UTC

[jira] Created: (HARMONY-5655) [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec

[classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec
------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: HARMONY-5655
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655
             Project: Harmony
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Classlib
         Environment: all pack200
            Reporter: Andrew Cornwall


Right now, the class pool is output in a different order than the spec specifies. This causes verify errors on large classes, since some classes refer to class pool elements which are <256 in the spec but are >256 in the Harmony unpack.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-5655) [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec

Posted by "Sian January (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sian January resolved HARMONY-5655.
-----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 5.0M6

Patch applied at r641847.  Please check that it was applied as you expected.

> [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-5655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>         Environment: all pack200
>            Reporter: Andrew Cornwall
>            Assignee: Sian January
>             Fix For: 5.0M6
>
>         Attachments: main.patch
>
>
> Right now, the class pool is output in a different order than the spec specifies. This causes verify errors on large classes, since some classes refer to class pool elements which are <256 in the spec but are >256 in the Harmony unpack.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Closed: (HARMONY-5655) [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec

Posted by "Andrew Cornwall (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Cornwall closed HARMONY-5655.
------------------------------------


Fix was applied as expected. Thanks!

> [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-5655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>         Environment: all pack200
>            Reporter: Andrew Cornwall
>            Assignee: Sian January
>             Fix For: 5.0M6
>
>         Attachments: main.patch
>
>
> Right now, the class pool is output in a different order than the spec specifies. This causes verify errors on large classes, since some classes refer to class pool elements which are <256 in the spec but are >256 in the Harmony unpack.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Assigned: (HARMONY-5655) [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec

Posted by "Sian January (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sian January reassigned HARMONY-5655:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: Sian January

> [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-5655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>         Environment: all pack200
>            Reporter: Andrew Cornwall
>            Assignee: Sian January
>         Attachments: main.patch
>
>
> Right now, the class pool is output in a different order than the spec specifies. This causes verify errors on large classes, since some classes refer to class pool elements which are <256 in the spec but are >256 in the Harmony unpack.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (HARMONY-5655) [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec

Posted by "Andrew Cornwall (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Cornwall updated HARMONY-5655:
-------------------------------------

    Attachment: main.patch

main.patch contains a patch to keep Strings which are referenced with the single-byte ldc instruction (bytecode 18) at the beginning of the class pool. 

> [classlib][pack200] Need to sort class pool per pack200 spec
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-5655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5655
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Classlib
>         Environment: all pack200
>            Reporter: Andrew Cornwall
>         Attachments: main.patch
>
>
> Right now, the class pool is output in a different order than the spec specifies. This causes verify errors on large classes, since some classes refer to class pool elements which are <256 in the spec but are >256 in the Harmony unpack.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.