You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/03/27 15:54:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-9888) Re-instead CheckIndex's attempts to
confirm index sort is consistent across all segments
Michael McCandless created LUCENE-9888:
------------------------------------------
Summary: Re-instead CheckIndex's attempts to confirm index sort is consistent across all segments
Key: LUCENE-9888
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9888
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael McCandless
[~rmuir] opened this awesome PR to enable ecj redundant {{null}} checking: [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/44]
But one of the chunks of dead code we removed from {{CheckIndex}} was spooky: [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/44/files#r602733991]
I think the intention here was to confirm that each segment's {{indexSort}} is the same, but because the {{Sort previousIndexSort = null}} declaration was *inside* the {{for}} body, it made the check pointless!
I'll make a simple PR to re-instate the code and move the declaration outside the loop. Who knows, maybe fixing this long latent bug in {{CheckIndex}} will catch a fly? And maybe we could do some git archaeology to understand how the code became zombified?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org