You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by "Robert J. Liguori" <ca...@gliesian.com> on 2011/07/30 06:24:39 UTC
Camel and XMLBeans
I noticed that Camel has support for Apache XMLBeans.
I'm trying to figure out what's going on with the Apache XMLBeans
project.
Is it dead? Has it been replaced with newer technologies?
What's going on?
Note: I noticed that the build releases, mailing lists, documentation,
etc. for Apache XMLBeans are all stalled (in a obvious sense).
The reason I ask, is that I'm trying to decide between using JAXB and
XMLBeans, in relationship to Camel components.
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
Robert J. Liguori
STG Technologies, Inc.
Re: Camel and XMLBeans
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> My suggestion is use JAXB but not XMLBeans if your project not based on
> XMLBeans before.
> An actively developed project like JAXB is definitely more suitable for your
> new project, you can get better support when you encounter issues.
>
There is also XStream which is active maintained project.
http://xstream.codehaus.org/
It allows to marshal without any descriptor files or annotations at
all, if you can rely on its convention over configuration.
>
> Freeman
> On 2011-7-31, at 上午4:18, Robert J. Liguori wrote:
>
>> "I think you have more luck asking about the activity of the XMLBeans
>> project on the XMLBeans mailing list."
>> Rob>> I have, and have yet to receive a response, so thought I'd try my
>> luck here since it's the XMLBeans Camel component I plan to be using.
>>
>> " So it's a matter of choice, are you in a greenfield situation? "
>> Rob>> First I've heard this term, "greenfield"... had to Google it.
>> So, it's not exactly a greenfield... but as I mentioned, I ended up
>> deciding on using XMLBeans.
>>
>> I guess at this point, I'm most interested in asking if anyone can
>> share there experiences working with the Camel XMLBeans component, if
>> you guys don't mind?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Richard, thanks for the response.
>>
>> -- Robert
>>
>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Richard Kettelerij
>> <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you have more luck asking about the activity of the XMLBeans
>>> project
>>> on the XMLBeans mailing list.
>>>
>>> As far as Camel goes, it support pretty much all of the popular
>>> object-to-xml marshaling libraries: JAXB, XMLBeans, Castor, JibX and
>>> XStream. The latter is more a serialization library than a marshaling one
>>> but that's a detail. JAXB has the benefit of being part in the JDK. So
>>> it's
>>> a matter of choice, are you in a greenfield situation? Or are you already
>>> using of these technologies?
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>>
>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-and-XMLBeans-tp4649021p4649604.html
>>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>> Robert J. Liguori
>> STG Technologies, Inc.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Freeman Fang
>
> FuseSource
> Email:ffang@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: Camel and XMLBeans
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Robert,
My suggestion is use JAXB but not XMLBeans if your project not based
on XMLBeans before.
An actively developed project like JAXB is definitely more suitable
for your new project, you can get better support when you encounter
issues.
Freeman
On 2011-7-31, at 上午4:18, Robert J. Liguori wrote:
> "I think you have more luck asking about the activity of the XMLBeans
> project on the XMLBeans mailing list."
> Rob>> I have, and have yet to receive a response, so thought I'd try
> my
> luck here since it's the XMLBeans Camel component I plan to be using.
>
> " So it's a matter of choice, are you in a greenfield situation? "
> Rob>> First I've heard this term, "greenfield"... had to Google it.
> So, it's not exactly a greenfield... but as I mentioned, I ended up
> deciding on using XMLBeans.
>
> I guess at this point, I'm most interested in asking if anyone can
> share there experiences working with the Camel XMLBeans component, if
> you guys don't mind?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Richard, thanks for the response.
>
> -- Robert
>
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Richard Kettelerij
> <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think you have more luck asking about the activity of the
>> XMLBeans project
>> on the XMLBeans mailing list.
>>
>> As far as Camel goes, it support pretty much all of the popular
>> object-to-xml marshaling libraries: JAXB, XMLBeans, Castor, JibX and
>> XStream. The latter is more a serialization library than a
>> marshaling one
>> but that's a detail. JAXB has the benefit of being part in the JDK.
>> So it's
>> a matter of choice, are you in a greenfield situation? Or are you
>> already
>> using of these technologies?
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-and-XMLBeans-tp4649021p4649604.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Robert J. Liguori
> STG Technologies, Inc.
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ffang@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
Re: Camel and XMLBeans
Posted by "Robert J. Liguori" <ca...@gliesian.com>.
"I think you have more luck asking about the activity of the XMLBeans
project on the XMLBeans mailing list."
Rob>> I have, and have yet to receive a response, so thought I'd try my
luck here since it's the XMLBeans Camel component I plan to be using.
" So it's a matter of choice, are you in a greenfield situation? "
Rob>> First I've heard this term, "greenfield"... had to Google it.
So, it's not exactly a greenfield... but as I mentioned, I ended up
deciding on using XMLBeans.
I guess at this point, I'm most interested in asking if anyone can
share there experiences working with the Camel XMLBeans component, if
you guys don't mind?
Thanks!
Richard, thanks for the response.
-- Robert
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Richard Kettelerij
<ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you have more luck asking about the activity of the XMLBeans project
> on the XMLBeans mailing list.
>
> As far as Camel goes, it support pretty much all of the popular
> object-to-xml marshaling libraries: JAXB, XMLBeans, Castor, JibX and
> XStream. The latter is more a serialization library than a marshaling one
> but that's a detail. JAXB has the benefit of being part in the JDK. So it's
> a matter of choice, are you in a greenfield situation? Or are you already
> using of these technologies?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-and-XMLBeans-tp4649021p4649604.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sincerely,
Robert J. Liguori
STG Technologies, Inc.
Re: Camel and XMLBeans
Posted by Richard Kettelerij <ri...@gmail.com>.
I think you have more luck asking about the activity of the XMLBeans project
on the XMLBeans mailing list.
As far as Camel goes, it support pretty much all of the popular
object-to-xml marshaling libraries: JAXB, XMLBeans, Castor, JibX and
XStream. The latter is more a serialization library than a marshaling one
but that's a detail. JAXB has the benefit of being part in the JDK. So it's
a matter of choice, are you in a greenfield situation? Or are you already
using of these technologies?
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-and-XMLBeans-tp4649021p4649604.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.