You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Stanislav Kozlovski <st...@confluent.io> on 2019/02/12 17:00:18 UTC

Re: [DISCUSSION] KIP-412: Extend Admin API to support dynamic application log levels

Hey there everybody,

If there aren't any further comments, I will consider starting a VOTE
thread in the following days.

Best,
Stanislav

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:31 PM Ryanne Dolan <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Makes sense, thanks.
>
> Ryanne
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 11:28 PM Stanislav Kozlovski <stanislav@confluent.io
> wrote:
>
> > Sorry about cutting the last message short. I was meaning to say that in
> > the future we would be able to introduce finer-grained logging
> > configuration (e.g enable debug logs for operations pertaining to this
> > topic) and that would be easier to do if we are to know what the target
> > resource of an IncrementalAlterConfig request is.
> >
> > Separating the resource types also allows us to not return a huge
> > DescribeConfigs response on the BROKER resource type - the logging
> > configurations can be quite verbose.
> >
> > I hope that answers your question
> >
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 3:26 PM Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanislav@confluent.io
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Ryanne, thanks for taking a look at the KIP!
> > >
> > > I think that it is useful to specify the distinction between a standard
> > > Kafka config and the log level configs. The log level can be looked at
> > as a
> > > separate resource as it does not change the behavior of the Kafka
> broker
> > in
> > > any way.
> > > In terms of practical benefits, separating the two eases this KIP's
> > > implementation and user's implementation of AlterConfigPolicy (e.g deny
> > all
> > > requests that try to alter log level) significantly. We would also be
> > able
> > > to introduce a
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:48 AM Ryanne Dolan <ry...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> > To differentiate between the normal Kafka config settings and the
> > >> application's log level settings, we will introduce a new resource
> type
> > -
> > >> BROKER_LOGGERS
> > >>
> > >> Stanislav, can you explain why log level wouldn't be a "normal Kafka
> > >> config
> > >> setting"?
> > >>
> > >> Ryanne
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, 4:26 PM Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > stanislav@confluent.io
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hey there everybody,
> > >> >
> > >> > I'd like to start a discussion about KIP-412. Please take a look at
> > the
> > >> KIP
> > >> > if you can, I would appreciate any feedback :)
> > >> >
> > >> > KIP: KIP-412
> > >> > <
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-412%3A+Extend+Admin+API+to+support+dynamic+application+log+levels
> > >> > >
> > >> > JIRA: KAFKA-7800 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7800>
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Best,
> > >> > Stanislav
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best,
> > > Stanislav
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
>


-- 
Best,
Stanislav