You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> on 2005/11/22 19:17:24 UTC
1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Barely a few hours later, here is rc4. It is rc3, but packaged with a
vanilla libtool, rather than the hacked Debian libtool my system comes
with. The magic revision is r17475 (a small merge was included, so that
the dist.sh in the release is the one which built the release).
http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
As with -rc3, please test this and send signatures, critical bug
reports, small furry creatures and free lunches. Don't forget to Cc: me
for binding signatures, so that I can keep track and (perhaps, this
time) release to the general public.
Apologies for the useless contribution to global warming with rc3. This
one should be clean and only contain subversion's own bugs.
(guess this goes to show why package maintainers shouldn't rush to
package rc's before they are made officially public!)
- Dave.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@red-bean.com>.
So I take it that rc4 is going forward? No sudden objections or
withdrawals? If so, it looks like we really do need some windows
signatures from me/erik/brane...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Max Bowsher <ma...@ukf.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Anderson wrote:
> http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
Tested OK 6-way + swig-py + swig-pl on Debian stable.
System apr, apr-util, neon. No swig installation.
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.bz2.asc
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQBDg8ItfFNSmcDyxYARAqWEAKCEplhUqkfegFRgaJht2167KMbwRwCeLWP1
BGSYe7HISIyAMvh7104wOEw=
=M89t
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.gz.asc
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQBDg8IyfFNSmcDyxYARAgycAKC8GitDvmFmeJ7075y2rYNZEu8PigCcC86y
szSg08dg104/BbEpBLyb+34=
=H0rF
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Max.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFDg8MUfFNSmcDyxYARAhCqAKDWiYnc3J5HqXz0wDkphuhUMK/ZEACg1glj
pgYosIPN5QCz+/jVaCrEUf0=
=+ZTp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> writes:
> I find it fairly abnormal that there are that many differences. I cut
> rc4 from r17475, since when there has been a single alteration to the
> 1.3.x branch (a nomination).
>
> However, the tone of your email seems to mean this amount of diff is a
> normal thing. Could you be more specific as to what the differences
> are/look like/could be due to?
Mostly libtool shell scripts (the ones generated by ltmain.sh), a few
configury files, all the .svn dirs (I was too lazy to do an export), a
few www files... That sort of thing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by "Peter N. Lundblad" <pe...@famlundblad.se>.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>
> > On 11/23/05, David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> wrote:
> > kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > > David, FWIW I did my usual comparison of the tarball source with the
> > > 1.3.x tree. There were 27,192 lines of differences
> >
Interesting. I unpacked the tarball, exported the tag and ran diff -u on
it. It gives the following:
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/ac-helpers and exported/ac-helpers
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: apr
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: apr-util
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/build and exported/build
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: build-outputs.mk
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: ChangeLog.CVS
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: configure
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/contrib and exported/contrib
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/doc and exported/doc
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: gen-make.opts
diff -u subversion-1.3.0-rc4/INSTALL exported/INSTALL
--- subversion-1.3.0-rc4/INSTALL 2005-10-24 18:34:22.000000000 +0200
+++ exported/INSTALL 2005-10-24 18:34:22.794990000 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
A Quick Guide
======================================
-$LastChangedDate: 2005-10-24 18:34:22 +0200 (lun, 24 oct 2005) $
+$LastChangedDate: 2005-10-24 18:34:22 +0200 (mån, 24 okt 2005) $
Contents:
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: neon
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/notes and exported/notes
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/packages and exported/packages
diff -u subversion-1.3.0-rc4/README exported/README
--- subversion-1.3.0-rc4/README 2005-09-09 18:03:59.000000000 +0200
+++ exported/README 2005-09-09 18:03:59.923172000 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Subversion, a version control system.
=====================================
-$LastChangedDate: 2005-09-09 18:03:59 +0200 (ven, 09 sep 2005) $
+$LastChangedDate: 2005-09-09 18:03:59 +0200 (fre, 09 sep 2005) $
Contents:
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/subversion and exported/subversion
Only in subversion-1.3.0-rc4: subversion_msvc.dsw
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/tools and exported/tools
diff -u subversion-1.3.0-rc4/TRANSLATING exported/TRANSLATING
--- subversion-1.3.0-rc4/TRANSLATING 2005-09-05 20:54:50.000000000 +0200
+++ exported/TRANSLATING 2005-09-05 20:54:50.917764000 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Guide to translating Subversion
===============================
-$LastChangedDate: 2005-09-05 20:54:50 +0200 (lun, 05 sep 2005) $
+$LastChangedDate: 2005-09-05 20:54:50 +0200 (mån, 05 sep 2005) $
* Introduction
* Software version requirements
Common subdirectories: subversion-1.3.0-rc4/www and exported/www
As Erik suggests, we have a few places with keyword expansion (but not
27000 lines...). The rest is added generated files and dependencies.
But this does of course not buy us any "security", since Dave could well
trojan neon or APR:-) But it might catch some stupid mistakes.
IF we want to protect against a malicous RM, we need to repeat the exact
steps to create the tarballs and then compare the output. But... well...
do we really need that level of paranoia?
(BTW, dave, looking at the expanded keywords, you seem to have used a
non-English locale when exporting. YOu might want to change that for the
final release. This is just for weekday names, so it is so minor that my
fingers start hurting when I write this paragraph...)
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by "Peter N. Lundblad" <pe...@famlundblad.se>.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 11/23/05, David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > David, FWIW I did my usual comparison of the tarball source with the
> > 1.3.x tree. There were 27,192 lines of differences
>
> I find it fairly abnormal that there are that many differences. I cut
> rc4 from r17475, since when there has been a single alteration to the
> 1.3.x branch (a nomination).
>
> However, the tone of your email seems to mean this amount of diff is a
> normal thing. Could you be more specific as to what the differences
> are/look like/could be due to?
>Keyword expansion due to the fact that he compares 1.3.x with the tag?
>(Which expand to different times and URLs.)
Uh, how many places do we use keyword expansion in?
Maybe the diff includes the added dependencies, or perhaps the generated
files?
Regards,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Erik Huelsmann <eh...@gmail.com>.
On 11/23/05, David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> > David, FWIW I did my usual comparison of the tarball source with the
> > 1.3.x tree. There were 27,192 lines of differences
>
> I find it fairly abnormal that there are that many differences. I cut
> rc4 from r17475, since when there has been a single alteration to the
> 1.3.x branch (a nomination).
>
> However, the tone of your email seems to mean this amount of diff is a
> normal thing. Could you be more specific as to what the differences
> are/look like/could be due to?
Keyword expansion due to the fact that he compares 1.3.x with the tag?
(Which expand to different times and URLs.)
bye,
Erik.
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by David Anderson <da...@calixo.net>.
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> David, FWIW I did my usual comparison of the tarball source with the
> 1.3.x tree. There were 27,192 lines of differences
I find it fairly abnormal that there are that many differences. I cut
rc4 from r17475, since when there has been a single alteration to the
1.3.x branch (a nomination).
However, the tone of your email seems to mean this amount of diff is a
normal thing. Could you be more specific as to what the differences
are/look like/could be due to?
- Dave.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
David, FWIW I did my usual comparison of the tarball source with the
1.3.x tree. There were 27,192 lines of differences, so I *might* have
missed something, but as far as I can tell (with help from Emacs and
diff) all the deltas are innocuous. If someone malicious has slipped
a backdoor in, they've done it pretty cleverly :-).
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> writes:
> Barely a few hours later, here is rc4. It is rc3, but packaged with a
> vanilla libtool, rather than the hacked Debian libtool my system comes
> with. The magic revision is r17475 (a small merge was included, so
> that the dist.sh in the release is the one which built the release).
Tested 6-way (fs * ra) + swig-py + swig-pl -- all looks good.
.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDg7N3okEGqRcG/W4RAlBTAKCKZQg8irY5OtbrceULy1vlZ/kd1QCgv5af
g75rDNiXnX0EP8hM8UcP6fs=
=4/rm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.tar.bz2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDg7RookEGqRcG/W4RAr63AJ9gjHkWIv2Q5Kv4VrN76m3YmST4QgCfbMoB
Yddwnha31M10867AwR3uu3U=
=7oe0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@red-bean.com>.
On 11/22/05, David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> wrote:
> As with -rc3, please test this and send signatures,
The .zip passes tests 6-ways on Windows XP, built with Visual Studio 6.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQBDhH9nU0gaaOxrUVYRAsfhAJ4iYCVk068YvmrnKMBJBHpcPYgppACgvAGW
gNvvf3KTCxIrOk1ObCdQNMU=
=p3xJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Jani Averbach <ja...@jaa.iki.fi>.
On 2005-11-23 19:17+0100, David Anderson wrote:
> Thanks people for this round of signing! A quick update on the subject
> of are-we-there-yet: We are still missing two signatures for the win32
> zip file. Also, the ruby bindings have only been tested by one person
> (maxb is working on this). Other than that, barring very strong
> objections, rc4 can be the first rc to go public.
I am running my full release test suite, including all bindings.
If everything is good, my signature should be ready by evening.
BR, Jani
--
Jani Averbach
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Jani Averbach <ja...@jaa.iki.fi>.
On 2005-11-23 19:17+0100, David Anderson wrote:
> Thanks people for this round of signing! A quick update on the subject
> of are-we-there-yet: We are still missing two signatures for the win32
> zip file. Also, the ruby bindings have only been tested by one person
> (maxb is working on this). Other than that, barring very strong
> objections, rc4 can be the first rc to go public.
RC4 tested on amd64/Linux:
- {fsfs, bdb} x {ra_local, ra_svn, ra_dav}
- swig-{pl, py, rb}: make, check, install
- javahl: make, check, install
- verified content of svn, apr, apr-util, neon
BR, Jani
--
Jani Averbach
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Eric Gillespie <ep...@pretzelnet.org>.
Max Bowsher <ma...@ukf.net> writes:
> check-swig-rb OK, same environment as my previous tests.
>
> Of course, that only brings the total to two, so one more would be nice,
> though not required.
I tested ruby on NetBSD. I have no PGP key though, so i don't
know if this counts... I suppose i'll have to jump back on the
PGP bandwagon with a new key for the next release.
--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Max Bowsher <ma...@ukf.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Anderson wrote:
> Thanks people for this round of signing! A quick update on the subject
> of are-we-there-yet: We are still missing two signatures for the win32
> zip file. Also, the ruby bindings have only been tested by one person
> (maxb is working on this).
check-swig-rb OK, same environment as my previous tests.
Of course, that only brings the total to two, so one more would be nice,
though not required.
Max.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFDhLNjfFNSmcDyxYARAjutAKCUpYNAEmAdbBAVhZbcu9lOekbKgQCgpC2L
OiOXSu6Kyw+cE7xphnBMmp8=
=JAZG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by David Anderson <da...@calixo.net>.
Thanks people for this round of signing! A quick update on the subject
of are-we-there-yet: We are still missing two signatures for the win32
zip file. Also, the ruby bindings have only been tested by one person
(maxb is working on this). Other than that, barring very strong
objections, rc4 can be the first rc to go public.
- Dave.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>.
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 14:17, David Anderson wrote:
> Barely a few hours later, here is rc4. It is rc3, but packaged with a
> vanilla libtool, rather than the hacked Debian libtool my system comes
> with. The magic revision is r17475 (a small merge was included, so that
> the dist.sh in the release is the one which built the release).
>
> http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
[snip]
Ran all 6 variations (svn, http, file vs. bdb, fsfs), and check-swig-{py, rb}
on SuSE Linux 10.
-John
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Erik Huelsmann <eh...@gmail.com>.
> Apologies for the useless contribution to global warming with rc3. This
> one should be clean and only contain subversion's own bugs.
>
> (guess this goes to show why package maintainers shouldn't rush to
> package rc's before they are made officially public!)
My sig for the .zip:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDhV6Gi5O0Epaz9TkRAuZbAJ0ZzBT4nBcrcumfS4+iNsO8xl0mggCfYXc4
CNRimbhftbo+NovEPapDLvA=
=+HVK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
bye,
Erik.
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Malcolm Rowe <ma...@farside.org.uk>.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:17:24PM +0100, David Anderson wrote:
> Barely a few hours later, here is rc4.
Looks good here, Slackware and Darwin, though I've only tested ra_local
and fsfs, so no signatures from me!
Regards,
Malcolm
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 11/22/05, Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> On 11/22/05, David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> wrote:
> > Barely a few hours later, here is rc4. It is rc3, but packaged with a
> > vanilla libtool, rather than the hacked Debian libtool my system comes
> > with. The magic revision is r17475 (a small merge was included, so that
> > the dist.sh in the release is the one which built the release).
> >
> > http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
>
> +1 for release on both subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.gz and
> subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.bz2.
>
> Tested with both bdb and fsfs over all three RA layers on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE.
Oh, and since I appear to have neglected to mention it, also tested
the perl, python, and ruby bindings, no problems noted, everything
seems to work just fine.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Helio Chissini de Castro <he...@mandriva.com>.
Em Tuesday 22 November 2005 19:31, Garrett Rooney escreveu:
> On 11/22/05, David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> wrote:
> > Barely a few hours later, here is rc4. It is rc3, but packaged with a
> > vanilla libtool, rather than the hacked Debian libtool my system comes
> > with. The magic revision is r17475 (a small merge was included, so that
> > the dist.sh in the release is the one which built the release).
> >
> > http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
>
> +1 for release on both subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.gz and
> subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.bz2.
Same to me.
Already uploaded to Mandriva cooker. Both x86_64 and x86 compilations working
ok with our both repositories ( bdb and fsfs )
--
Helio Chissini de Castro
Research and development
Mandriva Brasil Labs
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On 11/22/05, David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> wrote:
> Barely a few hours later, here is rc4. It is rc3, but packaged with a
> vanilla libtool, rather than the hacked Debian libtool my system comes
> with. The magic revision is r17475 (a small merge was included, so that
> the dist.sh in the release is the one which built the release).
>
> http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
+1 for release on both subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.gz and
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.bz2.
Tested with both bdb and fsfs over all three RA layers on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE.
Unfortunately, I realized this morning that I had accidentally deleted
my private PGP key the last time I reinstalled my operating system, so
I had to revoke it and create a new one, and thus this key hasn't
actually been signed by anyone. Oh well, regardless, here are my
signatures.
For subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.gz:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDg4z4yR242pvPzi8RAh/eAKCCsR4AZhalsxUH2NQFtUW/FY7ILgCg8b3A
6i3qSIJgv6uF0TLlby5OYhc=
=SiJR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
And for subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.bz2:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDg40DyR242pvPzi8RAhGOAJ4rAl6E4cusU4fiWHK06bI9VoZmYgCfYHta
jbPICxYpmDMFm/Tl+LKM7gc=
=z4r4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
David Anderson <da...@calixo.net> writes:
> http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
Thanks, David. 6-way tests passed for me, Debian GNU/Linux, up-to-date
'testing' dist, w/ Apache 2.0.54 and pure catgut internal cabling:
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.gz:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDg6nFvJ27E9sAokgRAn0vAJ9S5RGOxlMS/FLlVgZRqYfGusoH6ACfYdxP
VDPVVGdpQN72ddxToIxlUEo=
=iDiV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.bz2:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDg6m9vJ27E9sAokgRAl13AKDkRbTtFUYiShD/5VjRwHioK5uzBQCeIQ/k
/p4XgZWRudNhx5QZ/Ro4YQc=
=oLkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by "Peter N. Lundblad" <pe...@famlundblad.se>.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, David Anderson wrote:
> http://lolut.utbm.info/pub/subversion-1.3.0/rc4/
>
I've done 6-way testing on Debian testing x86 plus check-swig-py and
check-swig-pl. They all succeed. Below are my sigs.
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDhCOt6GFjKbrWIbYRAix0AKCIsbEQDD8UUidiQzP/CQ2GAkWd6ACggFa6
wUzQo3X8lGrU76CjgNr66tU=
=7epZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.tar.bz2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDhCO36GFjKbrWIbYRAsRWAKCuNRa1CiWn/RBgPJ0HTdpi7jojxgCfQdXa
r3o8xRotv5qnLu1rfY+p2MA=
=Mw/E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks,
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by David James <ja...@cs.toronto.edu>.
On 11/24/05, Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
> The Windows zip file passes all 6 combinations; WinXP/NTFS/MSVC6.
>
> I also found a tiny bug in the Windows distro script that caused the
> binary packages to be generated without the translated .mo files. I've
> proposed the one-liner for inclusion in 1.3.0; the fix is trivial and
> doesn't touch the core code.
Looks like we have all the signatures we need for RC4, now. We have at
least three signatures for both the zip and the tarballs. So, then,
time to release?
Cheers,
David
--
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
The Windows zip file passes all 6 combinations; WinXP/NTFS/MSVC6.
I also found a tiny bug in the Windows distro script that caused the
binary packages to be generated without the translated .mo files. I've
proposed the one-liner for inclusion in 1.3.0; the fix is trivial and
doesn't touch the core code.
-- Brane
Re: 1.3.0-rc4 tarballs up for testing/signing
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@softlanding.com>.
Here is my signature for the Windows zip file. I verified
that the content is identical, and that it passes win_tests.py over
all six combinations of RA layer and FS back end.
I also verified that it passes the JavaHL tests.
I am not a full committer so this is a non-binding vote.
subversion-1.3.0-rc4.zip.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iQEVAwUAQ4OE5xWeN4F91mdnAQIJcgf/RNPWGKL4T7cjH2uv1/MXPpj+uyuTbxuZ
ZCEsawM2WwVz0+YO5Lx+VeGo3N+K3ny5Bpoq3tHAa/u3UIAkrkNfEL7PTSDXe4zc
Hx5Lpm6gPx/8uqsXTNy9IG/j1nr14g8uh1D1dewxTdDyClxZVK4kTKg1p7wIaOi1
ZQs0ripT+QqTA0MEpDsKZG+UJ4UPH028bP6HPBaIIZUb1JdzVM9vahrAm23wLoSI
YfWn7FdNZdzvCZS4l0v4Dn8RYy3j1q3v331JK+LcdvbXIRSVLZnBqpbwMkmKBp6Z
IANiJR30/ccq5mI2J7tDU0dQLw91IvCGURd1uoG6q/1j4VDz2USafg==
=Lwjt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Here is my public key info.
pub 2048R/7DD66767 2005-05-12 Mark Phippard (SoftLanding Systems)
<ma...@softlanding.com>
Key fingerprint = EAF4 5239 AF08 D762 539A 13D5 159E 3781 7DD6 6767
Thanks
Mark
_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org