You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/03/27 15:54:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-9888) Re-instead CheckIndex's attempts to confirm index sort is consistent across all segments

Michael McCandless created LUCENE-9888:
------------------------------------------

             Summary: Re-instead CheckIndex's attempts to confirm index sort is consistent across all segments
                 Key: LUCENE-9888
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9888
             Project: Lucene - Core
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Michael McCandless


[~rmuir] opened this awesome PR to enable ecj redundant {{null}} checking: [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/44]

But one of the chunks of dead code we removed from {{CheckIndex}} was spooky: [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/44/files#r602733991]

I think the intention here was to confirm that each segment's {{indexSort}} is the same, but because the {{Sort previousIndexSort = null}} declaration was *inside* the {{for}} body, it made the check pointless!

I'll make a simple PR to re-instate the code and move the declaration outside the loop.  Who knows, maybe fixing this long latent bug in {{CheckIndex}} will catch a fly?  And maybe we could do some git archaeology to understand how the code became zombified?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org