You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org> on 2013/03/29 21:37:13 UTC
Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Hi Sqoop developers,
It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
I would love to hear others thoughts!
Jarcec
1: http://s.apache.org/jw
2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by abhijeet gaikwad <ab...@gmail.com>.
This is great!
+ 1
Thanks,
Abhijeet
On Apr 5, 2013 1:35 AM, "Venkat Ranganathan" <vr...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:
> Thanks everyone. It looks like there is agreement in giving me the
> opportunity to volunteer as a community RM for this release. It is a
> great opportunity for me to learn and contribute in this capacity and my
> thanks and appreciation for the same. With that thought, I accept this
> opportunity.
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
> On Mon Apr 1 14:55:56 2013, Kathleen Ting wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <wi...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jarcec,
>>>>
>>>> Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental
>>>> release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.
>>>>
>>>> +1 for community RM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hari
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Sqoop developers,
>>>>> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under
>>>>> version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the
>>>>> development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be
>>>>> resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features
>>>>> including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC
>>>>> Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type
>>>>> that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
>>>>>
>>>>> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the
>>>>> 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that
>>>>> was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step
>>>>> up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've
>>>>> step up to be the mentor.
>>>>>
>>>>> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one
>>>>> got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would
>>>>> be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this
>>>>> option to the broader community.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would love to hear others thoughts!
>>>>>
>>>>> Jarcec
>>>>>
>>>>> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
>>>>> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by vasanth kumar <rj...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thanks,
Vasanth kumar
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks everyone. Yes, Jarek, Please let me know the steps I should get
> started on.
> Hari, yes, I would definitely reach out if I need help.
> Thanks
> Venkat
>
>
> On Thu Apr 4 21:10:41 2013, Hari Shreedharan wrote:
>
>> Awesome. Venkat - if you need any help or info, feel free to ping me.
>>
>>
>> Hari
>>
>>
--
Regards
Vasanth kumar RJ
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks everyone. Yes, Jarek, Please let me know the steps I should
get started on.
Hari, yes, I would definitely reach out if I need help.
Thanks
Venkat
On Thu Apr 4 21:10:41 2013, Hari Shreedharan wrote:
> Awesome. Venkat - if you need any help or info, feel free to ping me.
>
>
> Hari
>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>.
Awesome. Venkat - if you need any help or info, feel free to ping me.
Hari
--
Hari Shreedharan
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
> thank you very much for stepping out. I greatly appreciate that you've volunteer to be the release mentor and I'm looking forward to collaborate with you on the release. Let's get started!
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:05:00PM -0700, Venkat Ranganathan wrote:
> > Thanks everyone. It looks like there is agreement in giving me the
> > opportunity to volunteer as a community RM for this release. It is
> > a great opportunity for me to learn and contribute in this capacity
> > and my thanks and appreciation for the same. With that thought, I
> > accept this opportunity.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Venkat
> >
> > On Mon Apr 1 14:55:56 2013, Kathleen Ting wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <will@cloudera.com (mailto:will@cloudera.com)> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hshreedharan@cloudera.com (mailto:hshreedharan@cloudera.com)> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jarcec,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for community RM.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Hari
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Hari Shreedharan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Sqoop developers,
> > > > > > It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would love to hear others thoughts!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jarcec
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
> > > > > > 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
Hi Venkat,
thank you very much for stepping out. I greatly appreciate that you've volunteer to be the release mentor and I'm looking forward to collaborate with you on the release. Let's get started!
Jarcec
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:05:00PM -0700, Venkat Ranganathan wrote:
> Thanks everyone. It looks like there is agreement in giving me the
> opportunity to volunteer as a community RM for this release. It is
> a great opportunity for me to learn and contribute in this capacity
> and my thanks and appreciation for the same. With that thought, I
> accept this opportunity.
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
> On Mon Apr 1 14:55:56 2013, Kathleen Ting wrote:
> >+1
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <wi...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>+1
> >>
> >>On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Jarcec,
> >>>
> >>>Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.
> >>>
> >>>+1 for community RM.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Hari
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Hari Shreedharan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Sqoop developers,
> >>>>It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
> >>>>
> >>>>That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
> >>>>
> >>>>During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
> >>>>
> >>>>I would love to hear others thoughts!
> >>>>
> >>>>Jarcec
> >>>>
> >>>>1: http://s.apache.org/jw
> >>>>2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
> >>>
> >>>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks everyone. It looks like there is agreement in giving me the
opportunity to volunteer as a community RM for this release. It is a
great opportunity for me to learn and contribute in this capacity and
my thanks and appreciation for the same. With that thought, I accept
this opportunity.
Thanks
Venkat
On Mon Apr 1 14:55:56 2013, Kathleen Ting wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <wi...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jarcec,
>>>
>>> Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.
>>>
>>> +1 for community RM.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sqoop developers,
>>>> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
>>>>
>>>> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
>>>>
>>>> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
>>>>
>>>> I would love to hear others thoughts!
>>>>
>>>> Jarcec
>>>>
>>>> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
>>>> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
>>>
>>>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Kathleen Ting <ka...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <wi...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jarcec,
>>
>> Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.
>>
>> +1 for community RM.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>> --
>> Hari Shreedharan
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sqoop developers,
>>> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
>>>
>>> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
>>>
>>> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
>>>
>>> I would love to hear others thoughts!
>>>
>>> Jarcec
>>>
>>> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
>>> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
>>
>>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Will McQueen <wi...@cloudera.com>.
+1
On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi Jarcec,
>
> Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.
>
> +1 for community RM.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
> --
> Hari Shreedharan
>
>
> On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
>
>> Hi Sqoop developers,
>> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
>>
>> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
>>
>> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
>>
>> I would love to hear others thoughts!
>>
>> Jarcec
>>
>> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
>> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
>
>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>.
Hi Jarcec,
Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.
+1 for community RM.
Thanks,
Hari
--
Hari Shreedharan
On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> Hi Sqoop developers,
> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
>
> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
>
> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
>
> I would love to hear others thoughts!
>
> Jarcec
>
> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
>
>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
Thank you Venkat for stepping in to help with the release, and thank you
Jarcec for being the release mentor!
Best Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Alexander Alten-Lorenz <wget.null@gmail.com
> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mar 29, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sqoop developers,
> > It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under
> version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the
> development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be
> resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features
> including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC
> Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type
> that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
> >
> > That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99
> line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was
> in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up
> as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step
> up to be the mentor.
> >
> > During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one
> got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would
> be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this
> option to the broader community.
> >
> > I would love to hear others thoughts!
> >
> > Jarcec
> >
> > 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
> > 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
>
> --
> Alexander Alten-Lorenz
> http://mapredit.blogspot.com
> German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
>
>
Re: Suggestion for Sqoop 2 1.99.2 release
Posted by Alexander Alten-Lorenz <wg...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mar 29, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Sqoop developers,
> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle.
>
> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the mentor.
>
> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the broader community.
>
> I would love to hear others thoughts!
>
> Jarcec
>
> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
--
Alexander Alten-Lorenz
http://mapredit.blogspot.com
German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF